On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 13:33 -0800, dann frazier wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I gather there's a chance there might need to be further security > > updates; will that mean we need another update in p-u? > > Possibly; an alternative would be to release a 48squeeze1 via security > to sync up w/ the fixes just before the point release. That would let > us go ahead and get the lkdi/d-i updates ready and give us some > flexibility to react to any follow-on changes that may appear this > week as CVE-2013-0871 is discussed.
>From the release perspective, I obviously have a bias toward wanting to get a finalised kernel and lkdi / d-i sorted sooner rather than later, both so we can get people to test the former and to reduce the likelihood of last minute issues / upload chasing with the latter. > On the other hand, I know Ben has > another fix queued for stable, and I saw a mention of a possible > s390/KVM regression - so those may justify the extra p-u update. Are these regressions from the current stable kernel? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1361140954.20472.122.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
