Re: C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Brian Nelson
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: >> Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what >> to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be >> rebuilt, and i

C++ transitions breaking libaspell

2006-01-02 Thread Brian Nelson
Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet another painful library transition. Obviously I don't want to do this unless absolutely

Re: C++ ABI transition for etch

2005-04-26 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:31:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of > > the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on > > libqt3, so it is en

Re: Some observations regardig the progress towards Debian 3.1

2003-11-16 Thread Brian Nelson
Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Adrian Bunk wrote: >> - testing, unstable or Debian 3.0 with backports aren't suitable for >> production systems > > Of course it is, Debian 3.0 with a few _selected_ backports works > nice, also on production systems. Err, do you realize you'r