On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 05:10:54PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/03/16 13:25, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> > Emilio,
> >
> > I think we're quite close to be able to drop 2.2 - it's already in
> > experimental, we're quite confident it works, etc.
> >
> > Right now we know that u
Dear Patrick,
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:36:46 PM Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 15.02.2016 um 14:14 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> > And this is why I provided some hints how you can address those problems
> > in my bug report. This is why I wrote to you after when I stabilised
> > "ckeditor" so you could use
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:51:26 -0800
with message-id <20160302205126.ga13...@smetana.kardiogramm.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#814930: jessie-pu: package hplip/3.15.11+repack0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #814930,
regarding jessie-pu: package hplip/3.15.11+repack0-1
to be marked
On mer., 2016-03-02 at 20:06 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Before considering that, did anyone approch grsecurity whether we can get
> access to the grsecurity stable patches? We would most definitely have Debian
> funds to become grsecurity sponsors to obtain access to stable patches.
I thin
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:09:47AM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hi teams,
>
> [first of all, I'm writing this with my linux-grsec hat, not my Debian
> security team member hat, obviously]
>
> As you may know, src:linux-grsec was accepted in unstable earlier this year.
> As a quick summary, t
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 17:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > Does that mean there was manual intervention? Or is that automatic
> > behaviour? Does it ignore all->any dependencies on !x86?
>
> It was all automatic. britney only requires that arch:all packages are
On 2016-03-01 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/03/16 20:25, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> nmu hugin_2015.0.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
>> libvigraimpex6"
>> nmu enblend-enfuse_4.1.4+dfsg-5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
>> libvigraimpex6"
>> both hugin and enblend-
On 2016-03-02 17:22, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 17:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 02/03/16 13:24, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Source: linux-tools
> > Version: 4.4-4
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > n
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 17:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 02/03/16 13:24, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > > Source: linux-tools
> > > Version: 4.4-4
> > > Severity: important
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > new major upstream release
On 01/03/16 20:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Thanks. I'll upload gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) to unstable shortly.
binNMUs scheduled.
Emilio
On 02/03/16 13:24, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Source: linux-tools
>> Version: 4.4-4
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> new major upstream releases (e.g. 4.4) of src:linux and src:linux-tools
>> should migrate together to testing. Right
Your message dated Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:15:52 +0100
with message-id <56d711b8.6010...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#816499: nmu: votca-csg_1.2.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #816499,
regarding nmu: votca-csg_1.2.4-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
On 02/03/16 13:25, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Emilio,
>
> I think we're quite close to be able to drop 2.2 - it's already in
> experimental, we're quite confident it works, etc.
>
> Right now we know that uwsgi and weechat will need manual fixing and
> there are open bugs against them (#8163
On 02/03/16 12:46, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer., 2016-02-03 at 14:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> [Context: packages shipping /bin with “funny” permissions, seen in stable.]
>>
>> Yves-Alexis Perez (2016-02-03):
>>>
>>> On mar., 2016-02-02 at 17:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
* Yves-Alexis Perez , 2016-03-02, 12:46:
I did a quick check on a local mirror (which might be incomplete),
and found three packages with errors:
dpkg -c debian/pool/main/s/sed/sed_4.2.2-4+b1_amd64.deb |grep bin/$
drwxrwxr-x root/root 0 2014-11-08 19:28 ./bin/
dpkg -c debian/pool/main/l
* Christian Hofstaedtler [160302 13:25]:
> When do you think it would be ok for us to drop 2.2? We'll need
> another round of binNMUs for all the packages listed on the tracker.
> (We're running another test rebuild of those right now.)
>From our test rebuild, those packages failed:
Packages we
Hi Emilio,
> > (My*) plan'd be to upload (1) libpng12 WITHOUT providing libpng-dev and
> > (2) libpng16 WITH providing it.
> This hasn't been answered yet. That should be dealt with and a package should
> be
> uploaded to experimental with the necessary changes.
my opinion is: remove libpng-dev
Emilio,
I think we're quite close to be able to drop 2.2 - it's already in
experimental, we're quite confident it works, etc.
Right now we know that uwsgi and weechat will need manual fixing and
there are open bugs against them (#816315, #816312).
When do you think it would be ok for us to drop
On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 12:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Source: linux-tools
> Version: 4.4-4
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> new major upstream releases (e.g. 4.4) of src:linux and src:linux-tools
> should migrate together to testing. Right now src:linux-tools 4.4-4 is
> already in testin
On mer., 2016-02-03 at 14:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [Context: packages shipping /bin with “funny” permissions, seen in stable.]
>
> Yves-Alexis Perez (2016-02-03):
> >
> > On mar., 2016-02-02 at 17:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > >
> > > I didn't check the whole archive, but doing
Am 15.02.2016 um 14:14 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
I am aware of those issues, that is
also why the embedded-code-copies bug is marked as "need help".
And this is why I provided some hints how you can address those problems in
my bug report. This is why I wrote to you after when I stabilised "cked
I read this last week just before slipping into a fever in which I had
recurring dreams about the relations of unnameable abstract entities
that seemed later to correspond to software components.
On recovering from the flu, I was pleased to find that I hadn't
imagined that Niels Thykier wrote:
> H
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu votca-csg_1.2.4-2.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against votca-tools
1.3.0"
The last votca-tools upload started an (uncoordinated) mini-transition from
libvotca-tools2 to libvotca-too
Hi teams,
[first of all, I'm writing this with my linux-grsec hat, not my Debian
security team member hat, obviously]
As you may know, src:linux-grsec was accepted in unstable earlier this year.
As a quick summary, this is a source linux package (forked from and
periodically rebased against src:l
On 02/03/16 08:19, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 at 01:49:08 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> python3-defaults now no longer depends on python3.4, making python3.5 the
>> only supported python3 version. python3.4 should be removed before stretch
>> is released (mostly by binNMUing, an
On 02/03/16 08:53, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Dear wanna-build team,
>
> gdal (2.0.2+dfsg-1) FTBFS on mips64el due to a compiler segfault:
>
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/5/vector:69:0,
> from sdk/pcidsk_segment.h:34,
> from sdk/pcidsk_file.h:30,
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
