On 2013-02-18 08:23, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> Niels Thykier:
>>> - Updating to openjdk-7 in wheezy would not solve any issues from my
>>>point of view, and it would need some porting of packages to 7, and
>>>probably removing some packages which are not yet ported.
>>>Otoh removing op
Niels Thykier:
>> - Updating to openjdk-7 in wheezy would not solve any issues from my
>>point of view, and it would need some porting of packages to 7, and
>>probably removing some packages which are not yet ported.
>>Otoh removing openjdk-7 for wheezy could be an option if only one
>
Processing changes file: fusionforge_5.0.2-5+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7kjn-sl...@franck.debian.org
Your message dated Mon, 18 Feb 2013 07:46:36 +0100
with message-id <5121ce4c.4040...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#700163: pu: package openssh/1:5.5p1-6+squeeze3
has caused the Debian Bug report #700167,
regarding unblock openssh/1:6.0p1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing control commands:
> tags 700675 + pending
Bug #700675 [release.debian.org] pu: package fusionforge/5.0.2-5+squeeze1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #700675 to the same tags previously set
--
700675: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700675
Debian Bug Tracking Syst
Control: tags 700675 + pending
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 19:45 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 20:25 +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> > Andreas Beckmann, 2013-02-16 12:03:01 +0100 :
> > > The fusionforge packages are not really in a good shape for automated
> > > testing (e.g. #678025,
Processing control commands:
> tags 700675 + pending
Bug #700675 [release.debian.org] pu: package fusionforge/5.0.2-5+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
696369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696369
700675: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700675
Debian Bug Track
Thanks a lot for explaining the situation and alternative paths forward.
My view as a user:
I only want OpenJDK7 (maybe OpenJDK8 when that becomes generally
available on September 9, 2013 :-)
Oracle has announced that no more new public updates of Java SE 6 will
be made available after February
Hi!
Matthias Klose writes:
> - Afaik openjdk-7 for kfreebsd does build on kfreebsd (according to Damien)
>with the kfreebsd kernel from wheezy. So maybe some commitment could be
>found to upgrade and maintain the kernels before wheezy is released?
Actually as far as I could narrow it
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze2_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7ia5-0002wr...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7hh3-0003iu...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze2_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7ebi-0005dv...@franck.debian.org
Now that d-i rc1 is out, it's time to update the kernel in unstable.
There are a huge number of pending fixes from 3.2.y (including security
issues and the Samsung laptop brick bug), lots of new hardware support
(particularly the DRM update), and udeb updates for armhf and for HID
drivers. The cu
Am 18.02.2013 00:08, schrieb Niels Thykier:
> On 2013-02-17 23:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> - Remove openjdk-6 in wheezy. Probably would require falling back to
>>gcj. Not recommended as a runtime environment, but should work fine
>>for building packages, as ecj is used for byte-code compi
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 22:42 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > I gather there's a chance there might need to be further security
> > > updates; will that mean we need anoth
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:12:18PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7dfe-0003zb...@franck.debian.org
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazi
On 2013-02-17 23:04, Matthias Klose wrote:
> There is a bug report open for openjdk-6 in wheezy (#675495) and squeeze
> didn't
> see any security updates for several months. To summarize, no party involved
> is
> capable or willing to provide security updates based on backports of single
> patch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libmtp 1.1.3-35-g0ece104-5 which introduces
support for Google/LG Nexus 4 phones (and a big thanks! to Arno Töll
which has effectively tested the device.
The patch co
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I gather there's a chance there might need to be further security
> > updates; will that mean we need another update in p-u?
>
> Possibly; an alternative would be to releas
Your message dated Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:39:10 +
with message-id <1361140750.20472.121.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691710: Post-RC1 unblock-udeb d-i ACK
has caused the Debian Bug report #699466,
regarding unblock: cairo/1.12.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:39:10 +
with message-id <1361140750.20472.121.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#691710: Post-RC1 unblock-udeb d-i ACK
has caused the Debian Bug report #697831,
regarding unblock: eglibc/2.13-38
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7cxh-00078j...@franck.debian.org
Hi everyone,
and thanks for your patience. Release managers, here's your d-i ACK
for all those requests:
mdadm/3.2.5-5
glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-5
eglibc/2.13-38
cairo/1.12.2-3
openssh/1:6.0p1-4
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
There is a bug report open for openjdk-6 in wheezy (#675495) and squeeze didn't
see any security updates for several months. To summarize, no party involved is
capable or willing to provide security updates based on backports of single
patches to the released openjdk-6 version in a stable release.
