Bug#1110472: unblock: borgbackup2/2.0.0b19-1

Package: release.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:borgbackup2 X-Debbugs-Cc: borgback...@packages.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: locutusofb...@debian.org Severity: normal Please unblock package borgbackup2 there is a corruption bug fixed

Bug#1110214: unblock: qtcreator/16.0.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:qtcreator X-Debbugs-Cc: qtcrea...@packages.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: locutusofb...@debian.org Severity: normal Please unblock package qtcreator Unblock requested by DAM team, only ch

Bug#1050365: transition: yaml-cpp

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition All the packages are building properly, I checked in an Ubuntu ppa (and most of them are in sync w Debian). Only openimageio and qtcreator have issues finding the new libyaml-cpp rele

Bug#1006835: transition: sndio (NMU)

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Hello, I would like to transition sndio from version 1.5.0 to 1.8.1, bringing some new symbols (didn't touch any old symbol) and pkgconfig file helping reverse-dependencies (such as vlc)

Bug#993564: bullseye-pu: package dlt-viewer/2.21.2+dfsg-2+deb11u1

control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:40:34 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo > > On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 08:48:41AM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hello, for some reasons some headers in the -dev file were not > > ins

Bug#993564: bullseye-pu: package dlt-viewer/2.21.2+dfsg-2+deb11u1

o dev package + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Wed, 01 Sep 2021 11:42:30 +0200 + dlt-viewer (2.21.2+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Revert compat level bump to let package migrate to testing. diff --git a/debian/dlt-viewer-dev.install b/debian/dlt-viewer-dev.install index 231bd86..b8ee2ee 100644

Bug#985977: unblock: dlt-viewer/2.21.2+dfsg-1

On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 22:06:35 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:49:38 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > Seems fine without the compat bump. > > Please revert. > > https://release.debian.org/bullseye/FAQ.html (last section). > > Paul > > > done thanks!

Bug#985977: unblock: dlt-viewer/2.21.2+dfsg-1

update -sudo apt-get install -y build-essential qt5-default libqt5serialport5-dev -fi diff -Nru dlt-viewer-2.21.1+dfsg/debian/changelog dlt-viewer-2.21.2+dfsg/debian/changelog --- dlt-viewer-2.21.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2021-01-30 13:35:57.0 +0100 +++ dlt-viewer-2.21.2+dfsg/debian/ch

Bug#983918: buster-pu: package libbsd/0.9.1-2

-2+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * CVE-2019-20367 +A non-NUL terminated symbol name in the string table might +result in a out-of-bounds read. + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:03:12 +0100 + libbsd (0.9.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

Hello, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:13:07 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libjsoncpp.html > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On 2020-12-08 23:04:05 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hello again >

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

Hello again polybar is now ok too, because of the xcb-proto fix remaining failures are down to 4, only one without patch and one out from testing. kopanocore fail (unrelated: #969297) libseqlib fail (#976414) forwarded upstream that might be easily patchable spring

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 12:33:47 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > After having a look at the failures, > two of them are gone with new d-shlibs > > Remaining are failing for unrelated stuff, or have patches: > > kopanocore fail (unrelated: #969297) > polybar

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

After having a look at the failures, two of them are gone with new d-shlibs Remaining are failing for unrelated stuff, or have patches: kopanocore fail (unrelated: #969297) polybar fail (unrelated: #975795) libseqlib fail (#976414) forwarded upstream tha

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

Of the 44 involved packages, 34 of them are binNMU ok, rebuilds were fine. Of the remaining 10, 1 is an unrelated FTBFS, one is trivially fixable and the other are ongoing. I'll open bugs with patches in the next few days. G. cmake ok bamtoolsok chromium

Bug#976352: transition: libjsoncpp

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Hello, I would like to finally do this libjsoncpp transition before freeze. The version in sid has lots of bugs, and its really outdated. We have ~30 reverse-dependencies, last time I ch

Bug#974649: release.debian.org: new libnifti2 broke runtime (see #968730)

