Your message dated Mon, 24 Sep 2018 06:04:00 +
with message-id <23adf021-aa9c-c93d-4182-e401b9607...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#909454: nmu: gdb_8.1.90-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #909454,
regarding nmu: gdb_8.1.90-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gdb_8.1.90-1 . amd64 i386 x32 . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libipt2."
This binNMU is the mini-transition of intel-processor-trace in
experimental.
Andreas
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018 at 08:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I noticed at least 13 packages that have boost-related changes in an
> > > Ubuntu diff (and
On Sunday, September 23, 2018 2:59:10 AM CDT Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I would suggest to avoid too much speculation on this point: uploading a
> new release to unstable is alone rather time consuming, because (beside
> the technical challenges of correctly installing dozens of binary
> package
On 2018-09-23 19:43, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 15:40 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Followup-For: Bug #902582
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the ben file is bad since it misses -dbg packages, the following
>> should
>> work better:
>>
>> is_affected = .build-depends ~ /python3-all-dev/;
>>
On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 15:40 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #902582
>
> Hi,
>
> the ben file is bad since it misses -dbg packages, the following
> should
> work better:
>
> is_affected = .build-depends ~ /python3-all-dev/;
> is_good = .depends ~ /python3 \(<< 3\.8\)/ | .depend
Your message dated Sun, 23 Sep 2018 14:00:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#909273: nmu: ros-rosconsole_1.13.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #909273,
regarding nmu: ros-rosconsole_1.13.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Followup-For: Bug #902582
Hi,
the ben file is bad since it misses -dbg packages, the following should
work better:
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /python3-all-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ /python3 \(<< 3\.8\)/ | .depends ~ /python3.7/ |
/python3-dbg \(<< 3\.8\)/ | .depends ~ /python3.7-dbg/;
is_b
Hi Niels
On 23 September 2018 at 13:00, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I intend to submit this next week and make 29-30/9 the first weekend to
> have the increased delay assuming there is consensus.
...
> At the moment, I have no plans to change the urgency=high exemption as a
> part of this change.
Wou
Ian Jackson:
> Paul Gevers writes ("Are we ready to block on autopkgtest regressions?"):
>> Three days ago I opened a merge request against brintey2 [1] to
>> enable britney2 to block migrations that cause regressions in
>> autopkgtest results in testing. Niels copied it to the IRC channel,
>> but
at bottom :-
On 23/09/2018, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would suggest to avoid too much speculation on this point: uploading a
> new release to unstable is alone rather time consuming, because (beside
> the technical challenges of correctly installing dozens of binary
> packages)
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html
I'd like to do the libpodofo mini transition.
I've test built the 4 rdeps and they all built fine with 0.9.6.
--
regards,
Hi,
Il 23/09/18 09:38, Adrian Bunk ha scritto:
> What is the version planned to be shipped in buster?
>
> 1.68 is already released, and 1.69 will be released in December.
>
> IMHO doing 1.62 -> 1.67 -> 1.68 would not make sense at this point.
>
> Better options would be:
> 1.62 -> 1.68 -> 1.69
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 11:16, Niels Thykier wrote:
>...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed at least 13 packages that have boost-related changes in an
> > Ubuntu diff (and I certainly have *not* checked all packages in the
> > boost tran
14 matches
Mail list logo
