Hello!
Ok, thanks for the review. If I revert the two bug fixes commented by
Julien below from the jessie branch, and nobody comments in X days,
then it is OK to upload 10.0.19 to Jessie?
2015-06-19 8:12 GMT+03:00 Julien Cristau :
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 00:12:52 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 00:26:07 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> In Sid, I added missing systemd .service files to the cloud-init package,
> because without them, the ordering when starting cloud-init is completely
> wrong. With the default OpenStack image at cdimage.debian.org, you may
> not find
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 00:12:52 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > + * Security: improved hardening flags (hardening=+all,-pie)
> >
> > I'd prefer to defer to the Security Team on this one, as to whether
> > they'd generally accept it in packages they were releasing.
>
> Lintian complained that
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 13:09:00 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> + * Remove symbol that was intended to be private (Closes: #782678).
This description of that change is terrible. The symbol is actually
removed by 22-disable-1565.patch, this is removing it from the debian
packaging metadata, not th
Am 19.06.2015 um 00:26 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: jessie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Dear release team,
>
> In Sid, I added missing systemd .service files to the cloud-init package,
> because without them,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
In Sid, I added missing systemd .service files to the cloud-init package,
because without them, the ordering when starting cloud-init is completely
wrong. With th
Hello!
2015-06-15 21:49 GMT+03:00 Adam D. Barratt :
> On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:55 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> [...]
>> 2015-06-14 1:37 GMT+03:00 Adam D. Barratt :
>> > On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 01:09 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
>> >> I hereby request permission to upload some critical and minor
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded.
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 11:44 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I would like to update python-reportlab in jessie as it suffers from a
> regression compared to wheezy in the way it handles PNG with transparency
> (see #785023 for details). Working code now throws exception
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #787806 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
python-reportlab/3.1.8-3+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
787806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problem
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #789189 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package lynx-cur/2.8.9dev1-2+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
789189: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 20:37 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> I would like to fix 784430 in jessie:
>
> * lynx-cur is using a buggy GnuTLS priority string.
> * After fixing GNUTLS-SA-2015-2 (a minor issue) GnuTLS is more strict
> when applying the priority string. Com
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #785780 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package python-keystonemiddleware
1.0.0-3 -> 1.0.0-3+deb8u1 and python-keystoneclient 0.10.1-2 -> 0.10.1-2+deb8u1
(CVE-2015-1852)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
Bug #785780 [release.debian.org] jess
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 10:50 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I almost completely forgot about this issue.
>
> I have uploaded a fix today in Sid and in Jessie backports. Can we get
> the fix reach Jessie proposed updates as well?
I'm really not
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
I would like to fix 784430 in jessie:
* lynx-cur is using a buggy GnuTLS priority string.
* After fixing GNUTLS-SA-2015-2 (a minor issue) GnuTLS is more strict
when applyi
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #782381 [release.debian.org] pu: package motif/2.3.4-8
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
782381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Removing moreinfo tag since it was set before release and there is a new
patch sent for pu.
On Tue, 26 May 2015 13:09:00 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi SRMs
>
> Please find debdiff against motif 2.3.4-6 attached.
> This is the same as version 2.3.4-8 that has been i
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 09:50:44AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Attached is the list of packages appearing in the tracker, with an
> annotation:
> - "unstable" if the package can be binNMUed
> - "experimental" if the package has to be uploaded from experimental
> - "UNRELEASED" if the package
On Thursday 18 June 2015 14:59:39 Matthias Klose wrote:
[snip]
> I would prefer b), and preparing the packages to build with the gcc-5 from
> experimental (not unstable).
OK.
> Does Qt 5.4.2 change sonames? If not, please
> prepare to change the library package names, if new cxx11 symbols are
>
On 06/17/2015 09:42 PM, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2015 23:37:41 Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's time to prepare for GCC 5 as the default compiler in unstable.
>> Compared to earlier version bumps, the switch to GCC 5 is a bit more
>> complicated becaus
On Do 18 Jun 2015 12:36:36 CEST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2015-06-18 09:38, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Jonathan, hi Michael,
On Mo 15 Jun 2015 23:36:02 CEST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On 2015-06-15 21:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 15.06.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Micha
On 2015-06-18 09:38, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Jonathan, hi Michael,
On Mo 15 Jun 2015 23:36:02 CEST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On 2015-06-15 21:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 15.06.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User:
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:06:05 +0200
with message-id <558289fd.2080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#789135: nmu (for experimental):
marco_1.10.1+dfsg1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #789135,
regarding nmu (for experimental): marco_1.10.1+dfsg1-1~exp1
to be marked as
On 18/06/15 10:38, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Jonathan, hi Michael,
>
> On Mo 15 Jun 2015 23:36:02 CEST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>
>> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 2015-06-15 21:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Am 15.06.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Package: release.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.2.html
Bug #789077 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby2.2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.2.html'.
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #789077 [release.debian.o
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
marco in experimental is also affected by the auto-libgtop2 transition
and requires to be rebuilt.
nmu marco_1.10.1+dfsg1-1~exp1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with libgtop-2.0-10."
Thanks,
Mike
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby2.2.html
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 17/06/15 20:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 05:59:28PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>> On 2015-06-17 17:26, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 1
Hi Jonathan, hi Michael,
On Mo 15 Jun 2015 23:36:02 CEST, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On 2015-06-15 21:37, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 15.06.2015 um 22:28 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Use
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Managers and OCaml Maintainers,
I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.02.2 (released
yesterday) as soon as possible. This version has been preceded by a
release ca
29 matches
Mail list logo