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, looks like new libnifti2 changed the runtime library name without changing soname (See #968730 for underground issue), so now reverse-dependencies are having troubles to start without a binNMU. We might just ask libnifti2 people to restore a sy

Bug#941571: buster-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.27-3.2

control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Wed, 02 Oct 2019 08:54:06 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On 2019-10-02 08:02, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote: > > the udev rules missing the group scanner. > > The new file debian/99-libsane.rules add them. > > This needs to be resolved i

Bug#940995: nmu: ntopng_3.8+dfsg1-2.1

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:26:42 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > Severity: normal > > nmu ntopng_3.8+dfsg1-2.1 . armhf . unstable . -m "no change rebuild with an > hig

Bug#940995: nmu: ntopng_3.8+dfsg1-2.1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal nmu ntopng_3.8+dfsg1-2.1 . armhf . unstable . -m "no change rebuild with an higher version, to avoid same version as stable" (current armhf package is getting rejected by dak because of thi

Bug#904418: transition: json-c

Hello, >Please go ahead in unstable. done! G.

Bug#904418: transition: json-c

Hello, On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 08:47:19 +0200 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hello all, > > > > So yeah 0.12.1-2 should be alright for sid/buster, and 0.13 will have to > > > wait > > > for bullseye after the freeze. > > > > Thank you very much Boyua

Bug#904418: transition: json-c

Hello all, > > So yeah 0.12.1-2 should be alright for sid/buster, and 0.13 will have to > > wait > > for bullseye after the freeze. > > Thank you very much Boyuan <3 > > I will have a look in a moment. > Hello, I fixed all the failing reverse-dependencies in Ubuntu, and completed the transi

Bug#929813: unblock: pugixml/1.9-3

+ * Fixup dev package creation, cmake was put in wrong place +(Closes: #929792) + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Fri, 31 May 2019 13:00:23 +0200 + pugixml (1.9-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Upload to unstable diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index a910c39..0ca135d 100755 --- a

Bug#926630: unblock: libpng1.6/1.6.36-6

: +70d122aac42933ab8a708c538f973c3307853212.patch (uncommented) +82ae623ec9bc3cb5c68aad22596a766e86d593b7.patch +a627bd26a375f5c41d54f90a47c838157d1bec97.patch + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:58:35 +0100 + libpng1.6 (1.6.36-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Tweak old 272 patch to add the

Bug#924124: unblock: virtualbox/6.0.4-dfsg-7

control: retitle -1 unblock: virtualbox/6.0.4-dfsg-7 I had to add a new patch for the guest tools, following removals of ttm structs https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/a64f784bb14a56bfdfad2dc397dd67e4564e3a29 and https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2bb42410b1bd324912389c6ac748df1c1bef

Bug#924124: unblock: virtualbox/6.0.4-dfsg-6

Control: tag -1 -moreinfo >> > - Added a Security.Debian.news file (or whatever is called), asked by >> > security team >> >> Not mentioned in changelog. sorry for that, I forgot to run gbp dch before committing, so the git history didn't get fully reflected in changelog >> > - added a two l

Bug#924124: unblock: virtualbox/6.0.4-dfsg-6

; urgency=medium + + * Upstream build fix with kernel 5.0 (LP: #1813071) + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:50:34 +0100 + virtualbox (6.0.4-dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Tweak java patch with upstream approach diff --git a/debian/patches/77542.patch b/debian/patches/77542

Bug#911580: [britney2] missing trigger with breaks relationship

Hello, >Out of curiosity: I couldn't spot the virtualbox-5.2 package in the >archive, what are you trying to achieve with having that as alternative? >Is that to support upstream binaries or something like that? yes, exactly the upstream version. G.

