On 29/07/14 20:37, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 15:24:58 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote: > >> My question, should I add HB_VERSION_CHECK as it was before 0.9.30 ? >> Or should I add it as an alias for HB_VERSION_ATLEAST ? >> > Bring it back with the old implementation, I would say.
Yes. You can upload it directly to unstable (e.g. 0.9.32-1 with HB_VERSION_CHECK/hb_version_check added back) with the old package name (libharfbuzz0b). Then the packages in experimental with the renamed package will be removed. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53d89a2b.8000...@debian.org
