Bug#1098235: transition: flac

2025-02-17 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: f...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:flac User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team, please provide a transition slot for flac. To cite the upstream changelog: "As there have been add

Processed: transition: flac

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:flac Bug #1098235 [release.debian.org] transition: flac Added indication that 1098235 affects src:flac -- 1098235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098235 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1098229: bookworm-pu: package node-csstype/3.1.1-1~deb12u1

2025-02-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: node-csst...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:node-csstype User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] FTBFS: https://bugs.debian.org/1078884 [ Tests ] Just rebuild [ Risks ] None [ C

Processed: bookworm-pu: package node-csstype/3.1.1-1~deb12u1

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:node-csstype Bug #1098229 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package node-csstype/3.1.1-1~deb12u1 Added indication that 1098229 affects src:node-csstype -- 1098229: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098229 Debian Bug Tracking Syste

Bug#1098225: bookworm-pu: package node-minipass/3.3.6+~cs9.4.19-1~deb12u1

2025-02-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: node-minip...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:node-minipass User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] FTBFS https://bugs.debian.org/1098224 [ Impact ] None [ Tests ] Build, autopkgt

Processed: bookworm-pu: package node-minipass/3.3.6+~cs9.4.19-1~deb12u1

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:node-minipass Bug #1098225 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package node-minipass/3.3.6+~cs9.4.19-1~deb12u1 Added indication that 1098225 affects src:node-minipass -- 1098225: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098225 Debian Bug T

Bug#1098223: bookworm-pu: package node-redis/4.5.1+~1.1.2-1~deb12u1

2025-02-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: node-re...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:node-redis User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] FTBFS https://bugs.debian.org/1078892 [ Impact ] None [ Tests ] Rebuild [ Risks ] N

Processed: bookworm-pu: package node-redis/4.5.1+~1.1.2-1~deb12u1

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:node-redis Bug #1098223 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package node-redis/4.5.1+~1.1.2-1~deb12u1 Added indication that 1098223 affects src:node-redis -- 1098223: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098223 Debian Bug Tracking Syst

Bug#1096090: transition: ppp

2025-02-17 Thread Chris Boot
On 17/02/2025 14:17, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Go ahead. I have uploaded 2.5.2-1+1 to unstable. I'll give you a shout in a day or two to start issuing binNMUs of the rdeps, unless you get there before me. Thanks, Chris -- Chris Boot bo...@debian.org

Bug#1098220: bookworm-pu: package node-rollup/3.15.0-2

2025-02-17 Thread Jérémy Lal
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm X-Debbugs-Cc: node-rol...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:node-rollup User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu [ Reason ] FTBFS https://bugs.debian.org/1078895 [ Risks ] None [ Checklist ] [x] *all* chan

Processed: bookworm-pu: package node-rollup/3.15.0-2

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:node-rollup Bug #1098220 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package node-rollup/3.15.0-2 Added indication that 1098220 affects src:node-rollup -- 1098220: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1098220 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact o

NEW changes in stable-new

2025-02-17 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: thunderbird_128.7.0esr-1~deb12u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: thunderbird_128.7.0esr-1~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: thunderbird_128.7.0esr-1~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: thunderbird_128.7.

Bug#1093902: several binNMUs for bugs found on amd64.reproduce.debian.net

2025-02-17 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Sebastian, new list: amd64: rocsolver rust-smithay-client-toolkit-0.16 rust-tracing-chrome libvmod-selector xsd trilinos rust-wat rust-tower-test i386: hisat2 libxinerama nanopolish rtags sga slxfig sxmo-utils tcpick tcl-signal tinyxml2 ucl usb-modeswitch whipper uncalled wavbreaker wiredp

Bug#1096036: transition: coq 8.20.1

2025-02-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/02/2025 16:20, Julien Puydt wrote: Le lundi 17 février 2025 à 15:20 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : On 15/02/2025 15:18, Julien Puydt wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.o

Bug#1096036: transition: coq 8.20.1

2025-02-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/02/2025 15:18, Julien Puydt wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers A new upstream version of Coq is out ; it requires rebuilding all depend

Processed: Re: Bug#1094440: transition: xnnpack and onednn for PyTorch 2.6

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1094440 [release.debian.org] transition: xnnpack, onednn, pytorch{,-cuda} Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1094440: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094440 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1094440: transition: xnnpack and onednn for PyTorch 2.6

2025-02-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 07/02/2025 11:11, Shengqi Chen wrote: Hi, 2025年2月2日 11:00,Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 写道: Yes, I noticed that xnnpack in experimental depends on pytorch/experimental. I think this should be the reversed way (pytorch depends on xnnpack)? But pytorch is causing aut

Bug#1096201: bookworm-pu: package djoser/2.1.0-1

2025-02-17 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: djo...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:djoser [ Reason ] I'm currently onboarding for doing LTS updates and picked djoser as my first target from the "d

Processed: bookworm-pu: package djoser/2.1.0-1

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:djoser Bug #1096201 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package djoser/2.1.0-1 Added indication that 1096201 affects src:djoser -- 1096201: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian

Processed: Re: Bug#1096090: transition: ppp

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1096090 [release.debian.org] transition: ppp Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1096090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096090 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1096090: transition: ppp

2025-02-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 16/02/2025 00:32, Chris Boot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ppp User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello Release Team friends, I have uploaded ppp

Bug#1092505: transition: opencv

2025-02-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/02/2025 01:53, M. Zhou wrote: On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 11:48 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Control: tags -1 confirmed The numpy 2 transition shouldn't be a blocker, as numpy rdeps can migrate to testing freely. As it's taking a while to get it sorted out, let's go ahead with this one.

Bug#1095779: marked as done (transition: simdjson)

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:33:03 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1095779: transition: simdjson has caused the Debian Bug report #1095779, regarding transition: simdjson to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1093620: transition: gnustep-multiarch

2025-02-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/02/2025 00:33, Yavor Doganov wrote: On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:03:24 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 10/02/2025 11:02, Yavor Doganov wrote: mpdcon.app viewpdf.app Scheduled. Hopefully, this should be the last action from your side (the very last would be the

Bug#1096014: marked as done (nmu: mumudvb_1.7.1-1)

2025-02-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:25:38 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1096014: nmu: mumudvb_1.7.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096014, regarding nmu: mumudvb_1.7.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#1094242: (mini)transition: perl 5.40.1

2025-02-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 16/02/2025 22:39, Niko Tyni wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:03:24AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: It is ABI compatible with 5.40.0, but will need five packages to be rebuilt, because they have strict dependencies on the upstream version for various reasons [1]. nmu libpar-packe

Bug#1082237: transition: numpy 2

2025-02-17 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:57:14PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > > > I removed the packages that were failing to build, but there's a few that > > > are good in the tracker but are failing their autopkgtests. Some of them > > > don't have bugs filed. Can you look at them [1] and file bugs as