Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:33:03 +0100
with message-id <f08ce2c9-a185-4432-8476-667065fda...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1095779: transition: simdjson
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095779,
regarding transition: simdjson
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1095779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: simdj...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:simdjson
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi release team,
The new upstream release of simdjson bumped the SOVERSION, so we
need to handle the transition as usual.
There are only two reverse dependencies, pcm and nodejs, both
can be successfully built on amd64 locally.
The automatic ben file is correct, but I don't know why nodejs
is missing from the transition tracker:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-simdjson.html
$ apt show libnode127 | grep simdjson
There is the dependency on libsimdjson23.
Ben file:
title = "simdjson";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libsimdjson23" | .depends ~ "libsimdjson25";
is_good = .depends ~ "libsimdjson25";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libsimdjson23";
Thank you for using reportbug
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 14/02/2025 19:29, M. Zhou wrote:
On Wed, 2025-02-12 at 09:12 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Go ahead.
Uploaded. And the transition seems finished:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-simdjson.html
Ack, let's close this.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
