Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
proftpd-mod-geoip contains a broken postrm script that deletes a file
on upgrades after the new package has been unpacked. #726742
This can be triggered by either upgrades from whee
Processing changes file:
libglib-object-introspection-perl_0.009-1+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w7ddt-0002os...@f
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-7+wheezy1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w7dpn-hq...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file:
libglib-object-introspection-perl_0.009-1+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w7daq-0005v1...@
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-7+wheezy1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1w7cwl-00037b...@franck.debian.or
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-7+wheezy1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
libglib-object-introspection-perl_0.009-1+deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-7+wheezy1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-7+wheezy1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-7+wheezy1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-rpaf_
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
> need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps or is that handled by
> the release team?
>
Drop me / this bug a line once protobuf is built on all archs i
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:02:53 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
>
> > Please let me know when I may begin this transition by uploading to
> > unstable.
> >
> If you're confident binNMUs of the reverse deps will be enough (ie there
> were no API
Control: tag 724722 moreinfo
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 02:21:42 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> reassign 724598 libmemcache
> notforwarded 724598
> thanks
>
> Ok, after reading related bugs
> https://github.com/php-memcached-dev/php-memcached/pull/80
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/libmemcached/+b
Processing control commands:
> tag 724722 moreinfo
Bug #724722 [release.debian.org] transition: libmemcached
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
724722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #726165 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
726165: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:02:53 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Please let me know when I may begin this transition by uploading to
> unstable.
>
If you're confident binNMUs of the reverse deps will be enough (ie there
were no API changes) then go ahead.
Cheers,
Julien
Processing control commands:
> block 728919 with -1
Bug #728919 [release.debian.org] transition: freebsd-libs
728919 was blocked by: 736599 736608
728919 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 728919: 736660
--
728919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728919
736660:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 734184 1.5.7~rc1~cvs.20130519-1
Bug #734184 {Done: Thorsten Alteholz } [mgltools-pmv]
Problem starting autodocktools
Marked as found in versions mgltools-pmv/1.5.7~rc1~cvs.20130519-1.
> tags 736145 + moreinfo
Bug #736145 [nvidia-detect] nvi
Hi,
I now have protobuf 2.5.0 building on all architectures in experimental.
(Upstream did some... interesting... things to cause FTBFSes on all but
a few "supported" architectures.)
Please let me know when I may begin this transition by uploading to
unstable.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo..
Hi stable release managers,
On Samstag, 18. Januar 2014, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > This file is not included into binary package, so we can simply remove
> > it from original tarball.
> Yes
>
> > Should this bug be fixed for wheezy?
> See stable release team
is it ok to tag all these bugs ("s
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: block -1 with 735549
In addition to updating nvidia-graphics-drivers to a new upstream
(#735549) we need to update the prebuilt kernel modules.
I'm attaching a proposed sou
Processing control commands:
> block -1 with 735549
Bug #736654 [release.debian.org] pu: package
nvidia-graphics-modules/304.117+3.2.0+1
736654 was not blocked by any bugs.
736654 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 736654: 735549
--
736654: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
close 732762 1.10.1-1
thanks
On 2013-10-22 14:04, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu libgdal-grass_1.9.0-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against grass 6.4.3"
> dw libgdal-grass_1.9.0-1 . ia64 . -m "grass-dev (>= 6.4.3)"
There was a maintainer upload of a new upstream release: 1.10.1-1 that
has been built succes
2014/1/23 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo :
> 2014/1/22 Rebecca N. Palmer :
>> choreonoid and ossim turned out to also FTBFS (for
>> non-openscenegraph-related reasons); I have posted a patch for choreonoid
>> (#735891), and suggested that ossim (#735814) move to the already-fixed
>> version in the
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jan 2014 20:09:47 +0100
with message-id <201401252009.47885.a...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: nmu: gpac_0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #730118,
regarding nmu: gpac_0.5.0+svn4288~dfsg1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 731861 + pending
Bug #731861 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnc
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
731861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731861
Deb
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #731861 {Done: Andreas Beckmann } [release.debian.org]
transition: miniupnc
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #731861 to the same values
previously set
--
731861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731861
Deb
Control: reopen -1
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:15:17 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Except for transmission which FTBFS on non-qt5 architectures (#733090)
> miniupnc rdepends have been rebuilt in sid.
>
sid != testing. Reopening...
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing changes file: denyhosts_2.6-10+deb7u3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-rpaf_0.6-7+wheezy1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
libglib-object-introspection-perl_0.009-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-r
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 11:53 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:24:40PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 03:13 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> > > This version fixes important regression in wheezy (#726529) for
> > > ip
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #736467 [release.debian.org] pu: libapache2-mod-rpaf/0.6-7+wheezy1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
736467: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736467
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 15:12 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote (22 Jan 2014 21:35:55 GMT) :
> > Please go ahead; thanks.
>
> Uploaded.
Flagged for acceptance; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #736257 [release.debian.org] pu: package
libglib-object-introspection-perl/0.009-1+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
736257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736257
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with p
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:27:34 +0100
with message-id <201401251627.34346.a...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#731902: nmu: transmission_2.82-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731902,
regarding nmu: transmission_2.82-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:15:17 +0100
with message-id <52e3d505.2030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#731861: transition: miniupnc
has caused the Debian Bug report #731861,
regarding transition: miniupnc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing control commands:
> block 728919 with -1
Bug #728919 [release.debian.org] transition: freebsd-libs
728919 was blocked by: 736599
728919 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 728919: 736608
--
728919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728919
736608: http://
On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 13:31 +, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 25.01.2014, 10:59 -0200 schrieb Megaf:
> > Hi all. I was wondering why there's no Flightgear for Wheezy, then I
> > found out this.
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg01284.html
> >
> >
> > The thing
Dear Megaf,
Am Samstag, den 25.01.2014, 10:59 -0200 schrieb Megaf:
> Hi all. I was wondering why there's no Flightgear for Wheezy, then I
> found out this.
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg01284.html
>
>
> The thing is, all those bugs are all fixed now.
>
>
> Bellow a short
Hi all. I was wondering why there's no Flightgear for Wheezy, then I found
out this.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg01284.html
The thing is, all those bugs are all fixed now.
Bellow a short chat I had at Flightgear official channel at
irc.flightgear.org
* Now talking on #flig
Le vendredi 24 janvier 2014 à 19:33 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 15:02 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > please accept the new version of librsvg to fix a regression in the
> > previous security upload.
> >
> > librsvg (2.26.3-1+deb6u2) oldstable; urgency=low
> >
>
Processing control commands:
> block 728919 with -1
Bug #728919 [release.debian.org] transition: freebsd-libs
728919 was not blocked by any bugs.
728919 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 728919: 736599
--
728919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728919
736599: h
Le Tue, 21 Jan 2014 10:29:44 +0100,
Laurent Bigonville a écrit :
Hi,
> Le Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:33:14 +0100,
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 03:06:03 +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> >
> > > Le Sun, 5 Jan 2014 01:54:07 +0100,
> > > L
39 matches
Mail list logo
