NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mesa_10.3.2-1+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mesa_10.3.2-1+deb8u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mesa_10.3.2-1+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing cha

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: nss_3.17.2-1.1+deb8u2_mips.changes ACCEPT

Bug#791215: netcdf: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 00:11:07 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > We mostly need BinNMUs for the other packages in dependency level 1 now. > This includes gdal which has it's own upcoming transition #756867, I'd > like to start that transition soon. > Alright, go ahead. Cheers, Julien sig

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processi

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mesa_10.3.2-1+deb8u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nss_3.17.2-1.1+deb8u2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nss_3.17.2-1.1+deb8u2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nss_3.17.2-1.1+deb8u2_s390x.changes ACCEPT

Bug#791215: netcdf: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 19-08-15 20:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > We still need the updated transition tracker, but in the mean time my > (manually updated) test tracker can be used: > > http://linuxminded.nl/tmp/pkg-grass-transitions/html/netcdf.html > > I'll NMU to DELAYED/2 all packages with patches for outst

Processed: bug 791215 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/netcdf.html

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 791215 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/netcdf.html Bug #791215 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf (GCC 5) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/netcdf.html'. > thanks Stopping proc

Processed: Blocks netcdf transition

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #791215 transition: netcdf (GCC 5) > #794230 adios: Build dependency on libnetcdff-dev required for netcdf > block 791215 by 794230 Bug #791215 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf (GCC 5) 791215 was blocked by: 793823 794027 793976 793885 7940

Bug#796161: RM: cameramonitor/oldstable -- ROM; RC bug open over 2000 days, depends on python-support which is pending removal.

2015-08-19 Thread Harlan Lieberman-Berg
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal cameramonitor has a grave bug open for over 2000 days which renders the package completely nonfunctional. It is currently built with python-support, which is itself deprecated and pending removal.

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:53:04 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 19.08.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Simon McVittie: > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 at 13:04:27 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >> I would like to request a transition for bullet due to a SONAME bump in > >> the latest version 2.83.5 as soon as G

Processed: tagging 796115

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 796115 + jessie Bug #796115 [release.debian.org] RM: php-zend-xml/1.0.0-1 Added tag(s) jessie. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 796115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796115 D

Bug#791215: netcdf: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 18:34:03 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > The automatically created auto-netcdf tracker is not sufficient to track > the new C++ & Fortran packages. I've attached the ben configuration I > used for my pkg-grass-transitions tracker in the preparation of this > transitio

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: groovy2_2.2.2+dfsg-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gtk+3.0_3.14.5-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mesa_10.3.2-1+deb8u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: nss_3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1_allonly.changes ACCEPT Processin

NEW changes in oldstable-new

2015-08-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u6_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u6_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u6_i386.changes ACCEPT Processi

Bug#795794: jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 21:50 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2015-08-16 at 22:51 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > > > This is a small patch from mozilla hg. It fixes

Processed: Re: Bug#795911: Upload of gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 to Jessie will be accepted by the Stable Release Managers

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #795911 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 795911: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795911 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#795911: Upload of gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 to Jessie will be accepted by the Stable Release Managers

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 17:13 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello Ruben Undheim. > > I've uploaded gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 now. Please finish things up > with the release team to get it accepted. Some more details below. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#793688: jessie-pu: package groovy2/2.2.2+dfsg-3

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #793688 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package groovy2/2.2.2+dfsg-3 Added tag(s) pending. -- 793688: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793688 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#793688: jessie-pu: package groovy2/2.2.2+dfsg-3

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sun, 2015-07-26 at 12:40 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > > It was reported a vulnerability on groovy2 that allow to execute > > arbitrary code remotely. For more information

Processed: Re: Bug#795947: jessie-pu: package mesa/10.3.2-1+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #795947 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mesa/10.3.2-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 795947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795947 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#795947: jessie-pu: package mesa/10.3.2-1+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 18:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 11:20 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > we've had a patch for #775264 sitting in git since January. This should > > go in jessie. Diff below, imagine its

Processed: Re: Bug#795794: jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #795794 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nss/3.17.2-1.1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 795794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=795794 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#793984: jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #793986 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 793986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793986 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#793984: jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:54 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > > It was reported a vulnerability on groovy that allow to execute > > arbitrary code remotely. For more information

Processed: Re: Bug#793984: jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #793984 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package groovy/1.8.6-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 793984: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793984 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#791215: netcdf: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01-08-15 03:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 30-07-15 18:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org > > With the recent updates to the netcdf packages in experimental we should > be ready for

Bug#796088: jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 04:49:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Thanks for looking into this so quickly. > > On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 13:22 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > the I'd like to update libvirt in unstable to fix the broken AppArmor > > I assume "stable"

Bug#796088: jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
I have to admit that I'm also confused by the patch for #786650: On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 13:22 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: +Subject: Allow access to libnl-3 config files [...] ++ /etc/libnl-3/classid r, ++ That seems to make sense... + # for hostdev + /sys/devices/ r, + /sys/devices/** r,

