Bug#784160: transition: proj

2015-05-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/08/2015 11:26 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > The current blockers are the cdo/ppc64el build failure (#763691) and the > pdl/i386 one. Both cdo & pdl are good now too, and so is xastir. For some reason postgis is still marked as bad on mips, but I don't understand why. The mips build fo

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-05-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: cwm_5.5-1+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mew_6.6-2+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mew-beta_7.0.50~6.6+0.20140902-1+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subjec

Bug#784946: jessie-pu: package feed2imap/1.2.3-1+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This fixes 2 regressions with regard to the wheezy version. Both changes are already in unstable as part of new upstream releases. debdiff is attached. -- System Information: Debia

Bug#784944: jessie-pu: package redmine/3.0~20140825-7~deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This release fixes several bugs related to upgrades from wheezy. The equivalent version is already in testing. I have tested it extensively, and received positive feedback from multi

Bug#784943: jessie-pu: package ruby-defaults/1:2.1.5+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This adds a Conflicts: against ruby-activesupport-2.3 to help with upgrade paths from wheezy; a similar change was made before the release for ruby-activesupport-3.2. debdiff is att

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-05-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: cwm_5.5-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cwm_5.5-1+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cwm_5.5-1+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cwm_5.5-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cwm_5.5-1+deb8

Bug#784160: transition: proj

2015-05-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/10/2015 09:23 PM, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > On 10/05/2015 17:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 09/05/15 17:58, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> On 05/08/2015 11:26 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: The current blockers are the cdo/

Bug#784160: transition: proj

2015-05-10 Thread Alastair McKinstry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/05/2015 17:15, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/05/15 17:58, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 05/08/2015 11:26 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> The current blockers are the cdo/ppc64el build failure (#763691) and the >>> pdl/i386

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2015-05-10 20:02, Mike Miller wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:57:36 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Are the updated packages tested against the libopenconnect5 in experimental? Do they need to happen in sync with libopenconnect5 or can they be done in advance? I expect both rdeps can b

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Mike Miller
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:57:36 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Are the updated packages tested against the libopenconnect5 in > experimental? Do they need to happen in sync with libopenconnect5 or can > they be done in advance? I expect both rdeps can be updated with or without libopenconnect

Bug#784160: transition: proj

2015-05-10 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/10/2015 06:15 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/05/15 17:58, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 05/08/2015 11:26 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> The current blockers are the cdo/ppc64el build failure (#763691) and the >>> pdl/i386 one. >> >> pdl/i386 has been fixed, an NMU for c

Processed: block 784924 with 784921, block 784924 with 784922

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 784924 with 784921 Bug #784924 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect 784924 was not blocked by any bugs. 784924 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 784924: 784921 > block 784924 with 784922 Bug #784924 [release.debian.

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: block -1 784921 Control: block -1 784922 Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openconnect.html On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 01:46:10PM -0400, Mike Miller wrote: > Please create a transition slot for the new libopenconnect5 library > p

Bug#784801: jessie-pu: package cproto/4.7l-4

2015-05-10 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 12:53 -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: >> > If you were referring to whether to take the backport route or adding >> > the patch, then either is fine as long as the version number makes sense >> > for the approach taken. >> >> I've attached a patch for 4.7l-3+deb8u1, which I

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #784924 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect Added tag(s) moreinfo. > block -1 784921 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > block -1 784922 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > forwarded -1 https://release.

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Mike Miller
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, Please create a transition slot for the new libopenconnect5 library package. The current upstream version 7.06 providing this library is already packaged and available

NEW changes in stable-new

2015-05-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: cwm_5.5-1+deb8u1_all.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mew_6.6-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mew-beta_7.0.50~6.6+0.20140902-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: semi_1.14.7~0.20120428-14+deb8u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Pr

Processed: Re: Bug#784816: jessie-pu: package mew-beta/7.0.50~6.6+0.20140902-1+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #784816 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mew-beta/7.0.50~6.6+0.20140902-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 784816: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784816 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro

Processed: Re: Bug#784714: jessie-pu: package semi/1.14.7~0.20120428-14+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #784714 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package semi/1.14.7~0.20120428-14+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 784714: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784714 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#784816: jessie-pu: package mew-beta/7.0.50~6.6+0.20140902-1+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 15:23 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > On May 9, 2015 at 8:20PM +0100, adam (at adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > Please go ahead. > > Uploaded. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#784714: jessie-pu: package semi/1.14.7~0.20120428-14+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 15:23 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > On May 9, 2015 at 8:22PM +0100, adam (at adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote: > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed > > Thanks; please go ahead. > > Uploaded. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSU

Bug#784815: jessie-pu: package mew/1:6.6-2+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 15:23 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > On May 9, 2015 at 8:20PM +0100, adam (at adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > Please go ahead. > > Uploaded. Flagged for acceptance. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: Re: Bug#784815: jessie-pu: package mew/1:6.6-2+deb8u1

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #784815 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mew/1:6.6-2+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 784815: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784815 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCR

Processed: Re: Bug#783884: jessie-pu: package cwm/5.5-1

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #783884 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package cwm/5.5-1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 783884: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Bug#783884: jessie-pu: package cwm/5.5-1

2015-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 20:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 23:15 +0200, James McDonald wrote: > > This is a backport of a patch to fix lookups on XFS and other > > filesystems which don't populate d_type in struct

Processed: Re: Bug#784915: jessie-pu: package rsnapshot/1.3.1-4

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #784915 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package rsnapshot/1.3.1-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 784915: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784915 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSC

Bug#784915: jessie-pu: package rsnapshot/1.3.1-4

2015-05-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 17:52 +0200, Guillaume Delacour wrote: > I've introduced [1] in rsnapshot version 1.3.1-4 a problem which affects > multiple user: when defining custom ssh_args they're not properly > interpreted (erroneously quoted). [...] > [1]: https://bugs.deb

Bug#784160: transition: proj

2015-05-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/05/15 17:58, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 05/08/2015 11:26 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> The current blockers are the cdo/ppc64el build failure (#763691) and the >> pdl/i386 one. > > pdl/i386 has been fixed, an NMU for cdo is available but not uploaded yet. Please upload your cd

Bug#761128: transition: oce

2015-05-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/05/15 21:26, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:45:48PM +0200, D. Barbier wrote: >> I would like to upload oce 0.16 into unstable, it is currently in >> experimental. This source package provides several development >> libraries, their soname version have been bum

Bug#784915: jessie-pu: package rsnapshot/1.3.1-4

2015-05-10 Thread Guillaume Delacour
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I've introduced [1] in rsnapshot version 1.3.1-4 a problem which affects multiple user: when defining custom ssh_args they're no

Bug#784905: jessie-pu: (preapproval) package qcontrol/0.5.4-1

2015-05-10 Thread Ian Campbell
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I'd like to fix #781886 "qcontrol failure to start on boot sometimes (jessie, systemd?)" in Jessie. The issue is that when running in LSB compat mode the devices may not have been c