ssible to make it worse by
setting it to anything).
In summary, I wanted to ask you to consider pusing sablevm-classlib
1.11.3-2 into Sarge.
Thank you for making Sarge happen,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
PS: The sablevm package needs not to be updated. The construction of
depe
On Sun, 2005-23-01 at 22:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:29:56AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > Could you please hint sablevm and sablevm-classlib to go together into
> > testing/Sarge?
>
> > ATM Sarge contains version 1.1.6-6 whic
being
packaged for inclusion into 'main' ATM).
Thanks in advance,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SableVM - Free, LGPL'ed Java VM http://sablevm.org
Why SableVM ?!? http://sablevm.or
Whops!
I didn't think hinting might not be needed if I only update sablevm.
Thanks for explanation and sorry for the noise,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
W liście z nie, 29-08-2004, godz. 20:44, Steve Langasek pisze:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 02:42:31PM -0400,
packages are split in sablevm and
sablevm-classlib - they still need hinting to get into testing/Sarge.
Thanks in advance,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
PS: The finally built ARM version has just hit incoming.d.o.
This means SableVM is built and, to our best knowledge, fully functional
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:44:23PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > The 1.1.6-1 packages of SableVM (sablevm and sablevm-classlib sources)
> > didn't get into testing even though 5 days period is finished. Could
> >
Hello again,
The 1.1.6-1 packages of SableVM (sablevm and sablevm-classlib sources)
didn't get into testing even though 5 days period is finished. Could
somebody please hint them again [*] to get into testing?
Thanks in advance,
Grzegorz B. Prokopsk
and mipsel while sablevm-classlib *IS* built properly
on these platforms.
Let me know if there's anything I missed.
Cheers,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPLe
longer term. Now I have much better overview of what's happening.
Meanwhile - could you please KICK SableVM 1.1.3 to go into testing?
Thanks
GBP
--
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
Sable
On (27/04/04 22:33), Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Grzegorz,
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:36:58PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
>
> > sorry for bothering you, but there's something wrong (again) w/ migration
> > of SableVM packages to testing. Last time 1.1.0-5
libsablevm1
Could you please take a look at what's going on?
Thanks,
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sablevm
Checking sablevm
* trying to update sablevm from 1.1.0-5 to 1.1.3-1 (candidate is 13
days old)
* sablevm
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 03:59, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > I used to think that I would never ask such questions, but I am looking
> > for 10th time in last 3 days at:
> > http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sablevm
> >
> >
esting
scripts. Do I need them for SableVM? How can I find out? Or is there
some problem with my packages? On SID they apt-get install just fine.
I'd be thankful for a bit of info/help
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
PS: SableVM in testing is completly broken because b
I asked at #debian-devel and was adviced to contact debian-release.
So this is mainly for debian-release to take a look at.
W liście z sob, 17-01-2004, godz. 06:38, Mark Howard pisze:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:44:34AM -0500, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
> > The problem is known, I p
14 matches
Mail list logo
