Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ugq2p-0002tf...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ugpkr-0006mh...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ugl7a-0001cf...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #709942 [release.debian.org] RM: gir1.2-libgsf-1
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #709942 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 08:33 +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Please remove package "gir1.2-libgsf-1" from testing.
We can't. Partly because only source packages get removed from testing,
not single binary packages, and partly because the package you named
doesn't
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archiv
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ugjxd-if...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove package "gir1.2-libgsf-1" from testing.
As per #695599 this package was renamed in unstable:
"gir1.2-libgsf-1" --> "gir1.2-gsf-1"
but libgsf can't migrate to testing because o
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_sparc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Your message dated Sun, 26 May 2013 23:20:37 +0100
with message-id <1369606837.18864.90.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#708694: transition: libqscintilla2-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #708694,
regarding transition: libqscintilla2-9
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 26 May 2013 23:19:15 +0100
with message-id <1369606755.18864.89.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#707239: transition: sip4
has caused the Debian Bug report #707239,
regarding transition: sip4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1
Hi Adam (2013.05.26_17:04:45_+0200)
> Okay. Sorry it took a while to get back to you; a combination of the
> flood after the release and an attempt to have a brief relax before
> diving back in to things.
Totally understandable :)
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 461
Hello!
I've just uploaded gnome-control-center 1:3.4.3.1-3 to unstable
fixing the previous FTBFS with libgoa-1.0-dev 3.8.x.
The new package has also been build-tested with libgnomekbd8.
Hopefully this eliminates all and any doubts that libgnomekbd8 can
be a quick and easy transition.
--
Andrea
On 26/05/13 18:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Status update:
On 20/05/13 21:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I'd like to request a slot for the cogl transition. We will upload cogl and
clutter-1.0 from experimental to unstable. I have rebuilt all of libcogl9
reverse dependencies and all but
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 20:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On dim., 2013-05-26 at 17:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 17:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > In the meanwhile, would it be possible to remove both packages
> > > (squeeze/0.2.3-12 and thunar-vfs/1.2.0-
On dim., 2013-05-26 at 17:40 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 17:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > In the meanwhile, would it be possible to remove both packages
> > (squeeze/0.2.3-12 and thunar-vfs/1.2.0-3) from testing?
>
> Unfortunately
Status update:
On 20/05/13 21:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I'd like to request a slot for the cogl transition. We will upload cogl and
clutter-1.0 from experimental to unstable. I have rebuilt all of libcogl9
reverse dependencies and all but these build fine:
clutter-gst failed
clutter-gtk
On 2013-05-26 13:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 00:52 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Attaching the diff.
>> I like the +build0 suggestion :-)
>
> Please go ahead; thanks.
uploaded to DELAYED/2, but I can change this if you want
> How easy
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #709898 [release.debian.org] RM: squeeze/0.2.3-12 thunar-vfs/1.2.0-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
709898: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709898
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 17:02 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> In the meanwhile, would it be possible to remove both packages
> (squeeze/0.2.3-12 and thunar-vfs/1.2.0-3) from testing?
Unfortunately we can't do that right now:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken D
Processing changes file: ruby-tmail_1.2.7.1-3+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: octave_3.6.2-5+deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nbd_3.2-4~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: distro-info-data_0.16~deb7u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UN
Adam D. Barratt:
> Control: tags -1 + pending
>
> On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 12:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Please go ahead with the upload, bearing in mind Cyril's earlier
> > comments regarding versioning.
>
> The package was uploaded and I've just flagged it for acceptance.
Thanks a lot!
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 20:09 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 07-05-13 17:59, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > What are my chances of that happening? Also, should I upload again, or
> > can the version that's currently in unstable be moved/copied to
> > stable(-proposed-updates) without problem?
>
> As far
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #708223 [release.debian.org] pu: package ruby-tmail/1.2.7.1-3deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
708223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSC
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 12:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead with the upload, bearing in mind Cyril's earlier
> comments regarding versioning.
The package was uploaded and I've just flagged it for acceptance.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #707284 [release.debian.org] pu: octave/3.6.2-5+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
707284: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707284
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 12:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 08:15 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > I confirm that the proposed patched is included in octave version
> > 3.6.4-2 currently in sid.
>
> Please go ahead; thanks.
The package was upl
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 14:33 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Adam (2013.05.26_12:38:52_+0200)
> > Hmmm. Data-only packages certainly make sense for stable-updates, it's
> > just a question of whether they all do.
>
> Fair enough. Given that the first point release is a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #707752 [release.debian.org] pu: package distro-info-data/0.16~wheezy1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
707752: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
as thunar-vfs is obsolete, we'd like to remove it from Jessie. We can't
remove it from unstable just yet since Squeeze still depends on it.
