Bug#961995: transition: boost-defaults

Il 02/06/20 09:37, Sebastian Ramacher ha scritto: > boost1.71 got built against the new icu everywhere, so feel free to go > ahead with the upload to unstable. Done, thanks! Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles signature.asc Description: O

Bug#961995: transition: boost-defaults

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I am requesting a transition slot to upload boost-defaults and promote Boost 1.71 to our default Boost version. Known FTBFS have already been filed with usertags: https://udd.deb

Bug#960193: transition: icu

quest bug already? Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#960193: transition: icu

ive, though. The build logs I got are here: https://people.debian.org/~gio/boost_migration/ Attached, in case it helps, is the mail template I am using for this run. If you want to use another one no problem, but please include the usertag data. Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Post

Bug#960193: transition: icu

f. I am filing bugs and patches for packages not building any more[1] and will request a transition once things seem to be ready. [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi?user=team%2Bboost%40tracker.debian.org&tag=boost1.71 Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - U

Bug#935158: Patch

Forgot the patch, sorry! Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles diff -Nru libgovirt-0.3.4/debian/changelog libgovirt-0.3.4/debian/changelog --- libgovirt-0.3.4/debian/changelog 2016-04-24 07:02:46.0 +0200 +++ libgovirt-0.3.4/debian/changelog 2019

Bug#935158: stretch-pu: package libgovirt/0.3.4-2+deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear SRM, I would like to propose you an NMU for package libgovirt in oldstable. This NMU fixes https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915270, and has already been accep

Bug#904316: transition: boost-defaults

he middle. I will try a local build now. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=912910 Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#904316: transition: boost-defaults

Hi, Il 28/09/18 18:31, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto: > The second block of packages have a failure that is rather clearly > related to the new boost version. For most of them the problem is that > something was moved to a different namespace or header, so the patch > should not be

Bug#904316: Any updates to boost 1.67 rebuilds ?

I posted in the BTS. I will keep working on it in the next days, as time permits. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#904316: transition: boost-defaults

Hi, Il 23/09/18 09:59, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto: > BTW, I am trying to do a rebuild of all packages depending on boost with > 1.62 and with 1.67, to see which new build failures are introduced. I > don't have much experience in mass rebuild and my only available > hardware

Bug#904316: transition: boost-defaults

.67, to see which new build failures are introduced. I don't have much experience in mass rebuild and my only available hardware is my own laptop, so it might take some time. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Postdoc researcher - Université Libre de Bruxelles signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Boost transition

with this kind of big transitions: is there documentation, best practices, checklists or something on how to do them as smoothly as possible? All my packages until now had at most two or three dependencies not directly uploaded by me... Please, keep me in Cc:. Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni

Re: Bug#713073: PTS: show library transition message also on the source package page

ne parsable way? If not, would you consider adding it? Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#655115: Not installable on kfreebsd-amd64, prevents geogebra testing migration

dn't give this sort of problems). This should fix this problem. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Migration of geogebra

n-depending packages uninstallable on kfreebsd-amd64: geogebra-kde"), or the fact that I'm receiving a completely unrelated error is to be considered a bug? Thanks, Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell.

Migration of geogebra

ting.pl?package=geogebra Could you help me? Thanks, Gio. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: proposed update to atftpd package in stable

assume that patch has aged enough? > > So far as I can see, no regressions relating to the patch have been > reported since that point? If so then yes we could look again at > including it in a stable update. > >> I haven't been involved with #598474; I'm adding Giova

Re: Intent to NMU

Hi again. Il 24/09/2010 00:58, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto: > @release team: the patch should be easily ported to the version now in > testing. Are you ok if I backport this patch for testing-proposed-updates? Sorry for the noise, the bug doesn't exist in squeeze, please jus

Intent to NMU

sting. Are you ok if I backport this patch for testing-proposed-updates? Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org diff -Nru gaphor-0.15.0/debian/changelog gaphor-0.15.0/d

Please add freeze exception for geogebra

e. Thanks, Gio. (please, Cc: me when replying) -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org diff -Nru geogebra-3.2.44.0+dfsg1/debian/changelog geogebra-3.2.44.0+dfsg1/debian/changelog --- geogebra-3.2.44

Re: Please add freeze exception for gitit

Il 11/08/2010 22:14, Philipp Kern ha scritto: > On 08/09/2010 02:26 PM, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Could you please add a freeze exception for the package gitit, that just >> passed the NEW and landed to unstable? It's a package I worked on for >

Please add freeze exception for gitit

e day. Given all the work I put in it, I'd really like to see it in squeeze. [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Giovanni+Mascellani Thanks, Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.hom

Re: Bug #474632: josm: Should not enter testing

Il giorno mer, 21/05/2008 alle 20.00 +0200, Torsten Werner ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Giovanni Mascellani > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > while an out-of-date josm wouldn't work for anyone. > > every Flickr client, the google dat