Processing changes file: swupdate_2020.11-2+deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swupdate_2020.11-2+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: symfony_4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u4_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swupdate_2020.11-2+deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swupdate_2020.11-2+deb11u1_mips6
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_i386-buil
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1052561 - moreinfo
Bug #1052561 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package nfdump/1.7.3-1
(pre-discussion)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1052561: https://bugs.debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1051024 - moreinfo
Bug #1051024 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
igtf-policy-bundle/1.122-1~deb12u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1051024: https://bugs.deb
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_s390x-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swupdate_2020.11-2+deb11u1_arm64
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1054466 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package localslackirc/1.17-1.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1054466: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:27:57AM +0200, Salvo "LtWorf" Tomaselli wrote:
> Slack now requires some headers to connect to the websocket, that were not
> needed before.
>
> This patch is to backport the sending of those headers, so that localslackirc
> can connect to it.
Dear Security, Release and Wanna-build teams,
As some of you may be aware, we (the LTS Team) are reviewing the
packages with limitations in their support, and I would like to bring
some discussion regarding Go, Rust and the like. As the bookworm (and
older) release notes document:
The Debian
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 06:47:42PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> diff -Nru needrestart-3.6/debian/changelog needrestart-3.6/debian/changelog
> --- needrestart-3.6/debian/changelog 2023-05-31 10:47:03.0 -0400
> +++ needrestart-3.6/debian/changelog 2023-11-15 15
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1056358 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package needrestart/3.6-4+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1056358: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056358
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1057089 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package usrmerge/37~deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1057089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 03:46:30PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> Improve the usrmerge experience in bookworm.
> A few more ancient packages were found that need to be removed first for
> usrmerge to succeed, add versioned Breaks against them.
> Depending o
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1056969 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
swupdate/2022.12+dfsg-4+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1056969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1056969
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 12:09:33PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> There is a local privilege escalation in swupdate package because the
> service's control socket has world-writable file permissions.
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1058928 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
cryptsetup/2:2.6.1-4~deb12u2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1058928: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058928
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 02:10:20PM +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> [ Reason ]
>
> 1. cryptsetup-suspend 2:2.6.1-4~deb12u1 was found incompatible with
> systemd 254.1-3 and later, in particular with systemd/bookworm-backports.
>
> 2. cryptsetup-initramfs 2:2.6.1-4~deb
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 02:42:56PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> On 21/12/2023 09:41, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
> > using apt unsupported until we no longer deal with aliasing?
>
> I incline towards "no"; if an upgrade has faile
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1059235 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package fish/3.6.0-3.1+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1059235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:06:23PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Can you as well add a bug closer for #1057455?
And a brief description of what the vulnerability actually is, please. You
can go ahead with those changes.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1058938 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
onionprobe/1.0.0+ds-2.1+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1058938: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058938
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with prob
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 03:21:27PM +, Georg Faerber wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> On bullseye, this works without a warning:
> $ tor --hash-password some-string
> 16:A871A161E60E3C3960934C88AA783AC6B693DF63CF7897CA5E87219E26
>
> Whereas on bookworm, this throws a warning:
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1053997 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package curl/7.74.0-1.3+deb11u11
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1053997: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053997
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 04:22:12PM +0100, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> This change provides DEB_VERSION on "--version" output.
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1025789 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: wolfssl/4.6.0+p1-0+deb11u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1025789: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025789
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1025789 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: wolfssl/4.6.0+p1-0+deb11u2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1025789 to the same tags previously set
--
1025789: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025789
Debian Bug Tracking Syste
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 08:10:34PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote:
> Please find a version with an additional fix for CVE-2023-3724 attached.
> diff -Nru wolfssl-4.6.0+p1/debian/changelog wolfssl-4.6.0+p1/debian/changelog
> --- wolfssl-4.6.0+p1/debian/changelog 2022-03-17
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #993809 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package segemehl/0.3.4-3+deb11u1
(Pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
993809: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993809
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Processing changes file: gnutls28_3.7.1-5+deb11u4_multi.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swupdate_2020.11-2+deb11u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: symfony_4.4.19+dfsg-2+deb11u4_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: zeromq3_4.3.4-1+deb11u1_source.changes
ACCEP
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 12:51:31AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 3 December 2021 9:41:48 pm IST, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 12:27:05AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >> diff -Nru segemehl-0.3.4/debian/patches/arm64.patch
> >> segemehl-0.3.4/debian/
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_115.6.0esr-1~deb12u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_115.6.0esr-1~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_115.6.0esr-1~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: firefox-esr_115.6.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1002956 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package rabbitmq-server/3.8.9-3
CVE-2021-32718, CVE-2021-32719
Bug #1004513 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package rabbitmq-server/3.8.9-3
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1002956 to the same ta
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1002956 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package rabbitmq-server/3.8.9-3
CVE-2021-32718, CVE-2021-32719
Bug #1004513 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package rabbitmq-server/3.8.9-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1002956: h
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:12:20PM -0500, Alex Vandiver wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Aug 2022 19:09:05 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> > + * Stop moving mv /etc/rabbitmq/rabbitmq.conf
> > /etc/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-env.conf.
