On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:54:13AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:11:30PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Have you narrowed done the problem to find if it is a gcc bug or a > > kernel bug? > > > > It fails with gcc-4.3, and works fine with all previous versions... > > Don't get me wrong though, I support switching to gcc-4.3 by default. If > anything, more breakages gives us a better chance to debug it. > > I'd just need gcc-4.2 to stick around for a while for the kernel.
Kyle, This is a good idea - switch to gcc-4.3 for everything but the kernel. I didnt think this would be possible but I'm not sure why I thought that. thanks, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