Bug#906239: stretch-pu: package libb2/0.97-2+deb9u1

On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 20:35:10 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 22:41 +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > The library has a serious issue in stable, because it tries to use > > AVX without knowing if it

Bug#911580: [britney2] missing trigger with breaks relationship

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Severity: normal As said, britney fails to add the appropriate trigger for virtualbox when a major release is out, and for this reason the ext-pack fails to install reliably on ci.d.o without additional manu

Bug#907679: please link key_packages.yaml.cgi from release.debian.org

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal As said, I find difficult to google for "debian key packages", and that udd page is not really shown on documentation, as jmm suggests, better have a link on release.debian.org, pointing to https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi thanks fo

Bug#906239: stretch-pu: package libb2/0.97-2+deb9u1

/debian/changelog 2018-08-15 22:33:56.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libb2 (0.97-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/60ea749837362c226e8501718f505ab138e5c19d.patch: +detect if the system can use AVX before actually using it +(Closes: #884958) + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna

Bug#831459: jessie-pu: package virtualbox-guest-additions-iso

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 20:52:32 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 17:45 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On 2016-09-29 14:37, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > > control: tags -1 -moreinfo >

Bug#837458: jessie-pu: package mactelnet/0.4.0-1

Hello Adam, On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 21:22:50 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 20:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2016-09-11 at 19:55 +0200, haakon.nessj...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Request for

Bug#837458: jessie-pu: package mactelnet/0.4.0-1

Hello Adam, On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:16:06 -0400 "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 14:26 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Control: tags -1 - confirmed > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > [...] > > while the version is good, we need some

Bug#886146: stretch-pu: package sqlcipher/3.2.0-2+deb9u1

> It'd be better for it to be fixed with a version, rather than imply it's > invalid. Changed that to reflect that the version that fixed it is: 3.4.1-1 > > Can you please also describe what if any testing was done on the > proposed update, and why this breakage wasn't caught before release? th

Bug#886146: stretch-pu: package sqlcipher/3.2.0-2+deb9u1

Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 11:48:12 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 17:59:07 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > > +sqlcipher (3.2.0-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium > > + > > + [ P

Bug#885027: stretch-pu: package mosquitto/1.4.10-3+deb9u1

Hello, >This is. :-) thanks and sorry for using it in the wrong way! G.

Bug#885027: stretch-pu: package mosquitto/1.4.10-3+deb9u1

control: tags -1 pending On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 14:47:51 + Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 01:39:12PM +, Roger Light wrote: > > I'm neither a DD nor a DM, should I just get my normal sponsor to > > upload or if not then who? > > yes, ask your usual sponsor to upload. > doing

Bug#888751: gdbm: bumping severity, transition has started

control: severity 888752 serious control: severity 888753 serious control: severity 888754 serious Hello, the fun has started. slgdbm started failing with 1.14.1 but not with 1.13, and this is the only regression I spotted in the complete rebuild test I did today. This is a QA package, and the

Bug#888751: transition: gdbm

>Let's do this. I'm rebuilding against 1.14.1, will upload to unstable in a few hours and raise bug reports to serious, in case nothing appears. G.

Bug#888751: transition: gdbm

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Hello Release team, I think it is time to do the transition. (KAction is MIA now, I prefer to not delay it any longer) Affected packages: am-utils apr-util clisp courier-authlib courierg

Bug#886146: stretch-pu: package sqlcipher/3.2.0-2+deb9u1

+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium + + [ Philipp Berger ] + * Fixup previous patch, to avoid a crash when opening file +(Closes: #863530) + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Sat, 02 Dec 2017 11:24:26 +0100 + thanks! Gianfranco diff -Nru sqlcipher-3.2.0/debian/changelog sqlcipher-3.2.0/debian/changelog

Bug#852849: jessie-pu: package keyringer/0.3.7-1

> Please go ahead. > ok uploaded. G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#877168: transition: ldc

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 02:02:30 +0100 Matthias Klumpp wrote: > Hi! > > 2017-10-04 13:36 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp : > > 2017-10-04 9:39 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort : > >> [...] > > Thank you! > > Both issues are reported upstream: > > ppc64el: https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/2356 >

