On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:32:56 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Julien Cristau
>> wrote:
>> > If dolfin only works with the version of swig it was built against, that
>>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Julien Cristau
wrote:
> If dolfin only works with the version of swig it was built against, that
> needs to be reflected in the package dependencies.
Okay, but I'm unsure how to do that. Currently I have "Build-Depends:
swig2.0" in the source package and "Depends:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Johan Hake wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Johannes Ring wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
>>> Does it work if you remove those checks in
>>>
>>> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> Does it work if you remove those checks in
>
> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py
> dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py
>
> ?
Yes, it works fine, but I also had to remove the check in
ufc_utils/bui
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Anders Logg wrote:
> Does this break because we check the SWIG version in the JIT compiler,
> or because it actually breaks (with some link error)?
It is the version check that makes it break. This is the error message:
OSError: PyDOLFIN was not compiled with t
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 08:43:54 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > Johannes Ring (31/05/2012):
>> >> python-ufc needs to be rebuilt agains
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Mathieu Malaterre
wrote:
> If I may, I believe this is due to: http://bugs.debian.org/674263
> Any binary build with swig 2.0.5 or 2.0.6 should be rebuild IMHO.
I agree, considering the regressions in SWIG 2.0.5 and 2.0.6, however,
the problem in #675207 is not rel
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Johannes Ring (31/05/2012):
>> python-ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (2.0.7). Please
>> binNMU it.
>>
>> nmu python-ufc_2.0.5-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against swig 2.0.7, see
>>
Hello,
python-ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (2.0.7). Please
binNMU it.
nmu python-ufc_2.0.5-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against swig 2.0.7, see #675207.'
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Can't speak for the others (dolfin, feel++, gmsh).
DOLFIN 1.0.0 works with PETSc/SLEPc 3.2, only minor changes are needed
in the Debian files. I can make a new upload soon.
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> Johannes Ring wrote:
>> [ Please Cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list. ]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (1.3.39). Please binNMU it.
>
> Architecture: all packages cann
[ Please Cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list. ]
Hi,
ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (1.3.39). Please binNMU it.
nmu ufc_1.1.2-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against swig 1.3.39, see #543097.'
Thanks,
Johannes Ring
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
12 matches
Mail list logo
