Bug#904545: dw: irssi-plugin-otr_1.0.2-4 irssi-plugin-robustirc_0.6-4 irssi-plugin-xmpp_0.54-2

2018-07-24 Thread Rhonda D'Vine
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, please binNMU the irssi plugins for the last irssi upload. I did a local test build to confirm that they don't need any source change. So long, Rhonda dw irssi-plugin-otr_1.0.2

Bug#904533: nmu: openrpt_3.3.14-1~bpo9+1

2018-07-24 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu openrpt_3.3.14-1~bpo9+1 . amd64 . stretch-backports . -m "Rebuild in a clean stretch environment." libopenrpt1v5 (3.3.14-1~bpo9+1) is currently uninstallable in stretch(-backports):

Processed: Re: RM: martian-modem/20080625-2

2018-07-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 904483 ftp.debian.org Bug #904483 [release.debian.org] RM: martian-modem/20080625-2 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #904483 to the same values previous

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 07/24/2018 08:43 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Perhaps just babble and FUD: There was (and probably still is) an issue > in powerpc: In a certain package, upstream's compile options for ppc had > higher CPU requirements than what Debian uses for that architecture. As > a result, the buildd (some

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Christoph Biedl
Adrian Bunk wrote... > I'd like to get a clear picture regarding the situation of building > armel for buster on arm64, ideally moving it to arm64 hardwre soon. JFTR, I'd appreciate if armel/armhf could continue to be part of a release. > 1. What issues are considered possible problems for movi

Bug#904483: RM: martian-modem/20080625-2

2018-07-24 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 24.07.2018 um 18:53 schrieb Dererk: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: rm > > Dear RT. > > Please remove martian-modem from the Debian Archive. > > There are several reasons why to do so, first of all this software > pro

Bug#904483: RM: martian-modem/20080625-2

2018-07-24 Thread Dererk
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Dear RT. Please remove martian-modem from the Debian Archive. There are several reasons why to do so, first of all this software provides kernel+user space support for quite ancient i386 hardwa

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:22:36AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 07:27:15AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>... >> The next big problem I can see is in our haskell packages for >> armhf. From my build log for haskell-zxcvbn-c_1.0.1-4.log (as an >> example): >> >> ... >> Setting

Re: Building armel on arm64

2018-07-24 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 07:27:15AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >... > The next big problem I can see is in our haskell packages for > armhf. From my build log for haskell-zxcvbn-c_1.0.1-4.log (as an > example): > > ... > Setting up llvm-3.9 (1:3.9.1-19+b1) ... > Setting up ghc (8.2.2-4) ... > Ill