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

Hello Dirk, >The "tag" you kids you badly wanted was introduced with 3.4.2, and hence as a >test with the to-be-replaced-anyway 3.4.1.20170921. > >In short, you seem to not really know what you're talking about. But at >least you make up for in volume. > >No, I played along as maintainer of r-bas

Re: Bug#868558: Would you please not upload new r-* packages until transition is finalised (Re: r-api-3.4)

Hello, >s/you/Seb/ to make it correct. Not my transition at all. who-uploads r-base Uploads for r-base: 3.4.2-1 to unstable: Dirk Eddelbuettel 3.4.1.20170921-1 to unstable: Dirk Eddelbuettel 3.4.1-2 to unstable: Dirk Eddelbuettel yes, I would say this is *your* transition. You tried your b

Bug#869414: package smplayer/16.11.0~ds0-1+deb9u1

>What about #870233, sounds like a good opportunity to fix that along? it was really too late for that one :) Mateusz, can you please prepare an update in case you want it fixed? G.

Bug#869414: package smplayer/16.11.0~ds0-1+deb9u1

On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:40:28 +0100 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 confirmed uploaded. G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#869762: NMU: libundead_1.0.6-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new ldc"

uild.com/Porting-from-autotools.html I think for now binNMUing is fine, but in the future splitting the package, and add that library shared is preferred (but please talk to D people, and try to understand how much the ABI is stable HTH G. Hi Gianfranco, On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:52:

Bug#869762: NMU: libundead_1.0.6-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new ldc"

>> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: binnmu >> >> nmu libundead_1.0.6-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new ldc72" >> >> For some reasons libundead changed some symbols with new ldc, and a rebuild >> of libundead fixes >>

Bug#869762: NMU: libundead_1.0.6-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new ldc"

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libundead_1.0.6-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new ldc72" For some reasons libundead changed some symbols with new ldc, and a rebuild of libundead fixes libbiod. thanks Gianfranco si

Bug#856240: jessie-pu: package elog/2.9.2+2014.05.11git44800a7-2+deb8u1

Hello, > I don't see see your package in jessie-new; the next jessie point release > is coming up shortly, so feel free to prod your sponsor again if you want > to have a chance of fixing this in jessie. :) > sponsored, sorry for the delay G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

Bug#866967: Bug#867149: RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu3+deb8u1

Hello, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "galternatives" into *oldstable* >(jessie-pu). uploaded. G. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#843701: jessie-pu: package boinc/7.4.23+dfsg-1

Hello Cyril, >Looks better to me, thanks. Feel free to upload. thanks! >Also, please use reply-all on the BTS. ack G.

Bug#864757: stretch-pu: package galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1

>Flagged for acceptance, thanks. thanks to you >(Please use reply-all on the BTS.) ack, I don't want to spam with double emails, but ok :) >FWIW this might make sense to fix this in jessie as well? If you agree, >feel free to open a jessie-pu bug report to track it. this is not something I k

Bug#866582: nmu: petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal nmu petsc_3.7.5+dfsg1-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against openmpi 2.1.1" as said on irc, I don't know why that check is so strict, but better safe than sorry and lets the stack m

Bug#843701: jessie-pu: package boinc/7.4.23+dfsg-1

yntax. (Closes: #841665) +- the xhost permissions syntax requires a "localuser" keyword for locally + specified users. + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 08 Nov 2016 21:53:59 +0100 + boinc (7.4.23+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release candidate. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#864757: stretch-pu: package galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1

> Looks good to me, feel free to upload. > uploaded. G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#864419: unblock: ettercap (CVE)

@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +ettercap (1:0.8.2-6) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Tweak 803.patch, disable asan. +(it is not intended for production) + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Thu, 08 Jun 2017 14:20:29 +0200 + ettercap (1:0.8.2-5) unstable; urgency=high [ Alexander Koeppe ] diff -Nru ettercap

