Processed: nmu: pandoc-sidenote_0.23.0-1

2024-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:pandoc-sidenote Bug #1088931 [release.debian.org] nmu: pandoc-sidenote_0.23.0-1 Added indication that 1088931 affects src:pandoc-sidenote -- 1088931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088931 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...

Bug#1088797: transition: libfm-qt

2024-12-02 Thread 陳昌倬
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 08:47:36PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > We request to have transition for libfm-qt for Qt6. All affected > > packages are built in experimental. > > Go ahead. > > Emilio libfm-qt upstream has another soversion bump in latestm version. Shall we send another tra

Bug#1088699: bookworm-pu: package llvm-toolchain-19/19.1.4-1~deb12u1

2024-12-02 Thread Andres Salomon
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:24:21 -0500 Andres Salomon wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu We're overdue for a bookworm llvm backport. I originally tested llvm 19.1.3-2, but since 19.1.4-1 has been uploaded I'v

Re: Bug#1086128: src:sbcl: fails to migrate to testing for too long

2024-12-02 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon 02 Dec 2024 at 07:38am +01, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi ppc64el porters, Sean, > > @porters, can you please have a look at the ppc64el autopkgtest regressions > caused by sbcl [1]? > > On 12/2/24 03:36, Sean Whitton wrote: >> I don't think I can do anything about this bug. Upstream are

Bug#1088205: transition: varnish 7.6.1

2024-12-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 02/12/2024 20:07, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Dec 02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: With some help from Graham to schedule libvmod-redis tests with the unstable rebuilds, varnish has migrated to testing. Indeed, I was wondering: do I need to do something different next time? The point is that i

Bug#1088205: transition: varnish 7.6.1

2024-12-02 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 02, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > With some help from Graham to schedule libvmod-redis tests with the unstable > rebuilds, varnish has migrated to testing. Indeed, I was wondering: do I need to do something different next time? The point is that in these transitions varnish and its modul

Processed: transition: libqtxdg

2024-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:libqtxdg Bug #106 [release.debian.org] transition: libqtxdg Added indication that 106 affects src:libqtxdg -- 106: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=106 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p

Bug#1088886: transition: libqtxdg

2024-12-02 Thread 陳昌倬
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: libqt...@packages.debian.org, team+l...@tracker.debian.org, pkg-deepin-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org, team+ky...@tracker.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:libqtxdg User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi,

Bug#1088205: marked as done (transition: varnish 7.6.1)

2024-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:48:34 +0100 with message-id <82bc64ae-ef8d-4f06-874a-b7205bdc6...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1088205: transition: varnish 7.6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1088205, regarding transition: varnish 7.6.1 to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#1085169: marked as done (nmu: reform-firedecor_2023-10-23-4)

2024-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2024 11:50:38 +0100 with message-id <0d56a4dc-c9d3-4281-9f03-7ca65acd1...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1085169: nmu: reform-firedecor_2023-10-23-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1085169, regarding nmu: reform-firedecor_2023-10-23-4 to be marked as done. Thi

Processed: severity of 1088843 is normal

2024-12-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # p-u bugs are severity:normal > severity 1088843 normal Bug #1088843 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package proftpd-dfsg/1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u4 Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if y