On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 01:31:46AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 09:15:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > A proposal for a simplification, which reduces/avoids the renaming of > > the KDE packages. All KDE packages depend directly or indirectly on > > libqt3, so it is enough to rename the packages libqt3c102 to libqt3 > > and libqt3c102-mt to libqt3-mt and add a conflict with th old name. > > This way, you cannot install qt3 dependent packages which are built > > with different compiler versions. This avoids renaming about 100 out > > of 400 packages containing libraries. > > Ok, I'm now able to formulate the rationale for the question I had earlier > about this. Are we sure that all of these KDE apps *need* to depend on > libqt3c102-mt, or do they just do so because of classic libtool/pkg-config > bugs?
>From what I've seen, KDE apps use some Qt classes directly so it is necessary to link directly against qt-mt. For example, $ grep -r '^#include <q' filelight-0.6.4.1/src/ filelight-0.6.4.1/src/segmenttip.h:#include <qwidget.h> filelight-0.6.4.1/src/segmenttip.h:#include <qpixmap.h> filelight-0.6.4.1/src/filemap.cpp:#include <qapplication.h> //make() filelight-0.6.4.1/src/filemap.cpp:#include <qpainter.h> filelight-0.6.4.1/src/filemap.cpp:#include <qimage.h> //make() & paint() filelight-0.6.4.1/src/filemap.cpp:#include <qfont.h> filelight-0.6.4.1/src/filemap.cpp:#include <qfontmetrics.h> [...] -- Society is never going to make any progress until we all learn to pretend to like each other. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