Bug#864091: unblock: ettercap (CVE)

bad filters (Closes: #861604). +CVE-2017-8366 + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Sun, 04 Jun 2017 09:24:59 +0200 + ettercap (1:0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=high * debian/patches/626dc56686f15f2dda13c48f78c2a666cb6d8506.patch: diff -Nru ettercap-0.8.2/debian/patches/803.patch ettercap-0.8.2

Bug#864092: unblock: llvm-toolchain-3.8

correctly on +arm64 (Closes: #862360, #861484) + * debian/patches/asan-48bit-VMA-aarch64.patch: +- fix asan testsuite hang with some arm64 builders. + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Fri, 02 Jun 2017 15:11:29 +0200 + llvm-toolchain-3.8 (1:3.8.1-23) unstable; urgency=medium * Oups, same

Bug#863715: unblock: boinc 7.6.33+dfsg-12

(7.6.33+dfsg-12) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Steffen Moeller ] + * Added dependency on lsb-base (>= 3.0-6) of boinc-client for the init +script. Thanks to Lintian and the Package Tracker for spotting that. + + [ Gianfranco Costamagna ] + * Update the previous boinc-issue-1177.patch w

Bug#863645: unblock: cqrlog 2.0.2-1.1

Hi, >> unblock cqrlog/2.0.2-1.1 > >Doesn't seem to be in the archive? this is true, I forgot to mention this is in deferred/2, so you can see it as a pre-approval bug (this is an NMU for an RC I just opened) We might even avoid to pull the compatibility package by cherry-picking this upstream

Bug#863645: unblock: cqrlog 2.0.2-1.1

s: #848430) + * Depend on default-libmysqlclient-dev, to have the libmysqlclient.so +symlink available at runtime (function TdmData.GetMySQLLib +loads it dynamically Closes: #863644. + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Mon, 29 May 2017 17:29:07 +0200 + cqrlog (2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medi

Bug#861985: unblock: variety/0.6.3-5 (pre-upload approval)

control: tags -1 -moreinfo > Ack, please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag once the upload is in > unstable and have built on all relevant release architectures. > it should be ok now thanks! G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#861376: unblock: variety/0.6.3-4 (pre-upload approval)

control: tags -1 -moreinfo > Please go ahead with the upload and remove the moreinfo tag from this bug once > the package built on all the relevant architectures in unstable. > uploaded a few seconds ago :) thanks a lot! G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#860803: nmu: openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-4

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal nmu openldap_2.4.44+dfsg-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild after ppc64el bootstrap" I did successfully the ppc64el bootstrap, I think however a binNMU will make me confident that the bootst

Bug#860448: Bug#860598: RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-4 [RC]

control: tags 860448 -moreinfo Hello, >I am looking for a sponsor to upload an updated openldap package targeted at >stretch. The changes have already been pre-approved by the release team in >#860448. The upload fixes one RC bug and one important bug and updates the >debconf translations. Remov

Bug#860074: unblock: wxpython3.0/3.0.2.0+dfsg-4 wxwidgets3.0/3.0.2+dfsg-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello Release Team, a gtk bug has been reported to poedit users/developers, and it turned out to be a wxwidgets3.0/wxpython3.0 issue (poedit can't workaround it). I uploaded a fix in

Bug#859486: unblock: boinc/7.6.33+dfsg-11

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package boinc unblock boinc/7.6.33+dfsg-11 I'm asking to unblock, mainly because of bugs: LP: #1115607, BTS: #857218, #859352 I had to do some testing for the spawn shell

Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Hello, >> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break >> unrelated packages. As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes >> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new releases, probably a bunch of >> gtk-3 using programs as well. > >That's not usual for

Bug#857076: unblock: ettercap

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ettercap It fixes an CVE issue (no DSA), debdiff attached, I also added a few tweaks on non-release architectures (using lua on hurd, and not using it on mips64el, s

Bug#855109: unblock: pyrit/0.4.0-7.1

Hi, >This failed to build on i386. I saw it already, and I'm having difficulties in understanding why (builds fine on pbuilder sid i386, debomatic sbuild i386, bad on barriere i386 dchroot). Asked for help on -mentors mail list thanks G.

