Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 06:25:20PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > > I've never been able to file any (non-automated) bug report in > > > 5 minutes. And if you don't even have direct access to the > > > hardware it takes longer. > > > > I agree. I'm trying to build netgen here too and if the

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 07:48:38PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: ... > I know how to file gcc bugs. I've just filed one. I didn't > have time to try and reduce the testcase, and I can't try > different versions of g++ yet. I've asked to have different > versions installed on paer. > > The bug repor

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 05:13:44PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:01:31AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, dann frazier said: > > > Are we still having random segfaults on paer? If so - that's be a good > > > one to resolve. Not sure if DSA would

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 08:25:31AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: ... > > BTW, that firewall was reviewed and approved by Lamont (a pretty well > > known DD and buildd maintainer). > > > > Thibaut Varene (who is a DD) has offered to host HPPA buildd machines > > as well but hasn't heard any response

Re: HPPA and Squeeze

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 08:49:26AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Grant Grundler wrote: > > +linux-parisc (hppa kernel, compiler and !debian tech forum) > > > > Neil, > > thanks for the summary. I know this is an unpleasant business in general. > > > > On Tue,

Re: hppa in danger of being ignored for testing migration and eventual removal

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:34:36PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: ... > > > * The machines that host the buildds still seem to have a very > > > unreliable kernel. Is there any update on this? > > > > I can't comment on this. > > Thibaut had planned to setup a second buildd (and I think had it up > f

Re: HPPA and lenny

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 06:57:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Kyle McMartin wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:19:46PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > >> I know very little about hppa, but from what I read in this thread - > >> which was surprisingly helpful so far - it's the kernel that makes st

Re: status of ruby1.9 on hppa

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:55:57PM +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote: ... > AFAICT Gentoo supports HPPA too. But I expect they depend heavily on debian. ie installer, compiler, source packages, etc. They have even fewer people working on hppa. cheers, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:54:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a > > kernel bug? > > > > It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions... > >

Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Grant Grundler writes: ... > > Has anyone built a kernel with this version of gcc-4.3 and tried it? > > Can I "apt-get install -t sid gcc-4.3" on my hybrid system and get > > the right version? >

Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:48:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Grant Grundler writes: > > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > ... > > > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results > > > than with gcc-4.

Re: Approval to upload gcc-defaults 1.70?

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:53:54PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... > FYI the glibc testsuite with gcc-4.3 on HPPA now gives the same results > than with gcc-4.2, except on one FPU test, due to a bug in the *glibc*. > > So it *seems* HPPA is ready for gcc-4.3 by default. Has anyone built a kernel

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 06:24:12PM +, rubisher wrote: ... >> I looked at gcc-43 build output to check warnings related to networking >> as suggest by John David Anglin. ... > That remember me that when I discover those new warnings with gcc-4.2 >

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > Another gcc problem report: > > That past weekend I built the latest parisc-2.6-25-rc6 kernel from > Kyle's tree using gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and gcc-4.3. All three kernels > booted but the networking only worke

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:42:44PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have tried to build the glibc with GCC 4.3 on hppa, and rpcgen > > segfaults when it is used, so the build fails. I haven't start to > > investigate

Re: [alpha, hppa] GCC-4.3 as the default compilers for lenny?

On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:20:35AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > Another gcc problem report: > > That past weekend I built the latest parisc-2.6-25-rc6 kernel from > Kyle's tree using gcc-4.1, gcc-4.2, and gcc-4.3. All three kernels > booted but the networking only worke

Re: [parisc-linux] [Fwd: [patch/hppa] Floating point exception

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:52:34PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > > > The > > > only reason they would need rebuilt after a glibc bug fix would be if the > > > glibc ABI changed in the process, and that would be Very Bad. > > > > Yeah, hopefully that doesn't happen. > > As I have previously

Re: [parisc-linux] [Fwd: [patch/hppa] Floating point exception handling patch]

On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:03:59AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This is a pretty short list... Would anyone object to binNMUs of the > > effected packages on hppa, once a fixed glibc is uploaded? > > If the bug is in glibc, why would any of these packages need binNMUs? Only if they were stati

Re: qt-x11-free build fails

On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be > helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug > #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by > it). Stev

Re: qt-x11-free build fails

On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:16:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > [cc:ed to the hppa porters individually, as well as to debian-hppa; please > let me know if you prefer to get such mail just via the list in the future.] Yes, I do - thanks. > Are the hppa porters aware of bug #342545 in libgcc2, w

Re: requalification of debian/hppa for etch

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 06:52:17PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > I've started a wiki page to start collecting info for the hppa > requalification for etch: > http://wiki.debian.net/?hppaEtchReleaseRecertification thanks! > Please contribute any information you can, and leave some way for the > r