On 30/07/14 20:09, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find an updated status below.
>
> I've filed a few more bugs for fixes to build systems which don't need
> any hint about the new hdf5 paths.
>
> I've uploaded a fix for #756108 to DELAYED/2.
>
> I've added a usertag "HDF5-transition"
Hi,
Please find an updated status below.
I've filed a few more bugs for fixes to build systems which don't need
any hint about the new hdf5 paths.
I've uploaded a fix for #756108 to DELAYED/2.
I've added a usertag "HDF5-transition" [1] to the bugs related to this
transition, but not for bugs re
Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2014, 16:10 +0200 schrieb Roland Mas:
> Daniel Beyer, 2014-07-30 15:23:00 +0200 :
> >
> > (...)
> >
> > in the meantime upstream released Twig 1.16.0 and I'm currently updating
> > the twig packaging. Instead of doing a nmu, may I asked you to upload
> > the new upstream rel
Daniel Beyer, 2014-07-30 15:23:00 +0200 :
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2014, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Roland Mas:
>> nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for phpapi-20131226"
>>
>> The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed NEW; in the
>> meantime, PHP was upgraded in Debian, with a differen
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:05:26 +0200
with message-id <20140730140526.gd3...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#756508: nmu: twig_1.15.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #756508,
regarding nmu: twig_1.15.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 14:57:02 +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for phpapi-20131226"
>
> The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed
Am Mittwoch, den 30.07.2014, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Roland Mas:
> nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for phpapi-20131226"
>
> The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed NEW; in the
> meantime, PHP was upgraded in Debian, with a different API. Hence,
> one of the binary packages can't
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu twig_1.15.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for phpapi-20131226"
The twig package was prepared in April, and just passed NEW; in the
meantime, PHP was upgraded in Debian, with a different API. He
Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:10:39 +0200
with message-id <53d8c49f.3050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#755094: transition: harfbuzz
has caused the Debian Bug report #755094,
regarding transition: harfbuzz
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:09:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> You can upload it directly to unstable (e.g. 0.9.32-1 with
> HB_VERSION_CHECK/hb_version_check added back) with the old package name
> (libharfbuzz0b). Then the packages in experimental with the renamed package
> will
> be r
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
we are packaging the 3.2.1 stable release of openscenegraph, which is
API-compatible with the current version in Debian, so only binNMUs
should be needed.
Reverse dep
Le 27/07/2014 13:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 26/07/14 22:31, Eric Maeker wrote:
>> Le 26/07/2014 15:36, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> On 26/07/14 11:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> So I suggest you do the following:
>>>
>>> 1: Rename libquazip1-dev to libquazip-dev.
>>
>>
On 29/07/14 20:37, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 15:24:58 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
>
>> My question, should I add HB_VERSION_CHECK as it was before 0.9.30 ?
>> Or should I add it as an alias for HB_VERSION_ATLEAST ?
>>
> Bring it back with the old implementation, I would
13 matches
Mail list logo