Bug#855109: unblock: pyrit/0.4.0-7.1

build failure with new python-scapy (Closes: #850692) + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:27:30 +0100 + pyrit (0.4.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium * d/control: diff -Nru pyrit-0.4.0/debian/patches/series pyrit-0.4.0/debian/patches/series --- pyrit-0.4.0/debian/patches/series 2016

Bug#854384: RM [RoM] virtualbox-guest-additions-iso

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal As said, for reasons including #794466, virtualbox-guest-additions-iso is not suitable for a Stable Release. please kick it out of testing, Gianfranco

Bug#837458: jessie-pu: package mactelnet/0.4.0-1

Control: tags -1 - confirmed Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:06:47 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sun, 2016-09-11 at 19:55 +0200, haakon.nessj...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Request for uploading to stable, as there is posted a CVE for a bug i

Bug#849962: jessie-pu: package libpng/1.2.50-2+deb8u3

+ + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Mon, 02 Jan 2017 18:21:33 +0100 + libpng (1.2.50-2+deb8u2) jessie-security; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload by the Security Team. diff -Nru libpng-1.2.50/debian/patches/CVE-2016-10087.patch libpng-1.2.50/debian/patches/CVE-2016-10087.patch --- libpng-1.2.50/debian/patches

Bug#843701: jessie-pu: package boinc/7.4.23+dfsg-1

control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hi, >Your mail client mangled the diff. sorry for that > the diff is simple:> + [ Tom Downes ] > + * Fix OOM_ADJ handling with a backportable approach > +(Closes: #843663) > > ^^ a typo in a variable name was preventing OOM_ADJ from being correctly set > i

Re: connman: libxtables.so.11 No such file or directory

control: severity -1 gravecontrol: reassign -1 src:iptablescontrol: found -1 1.6.0+snapshot20161117-1control: notfound -1 1.6.0-4control: affect -1 src:connmancontrol: retitle -1 "iptables: bumped library version without soname change, breaking reverse dependencies" Thanks Alf for reporting this

Bug#842699: nmu: lirc reverse-dependencies

control: tags -1 -moreinfo I removed the lirc block (after 10 days), and should migrate today: updated list: nmu audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to get rid of old liblircclient0 transitional dependency" nmu banshee-community-extensions_2.4.0-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebu

Bug#843701: jessie-pu: package boinc/7.4.23+dfsg-1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: jessie Severity: normal Boinc has a functionality problem in stable, the fix is already backported and I did upload a new version in unstable a few hours ago (just to make it backportable with older kernel

Bug#843420: nmu: datapacker_1.0.1+nmu2

control: reassign -1 src:datapacker >Can't binNMU it as it is uploaded and not installed. This may need a sourceful >upload (unless there's a way to convince wanna-build to binNMU it anyway, >possibly with wanna-build rather than the wb tool). I don't want to loose more of your precious time :)

Bug#843420: nmu: datapacker_1.0.1+nmu2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal nmu datapacker_1.0.1+nmu2 . armel . unstable . -m "rebuild to increase the version, due to armel haskell stack removal" as discussed over irc #buildd, that package got removed during haske

Bug#842699: nmu: lirc reverse-dependencies

Hi, >nmu ncmpc_0.24-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to get rid of old >liblircclient0 transitional dependency" >nmu squeezelite_1.8-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to get rid of old >liblircclient0 transitional dependency" they need an NMU (already in deferred queue), so not needed to binNM

Bug#842699: nmu: lirc reverse-dependencies

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Control: block -1 by 842695 Control: tags -1 moreinfo nmu audacious-plugins_3.7.2-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to get rid of old liblircclient0 transitional dependency" nmu banshee-commun

Bug#841203: libfl_pic.a needs more than a binNMU

Control: reopen -1 > > #837658 is different from many other PIE issues: > > This is a _pic.a library that includes the non-PIC objects instead of > the PIC objects it should contain. > > A binNMU with -fPIE would not fix the root cause that this library is > supposed to contain PIC code. > >

Bug#841203: nmu: flex_2.6.1-1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal nmu flex_2.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild with default fPIC flag (cfr: #837658)" please add an additional build dependency on gcc6_6.2.0-7 to be sure it picks up the flags, thanks!