> >
> > This could do with an explanation as to _w
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 britney2 wrong installability block in autopkgtest
Bug #1059226 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Help doris migrate to
testing
Changed Bug title to 'britney2 wrong installability block in autopkgtest' from
'release.debian.org: Help doris migrate
Control: retitle -1 britney2 wrong installability block in autopkgtest
Hi Bas,
On 21-12-2023 14:06, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
doris (5.0.3~beta+dfsg-17) is not migrating to testing, the excuses suggest
this is due to superficial autopkgtests:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=doris
No
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:16:22PM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bookworm
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: f...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:fish
>
>
> [ Reason ]
>
> Cherry-pick
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 04:30:08PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I've updated this update request for adding 3 more lines to
> security-support-ended.deb11 (and updating d/changelog)
Please go ahead.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1054189 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1054189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1054189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:13:03PM +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> A version of this pu has already been accepted for Bookworm. I have cribbed
> liberally from the bookworm-pu bug report.
>
> nftables bug: https://bugs.debian.org/1051592
> bookworm-pu bug: https://bugs.de
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #1053816 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
nftables/0.9.8-3.1+deb11u2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1053816: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1053816
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1057180 + moreinfo
Bug #1057180 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package mariadb-10.5
1:10.5.23-0+deb11u1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1057180: https://bugs.debian.
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:31:55PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:19:48AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > > Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
> > > using apt unsupported
Hi Soren,
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:48:44PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> On Thursday, December 21, 2023 3:00:23 AM MST Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > Just one particular class (QQuickWebEngineDownloadItem) is private. My guess
> > is that it’s upstream oversight, because upstream documentation even
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1053608 = bullseye pending
Bug #1053608 [release.debian.org] bullseye-p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1055988 = bullseye pending
Bug #1055988 [release.debian.org] bullseye-p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1057137 = bullseye pending
Bug #1057137 [release.debian.org] bullseye-p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 1056970 = bullseye pending
Bug #1056970 [release.debian.org] bullseye-p
package release.debian.org
tags 1057137 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: gnutls28
Version: 3.7.1-5+de
package release.debian.org
tags 1056970 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: swupdate
Version: 2020.11-2+
package release.debian.org
tags 1055988 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: symfony
Version: 4.4.19+dfsg
package release.debian.org
tags 1053608 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: zeromq3
Version: 4.3.4-1+deb
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:fish
Bug #1059235 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package fish/3.6.0-3.1+deb12u1
Added indication that 1059235 affects src:fish
--
1059235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: f...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:fish
[ Reason ]
Cherry-pick upstream fix to CVE-2023-49284
[ Impact ]
This is a low severity security issue tha
Am 21.12.23 um 11:50 schrieb Christoph Berg:
Re: Helmut Grohne
Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
using apt unsupported until we no longer deal with aliasing?
If the answer is yes here, we'll close #1058937 (Ben's libnfsidmap1 bug)
with no action calling the s
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 15:31:55 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Do those GUI frontends that work via packagekit or other frameworks
> count as "using apt"?
Managing apt/dpkg packages via packagekit uses libapt-pkg6.0 (via
/usr/lib/*/packagekit-backend/libpk_backend_apt.so). I don't know whether
that's
Hi,
On 21/12/2023 09:41, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
using apt unsupported until we no longer deal with aliasing?
I incline towards "no"; if an upgrade has failed part-way (as does
happen), people may then reasonably use dpkg dir
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 11:19:48AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
> > using apt unsupported until we no longer deal with aliasing?
>
> I think so, yes. I don't
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> ## Upgrading using dpkg directly?
>
> We already have quite a number of packages that use Conflicts to prevent
> file loss in upgrades in a very similar way to #1058937 (Ben's
> libnfsidmap1 bug) even in released versions of Debian.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
doris (5.0.3~beta+dfsg-17) is not migrating to testing, the excuses suggest
this is due to superficial autopkgtests:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=doris
Should this really block testi
Re: Helmut Grohne
> Is it ok to call upgrade scenarios failures that cannot be reproduced
> using apt unsupported until we no longer deal with aliasing?
>
> If the answer is yes here, we'll close #1058937 (Ben's libnfsidmap1 bug)
> with no action calling the scenario unsupported.
I think we shoul
Hi,
this installment serves a dual purpose. Let me first give an update of
the status quo and then pose a consensus question on how we want to deal
with a particular problem.
I Cc d-release@l.d.o as upgrades are an integral part of releases.
I Cc d-ctte@l.d.o for advisory feedback with experience
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 02:06:28PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> I must admit that I have no personal experience with connecting QML and C++.
I don’t have any personal experience with that too.
> But it seems to me from the documentation Qt has produced there are several
> ways to bridge the two
64 matches
Mail list logo