Unt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 704227 + confirmed
Bug #704227 [release.debian.org] pu: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-11~deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
704227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Hi Adam (2013.05.26_12:38:52_+0200)
> I assume unstable was only an example of a codename here, as the diff
> doesn't look like it would affect parsing of "unstable" (unless I'm
> missing something).
Yeah, testing, stable, and oldstable would be the ones that matter :)
> Hmmm. Data-only packages
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ugzee-0005ux...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706380 [release.debian.org] pu: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build0
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706380: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706380
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 00:52 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Attaching the diff.
> I like the +build0 suggestion :-)
Please go ahead; thanks.
How easy / difficult would it be to set up some upgrade tests involving
this / similar packages once they're in p-u?
Regards
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #706329 [release.debian.org] pu: atlas/3.8.4-9+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
706329: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706329
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 00:34 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> This should be a really save Breaks being added
Famous last words...
> - the package in
> question is going to be removed anyway during the upgrade, we must only
> ensure it happens early enough.
Please go
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Bug #707284 [release.debian.org] pu: octave/3.6.2-5+deb7u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #707284 to the same tags previously set
Bug #707284 [release.debian.org] pu: octave/3.6.2-5+deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
707284: http:
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 08:15 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 01:03 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
>
> > Sébastien Villemot (08/05/2013):
> > > The patch fixes the rcond function, which computes (the inverse of)
> > > the conditi
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 22:51 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Please find attached a proposed update for LAPACK. It fixes an issue with
> wrong
> numerical results in a multithreaded environment, so I consider this severe
> enough to warrant a stable update.
Please
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #707167 [release.debian.org] pu: package lapack/3.4.1+dfsg-1+deb70u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
707167: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707167
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UN
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 14:54 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> I'd like to upload net-snmp package due to fix piuparts
> failure with upgrade to newer version. Please check attached
> debdiff (as I mistake, it contains unnecessary .ex file but
> not remove it, just as is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #708223 [release.debian.org] pu: package ruby-tmail/1.2.7.1-3deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
708223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNS
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:32 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois:
[...]
> > this package seems to have ruby-actionmailer-2.3 has a r-dep. Should
> > we anticipate side effects in there due to this bug fix? If so, only
> > positive ones, surely? :)
>
> ruby-ac
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #706799 [release.debian.org] pu: net-snmp/5.4.3-3+wheezy1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
706799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #704566 [release.debian.org] pu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
704566: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704566
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBS
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2013-05-12 at 12:58 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On 13.04.2013 17:28, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> I'd rather avoid taking chances at this very late stage. Before rc2
> >> would have been doable, but
Control: tags - 1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:19 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> > "Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> >> The version needs to be lower than that in testing, so either -10+deb7u1
> >> or -11~deb7u1.
>
> I think we'll go with the latter; that should be more descriptive as it
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 11:39 +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 23:27, David Prévot wrote:
> > Javier, given your last edition dates from over two weeks, and a point
> > release is scheduled in three weeks, is it OK for you to get the
> > remaining (main) translations updated,
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 00:06 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 22 May 2013 22:40:57 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > > > > I'd like to upload libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.58-1+2013c to s-p-u
> > > > ACK, targeting wheezy in changelog, of course.
[...]
> > > > > (and also have it moved
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 00:24 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Adam (2013.05.22_23:21:49_+0200)
> > What's the real-world impact of the dates being wrong in wheezy for
> > another few weeks? (i.e. the rationale for stable-updates rather than
> > just waiting for 7.1 to be released.)
>
> Mostly just
On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 00:49 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> I looked (quickly must confess) at a way of testing the fix and see if
> there was a regression or not. The problem is that the patch is in the
> server part of the code, and I think that actually nothing is using it
> (and I'm not sure
Processing changes file: wdm_1.28-13+deb7u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ugy0g-00074f...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Sun, 26 May 2013 10:39:02 +0100
with message-id <1369561142.18864.46.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#709802: RM: libapache-mod-random/2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #709802,
regarding RM: libapache-mod-random/2.1-1
to be marked as done.
Thi
On 22 May 2013 23:27, David Prévot wrote:
> Javier, given your last edition dates from over two weeks, and a point
> release is scheduled in three weeks, is it OK for you to get the
> remaining (main) translations updated, and to pursue the initial goal?
> In case you don’t have time to finish it,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 709865 + pending
Bug #709865 [release.debian.org] transition: libosip2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
709865: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709865
Deb
61 matches
Mail list logo