Bug#840927: nmu: llvm-toolchain-3.8_1:3.8.1-12

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal nmu llvm-toolchain-3.8_1:3.8.1-12 . mips64el . unstable . -m "rebuild to fix wrongly removed binaries (cfr: #839033)" yes, such packages have been wrongly removed with the llvm-toolchain-sn

Bug#828097: Possible to keep old tidy?

Hi, (not sure why this bug is still open) >The upgrade of tidy to the newer version breaks what MediaWiki expects >(see test failures: >), and updating >MediaWiki to be compatible with the newer tidy isn't an option either: >

Bug#831459: jessie-pu: package virtualbox-guest-additions-iso

control: tags -1 -moreinfo > (I'm not removing moreinfo tag) removing it now. G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#831447: firefox-branding-iceweasel 0.4.0 MIGRATED to testing

Hi, >(I assume it's not bringing back /etc/iceweasel and /usr/share/iceweasel >(and probably a bunch of others). For Debian Edu the changed look is not >so much the problem as are changed pathes.) maybe you can ask as a feature to have symlinks :) (not sure if it works) Gianfranco

Bug#831447: firefox-branding-iceweasel 0.4.0 MIGRATED to testing

Hi Antonio and Holger, >> And while I applaud and understand why firefox-esr has replaced >> iceweasel in stable, I was also surprised. And I also saw Debian Edu >> stable break because of this… and we're still fixing it, waiting for >> 8.6 to bring these fixes to our users. >> >> (The latter i

Bug#831447: firefox-branding-iceweasel 0.4.0 MIGRATED to testing

Hi Adam! >You're answering a different question, namely "why". I was asking for >some information / pointers as to how you know they're being confused. >Presumably there are several mailing list posts, IRC conversations, etc. I didn't say the original statement, so I leave nord-stream answeri

Bug#831447: firefox-branding-iceweasel 0.4.0 MIGRATED to testing

Hi, >If they're interested, they can follow the bug. They don't all need to >be CCed on every message. Indeed, I follow the bug :) and I propose to drop the cc in the next message >Who are these "quite a few users"? Where are they being confused? because they used to have an iceweasel packa

Bug#831459: jessie-pu: package virtualbox-guest-additions-iso

, + CVE-2016-0495, CVE-2015-8104, + CVE-2015-7183, CVE-2015-5307, + CVE-2015-7183, CVE-2015-4813, + CVE-2015-4896, CVE-2015-3456 + + -- Gianfranco Costamagna Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:11:50 +0200 + virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (4.3.18-3) unstable; urgency=high * Reuploading the previous

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

, 2016 at 20:33, Tobias Frost wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2016, 15:33 + schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > Hi, > > > > Ack. :) > > > > I don't let you change your mind now :) > uploaded on debomatic-amd64, and on unstable a few seconds ago. > > lets

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

Hi, >Ack. :) I don't let you change your mind now :) uploaded on debomatic-amd64, and on unstable a few seconds ago. lets the *fun* start! BTW I added me and Tobias in uploaders list, as per private mail exchange with the current maintainers. thanks! Gianfranco

Bug#650601: R: Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

Ho dear Tobias and Emilio > Regarding libpng-config, I do not have a > complete list, but during the > rebuilds I > made a list of affected packages, but I faintly > remember > that there were at one-two others.  > They were leafpackages though, so no need > Also, I'm prepared to dedicated any

Bug#650601: libpng Package in experimental

Hi, > rename libpng16-tools to libpng-tools, > merge libpng16-devtools with libpng-dev. > > If and when poeple will want to have a multiarch development package, we will > split, patch and start > a new transition against ~50 packages not against ~500. > > We are almost ready, there is no need

  1   2   >