Bug#796088: jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 13:22 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > the I'd like to update libvirt in unstable to fix the broken AppArmor I assume "stable" :-) > support, a crash during live migration and a error handling problem > leading lots of users into the wrong direction

Processed: Re: Bug#796088: jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #796088 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 796088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796088 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#796112: jessie-pu: package syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #796112 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 796112: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796112 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#796112: jessie-pu: package syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 16:54 +0200, intrigeri wrote: > as reported on #780765, syslinux fails to boot on some Chromebooks. > > This was fixed in Ubuntu, Tails and Debian unstable between March and May, > with > the patches that the debdiff applies. Ubuntu and Tails us

Bug#795911: Upload of gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 to Jessie will be accepted by the Stable Release Managers

2015-08-19 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello Ruben Undheim. I've uploaded gtk+3.0/3.14.5-1+deb8u1 now. Please finish things up with the release team to get it accepted. Some more details below. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:25:53AM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote: > > I checked the svn repo. Revision r43867 seems to be the "golden" Jessie >

Bug#796115: RM: php-zend-xml/1.0.0-1

2015-08-19 Thread David Prévot
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please, remove php-zend-xml from Jessie (it’s not in Wheezy). It’s affected by CVE-2015-5161. Even if of low impact in Jessie (since PHP is already fixed), there is little point in keeping this u

Bug#796112: jessie-pu: package syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread intrigeri
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi release team, as reported on #780765, syslinux fails to boot on some Chromebooks. This was fixed in Ubuntu, Tails and Debian unstable between March and May, with the patches tha

Bug#796088: jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Guido Günther wrote (19 Aug 2015 11:22:58 GMT) : > the I'd like to update libvirt in unstable to fix the broken AppArmor > support, [...] I'd like to add that it feels important to me to fix these bugs in Jessie, in order to avoid creating a culture of "just disable AppArmor" among Debian use

Bug#796088: jessie-pu: package libvirt/1.2.9-9+deb8u1

2015-08-19 Thread Guido Günther
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, the I'd like to update libvirt in unstable to fix the broken AppArmor support, a crash during live migration and a error handling problem leading lots of users into the wrong dir

Bug#796084: nmu: vtk6_6.2.0+dfsg1-2

2015-08-19 Thread Anton Gladky
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Dear release team, please binNMU vtk6 to let liggghts solve dependency conflict. nmu vtk6_6.2.0+dfsg1-2 . ALL . unstable . -m "rebuild against libjsoncpp0v5" Thanks

Bug#796083: nmu: soqt_1.6.0~e8310f-2

2015-08-19 Thread Anton Gladky
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Dear release team, please binNMU sosqt to let freecad solve dependency conflict. nmu soqt_1.6.0~e8310f-2 . ALL . unstable . -m "rebuild against libcoin80v5" Thanks Anton

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.08.2015 um 11:44 schrieb Simon McVittie: > On 19/08/15 09:53, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I wonder why we cannot just rebuild the library and request binNMU's for >> the small number of reverse-dependencies > > Take it up with the release team if you want to do this, but I suspect > the reason

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On 19/08/15 09:53, Markus Koschany wrote: > I wonder why we cannot just rebuild the library and request binNMU's for > the small number of reverse-dependencies Take it up with the release team if you want to do this, but I suspect the reasons why not will go something like this: * binNMUs can't h

Bug#791026: ecasound: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 at 11:49:48 +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > ecasound needs a transition. I already uploaded the version with the renamed > package to experimental and tested that both reverse build dependencies > (libaudio-ecasound-perl and soundscaperenderer) build fine (soundscaperenderer

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

2015-08-19 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
"Adam D. Barratt" writes: > We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some > potential September dates: > > 5/6th - okay for me Should be okay, provided I get internet on Aug 31st as planned. > 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon > 19th/20th

Bug#790988: bullet: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.08.2015 um 01:55 schrieb Simon McVittie: > On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 at 13:04:27 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I would like to request a transition for bullet due to a SONAME bump in >> the latest version 2.83.5 as soon as GCC 5 is the new default. > > A version of 2.83.5 built with gcc 4 is in

Bug#791166: libsfml: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default

2015-08-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 at 11:26:30 +0100, James Cowgill wrote: > Can I upload this to unstable (it's in experimental)? The answer was yes. 2.3.1+dfsg-2 started this transition in unstable. S

Bug#791019: cxxtools library transition needed, patch attached

2015-08-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 at 10:06:36 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Yes, as per our dda mail anything that needs a libstdc++ followup > transition and whose dependencies are ready is fair game for upload to > unstable. I have uploaded Kari's changes to unstable so we can move on to the next mini-transi

Bug#795125: transition: libassimp3 -> libassimp3v5

2015-08-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 at 21:34:24 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > I have uploaded "assimp_3.1.1~dfsg-4" to "experimental". ... > Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all architectures. Packages in unstable are not binNMU'd against dependencies from experimental, and this t

Re: 8.2 and 7.9 planning

2015-08-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 19:52:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some > potential September dates: > > 5/6th - okay for me > 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon > 19th/20th - looks okay > 26t