also sprach Adam D. Barratt [2015-01-17 00:20 +0100]:
> It is a new upstream version. Jessie has 1.8.10, sid has 1.8.11.
> (The diff is also significant, even after stripping obvious
> noise.)
Ah, sorry. I had somehow overlooked that.
Christian, I suppose it'll have to be 1.8.10p3-1.1 via t-p-u.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package macchanger
This reverts a change in the default behaviour from wheezy (#768189)
and fixes a possible failure mode in randomisation (#775005), both
of which bugs are R
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:51:31 +
with message-id <20150116235131.gn29...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775206: unblock (pre-approval): argonaut/0.9.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #775206,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): argonaut/0.9.1-4
to be marke
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:44:47 +
with message-id <20150116234447.gm29...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775411: unblock: gl2ps/1.3.8-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #775411,
regarding unblock: gl2ps/1.3.8-1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:15:29PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Wait. Got it: DPKG won't squash a previous directory.
>
> Fixed in maintainer script. Patch attached.
>
> Release Team:
>
> Is this something worth getting a freeze exception for? If yes, should
> it be introduced via unstable
On 2015-01-14 21:40, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Ivo De Decker [2015-01-14 21:58 +0100]:
I'm reluctant to allow this, as this essentially means dumping this
new
version into jessie untested. I would prefer if it was just uploaded
to
unstable (reverting the new upstream version there), t
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:13:29 +
with message-id <20150116231329.gk29...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775184: unblock: gtkpod/2.1.4-5 (pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #775184,
regarding unblock: gtkpod/2.1.4-5 (pre-approval)
to be marked as
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:10:25 +
with message-id <20150116231025.gj29...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775347: unblock (pre-approval):
fusiondirectory/1.0.8.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #775347,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): fusiondirectory/1.
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:05:28 +
with message-id <20150116230528.gi29...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775256: unblock (pre-approval):
mate-session-manager/1.8.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #775256,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): mate-session-ma
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #775380 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package ikiwiki/3.20120629.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
775380: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UN
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2015-01-14 22:44, Simon McVittie wrote:
Here is the pu request corresponding to #774835, backporting support
for
the new blogspam.net API to ikiwiki. This makes ikiwiki/stable able to
filter spammy comments again.
+ Backport blogspam plugin from experimental,
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:57:32 +
with message-id <16572f29b3fffdcd45e5993a8dfaa...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#774968: unblock: ocl-icd/2.2.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #774968,
regarding unblock: ocl-icd/2.2.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means t
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2015-01-16 16:07, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Please unblock package uncrustify
I've removed the non-free file from the tarball. See #753760.
The package was removed from testing at the start of August and nothing
happened for over five months. I'm not convinced w
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #775516 [release.debian.org] unblock: uncrustify/0.59+dfsg1-1.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
775516: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775516
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:39:03 +
with message-id <20150116223903.gh29...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775533: unblock: wireless-regdb/2014.11.18-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #775533,
regarding unblock: wireless-regdb/2014.11.18-1
to be marked as don
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Please unblock package tbb
>
> It fixes two grave bugs: #756233 & #762656
> It also fixes a longer term issue, as depicted in comment: #775263#17
> So I understand the debdiff may be a little long, but u
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #775506 [release.debian.org] unblock: tbb/4.2~20140122-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
775506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775506
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package wireless-regdb
I have again updated wireless-regdb in unstable to a new upstream
release. There have been several changes to the database based on new
regulations an
Processing changes file: rpm_4.10.0-5+deb7u2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rpm_4.10.0-5+deb7u2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rpm_4.10.0-5+deb7u2_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rpm_4.10.0-5+deb7u2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: rpm
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:45:47 +
with message-id <20150116214547.gf29...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775407: unblock: pmacct/1.5.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #775407,
regarding unblock: pmacct/1.5.0-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:06:00 +0100
with message-id <54b97d38.7020...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775039: pre-approval: apt/1.0.9.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #775039,
regarding pre-approval: apt/1.0.9.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On 2015-01-16 12:03, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi together,
>
> Andreas Tille wrote:
>> [...]
>> I'm seriously wondering whether this issue is RC critical for Jessie
>> release
>
> To be honest: I think this is generally an RC-level issue and should
> be fixed.
>
> [...]
TL;DR - it seems like this
2015-01-16 13:38 Andreas Tille:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
One more thing I'm still curious about: How the fuck do you stumble
upon such a bug? :-) I don't expect that Andreas runs piuparts
starting with Lenny on a daily business or without reason. I expect
th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package condor
After you positive feedback I want to upload a package update that
fixes:
https://bugs.debian.org/775276
I am attaching the debdiffs for source and binary pa
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package uncrustify
I've removed the non-free file from the tarball. See #753760.
unblock uncrustify/0.59+dfsg1-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers
On 15-01-16 14:21:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 14:12 +0100, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> > On 15-01-16 01:10:32, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> [...]
> > > You've most likely been bitten by http://bugs.debian.org/774436 I'm
> > > afraid - a kernel bug that crept into the 7.8 release. Fi
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 14:12 +0100, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On 15-01-16 01:10:32, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[...]
> > You've most likely been bitten by http://bugs.debian.org/774436 I'm
> > afraid - a kernel bug that crept into the 7.8 release. Fixed packages
> > are already available for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tbb
It fixes two grave bugs: #756233 & #762656
It also fixes a longer term issue, as depicted in comment: #775263#17
So I understand the debdiff may be a little long,
Wait. Got it: DPKG won't squash a previous directory.
Fixed in maintainer script. Patch attached.
Release Team:
Is this something worth getting a freeze exception for? If yes, should
it be introduced via unstable, jessies-update, or something else?
Cheers!
Martin-Éric
2015-01-16 14:48 GMT+02:0
Hi Axel,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Well, you (Andreas T) did not cite a possible relevant part here:
>
> | This was observed on the following upgrade paths:
> |
> | lenny -> squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie
Yes, I was a bit short.
> > I'm seriously wondering
Steve,
On 15-01-16 01:10:32, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 01:43:55AM +0100, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> >I'm not really sure if my assumptions are true, because checking the
> >updated package lists in the recently announced didn't reveal any gnome
> >packages.
> >
> >However, a f
On 12/30/2014 01:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 12/30/2014 01:27 PM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
>> On 2014-12-30 14:05, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> - several fixes for CVE issues, the security team asked to include these
>>> into jessie.
>>> - CVE-2014-8484 (PR binutils/17509).
>>>
Hi together,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I stumbled upon this bug since it affects staden maintained by
> Debian Med.
Same here with gnudatalanguage.
> When reading the bug report I stumbled upon
>
>The errors seems to date back to the lenny->squeeze update ...
Well, you (Andreas T) did not cit
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking of planned upload of package mate-system-tools
The MATE packaging team received a patch for mate-system-tools from
Ubuntu developer Logan Rose, that should make i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package axe
* build the non-free package on i386, too, like it was in wheezy
* readd a dummy empty prerm to ensure we can upgrade from wheezy (the
package th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking of planned upload of package slbackup
This upload fixes a package purgal issue detected by piuparts (#706108).
* debian/slbackup.dirs:
+ Make /var/lib/slb
Processing changes file: clamav_0.98.5+dfsg-0+deb7u3_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1yc3gb-0003t1...@franck.debian
37 matches
Mail list logo
