On Friday 26 March 2004 17.59, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> In the mean time I see Adrian has tagged this bug unreproducible.
Just to make sure nobody misunderstands: I propose downgrading as well, but I
haven't done that as (i) IANADD and (ii) I'm no regular bug-triage/qa
contributor either.
gree
tags 225048 +unreproducible
thanks
On Thursday 25 March 2004 12.28, Pascal Hakim wrote:
[dovecot]
> Doesn't this bug only happen in mbox files? You could simply drop mbox
> support, it appears to be working fine with maildir (which is how I
> suspect how must people are using it (I certain
On Thursday 25 March 2004 06.04, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > => remove sendmail/8.13.11.Beta0-1
> > #227464. Also #232664
>
> #232664 -- wow, sendmail and uucp, two of my favorite technologies, let
> me think about this one. ;p While I see in policy that it states rmail
> should be /usr/sbin/rmail
On Saturday 20 March 2004 21.22, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> remove libpng-dylan/2.3.10-4
> remove pointless/0.4-3
I guess coordinating (or at least systematically recording) removal requests
would really be good (see the mails from Colin Watson, today 16:35 and 16:38,
in case you missed it).
ch
On Saturday 20 March 2004 08.45, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Instead, it ships a single precompiled
> > ..pyc file supplied by upstream, which, according to README.SOURCE in the
> > source package, is created by concatenating all the source files and
> > running the result to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Clinging to sanity, Xan mumbled in his beard:
> 1) I think that the democratical election of codenames is essential
Why? A hypothetical Debian stinky will run exactly the same as a hypotetical
Debian potatoe will. There's no technical reason for chos
6 matches
Mail list logo