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze2_kfreebsd-i386.changes
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_kfr
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > Security update has been uploaded. I'll post
Processing control commands:
> tags 700675 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #700675 [release.debian.org] pu: package fusionforge/5.0.2-5+squeeze1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #700675 to the same tags previously set
--
700675: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700675
Debian Bug Tra
Control: tags 700675 + confirmed squeeze
On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 20:25 +0100, Roland Mas wrote:
> Andreas Beckmann, 2013-02-16 12:03:01 +0100 :
> > The fusionforge packages are not really in a good shape for automated
> > testing (e.g. #678025, #662897) ... and I never used fusionforge
> > myself, s
Processing control commands:
> tags 700675 + confirmed squeeze
Bug #700675 [release.debian.org] pu: package fusionforge/5.0.2-5+squeeze1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
696369: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696369
700675: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700675
Debi
Processing changes file: ttf-ipafont_00203-16+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nautilus_2.30.1-2squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
Andreas Beckmann, 2013-02-16 12:03:01 +0100 :
[...]
> The fusionforge packages are not really in a good shape for automated
> testing (e.g. #678025, #662897) ... and I never used fusionforge
> myself, so I don't know how to properly test it manually. Therefore
> I'm a bit reluctant to NMU fusionf
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #700724 [release.debian.org] pu: package ttf-ipafont/00203-16+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
700724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 17:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 18:01 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > This leads to the following errors if ttf-ipafont is installed, removed
> > and installed again:
> >
> > 0m16.5s ERROR: FAIL: After purging files h
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2013-02-17 19:12, Mike Miller wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
Hi,
> Please unblock package openconnect, version 3.20-3 already uploaded to
> unstable
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #700806 [release.debian.org] unblock: openconnect/3.20-3 (Fixes
CVE-2012-6128)
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
700806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
-
Processing changes file: libzorpll_3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u79gt-00031a...@franck.debian.org
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #700523 [release.debian.org] pu: package nautilus/2.30.1-2squeeze2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
700523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 18:14 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 22:12 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > * libnautilus-extension1: Add Breaks: samba-common (<< 2:3.5) to fix an
> > upgrade path from lenny involving nautilus-share where lenny's apt
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #700672 [release.debian.org] pu: package libzorpll/3.3.0.12-4+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
700672: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700672
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSU
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 11:22 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 12:19 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > On 2013-02-16 11:10, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 00:02 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > >> An unversioned Breaks/Replaces s
Processing changes file: kfreebsd-8_8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze4_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u78ns-0003ja...@franck.debia
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu
i'd like to upload unbound 1.4.17-3 with an updated D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET
hint to testing/testing-proposed-updates to fix #697351. unstable has a
newer upstream release (1.4.19-1) so the update wi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
Please unblock package openconnect, version 3.20-3 already uploaded to
unstable. This upload fixes RC bug #700794 (CVE-2012-6128), a
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabi
Hi,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this.
On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 09:34 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> | Dovecot: robustness; better msg on missing mech.
[...]
> This fixes an exim segfault when accessing a malicious dovecot AUTH
> server. I have already talked with the securi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-tools
The version in wheezy had some issues (see #685752 which this request
supercedes and I will now close) with upgradability that, while not
typical use cases
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:32 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 01:41 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:28 -0800, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Security update has been uploaded. I'll post the builds somewhere as
> > > they become available for anyone interested
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:36:24AM +0100, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/17/2013 01:19 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > It's traditional to seek approval *before* uploading; more so in this case
> > since adding a
> patch system is a no-no. The
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 08:06:36AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I was involved reporting the problem: I noticed now a possible problem
> about the versioning:
>
> Current situation:
>
> pyrad | 1.2-1| squeeze| source
> pyrad | 1.2-1| wheezy | source
> pyrad | 1.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #696671 [release.debian.org] tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
696671: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696671
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCR
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >> I've attached an updated proposed patch, which also fixes #698582 (and
> >> consequentially #700363).
> > File attached.
> Really attached
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.2.11-6+squeeze9_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.2.11-6+squeeze9_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.2.11-6+squeeze9_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: wireshark_1.2.11-6+squeeze9_ia64.changes
ACCE
Processing changes file: kfreebsd-8_8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u72wy-0006b2...@franck.debi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #700277 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-8/8.1+dfsg-8+squeeze4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
700277: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700277
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNS
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 19:07 -0800, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> > Yes please! I was just about to ask if anyone is available to do this.
[...]
> Should be uploaded
Flagged for acceptance in to p-u; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 2013-02-17 00:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [Why the CC to debian-release? That's where mail for release.d.o bugs
> goes anyway...]
I trimmed down the recipients to only the bug, but didn't switch that
from Cc: to To:
[same in this mail, but now with To: 700563@]
> Ah. In that case, you just ne
Processing changes file: poppler_0.12.4-1.2+squeeze1_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u708l-0005ur...@franck.debian.org
59 matches
Mail list logo
