On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:59:17PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Having this fix only
> in one of the two places Digest::SHA appears in wheezy is probably
> a Bad Thing, so maybe we should upload a fix for wheezy/perl after all.
Yes, I think we should (FWIW). Along with that, I suppose we ne
Hello.
mdadm bug 686100 (with a trivial patch that the release team can
surely review) has been fixed only in experimental, but not in sid or
in wheezy. Why?
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
> > If you think that it it better to take only the first and the last chunk,
> > just tell me.
> I would prefer that, yes. Otherwise no objections, please ping the bug when
> it's uploaded.
ok,
I remove the undesired part. The last chunck was changed a little bit since it
contains also the r
Processing changes file: swath_0.4.0-4+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swath_0.4.0-4+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swath_0.4.0-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swath_0.4.0-4+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swath_0.4.0-4+squeeze1_mipsel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: swath_0.4.0-4+squeeze1_s390.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bcron_0.09-11+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bcron_0.09-11+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing chan
On 2013-01-21 19:04, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Hi Andreas! We the qt-kde team, maintainers of the package, would like to
> avoid this approach.
I'm fine with everything fixing this upgrade issue.
> We suspect it's a subtle bug somewhere else or a bug in apt. Sune was trying
>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:38:43AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-01-22 23:59, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > Adding debian-release as CC.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:33:19AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >> Hi Dominic
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:26:09PM +, Dominic
On 2013-01-22 23:59, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Adding debian-release as CC.
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:33:19AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi Dominic
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:26:09PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:46:55PM +0100, Salvatore Bo
Adding debian-release as CC.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 07:33:19AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Dominic
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:26:09PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:46:55PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > Upload of Digest::SHA 5.81 mentio
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:13:47 +0100
with message-id <50ff1d2b.8090...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#697023: unblock: tvtime/1.0.2-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #697023,
regarding unblock: tvtime/1.0.2-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I would like to ask that gettext 0.18.1.1-10 is allowed in wheezy, as
it fully implements multiarch for -dev packages.
The changes to debian/rules are as small as they can be for a split
(w
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 07:33:59AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'm not sure why there'd be any repackaging needed? aiui no files have
> been removed, the license information contained in them has simply been
> updated.
correct. so if you want to update the "old" package to the newly
licensed d
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:05:02PM +, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Perhaps I'm wrong, but from what I can see only the first and last hunks
> > patching setup.py are actually relevant, the rest just renames the
> > argument? Did I miss something significant?
>
>
> Yes in fact I took the
Processing changes file: swath_0.4.0-4+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
movabletype-opensource_4.3.8+dfsg-0+squeeze3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:41:36 +
with message-id <1358890896.18231.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#696421: unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-2 (pre-approval)
has caused the Debian Bug report #696421,
regarding unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-2 (pre-approval)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:33:14 +0100
with message-id <50ff059a.6060...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#698589: unblock: umlet/11.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #698589,
regarding unblock: umlet/11.3-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On 2013-01-22 21:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 16:42 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I am considering to upload a new version of icedtea-web to unstable to
>> fix #693623. Currently, icedtea-web with Java7 does not work (at
>> least not with va
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #698621 [release.debian.org] pu: package swath/0.4.0-4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
698621: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698621
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 18:59 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 16:40 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> > swath has got a trivial security fix, addressing Bug #698189, which the
> > security team considers trivial enough to upload to stable-prop
Thanks for the hint. I have no good knowledge of shell and appreciate
your improvement. I've prepared and uploaded a new version of umlet.
Here is the debdiff:
> debdiff umlet_11.3-4.dsc umlet_11.3-5.dsc
diff -Nru umlet-11.3/debian/changelog umlet-11.3/debian/changelog
--- umlet-11.3/debian/chang
Processing changes file: ganglia_3.1.7-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ganglia_3.1.7-1+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ganglia_3.1.7-1+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ganglia_3.1.7-1+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processin
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 14:57 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>
> > as suggested by Jonathan below, I prepared a bcron package fixing
> > #686650 as candidate for the next squeeze point release. A debdiff is
> > attached, the package ready for u
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #696421 [release.debian.org] unblock: icedtea-web/1.3.1-2 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
696421: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696421
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
T
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 16:42 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am considering to upload a new version of icedtea-web to unstable to
> fix #693623. Currently, icedtea-web with Java7 does not work (at
> least not with various national internet banking application).
>
> Th
> Perhaps I'm wrong, but from what I can see only the first and last hunks
> patching setup.py are actually relevant, the rest just renames the
> argument? Did I miss something significant?
Yes in fact I took the patch from the upstream and adapt the rules file to use
the
renamed option.
If you
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:35:12 +
with message-id <1358883312.18231.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#695570: RM: pydoubles/1.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #695570,
regarding RM: pydoubles/1.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
I think it is not a problem that pydoubles nor doublex will be in next
release.
On Jan 19, 2013 2:45 PM, "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-01-19 at 14:21 +0100, David Villa wrote:
> > Yes, python-doublex superspeeds it and it is already at debian.
>
> It's not in wheezy, and won't be. I'll
On 22-01-13 15:21, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Openmotif 2.3.3-7 is an update to 2.3.3-5 to allow two release goals:
>> - code hardening
>
> This does not appear to close a bug and therefore, I presume, is there
> for not on the "target list" for Wheezy? If it is not on this list,
> then I would pref
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:45:40 +0100
with message-id <50fec234.70...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#694400: unblock: latex209/25.mar.1992-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #694400,
regarding unblock: latex209/25.mar.1992-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:53:30 +0100
with message-id <50fec40a.2080...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#697547: unblock: tpu (pre-approval)
qcontrol/0.4.2-7+wheezy2
has caused the Debian Bug report #697547,
regarding unblock: tpu (pre-approval) qcontrol/0.4.2-7+wheezy2
to be mar
On 2013-01-22 13:15, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Sorry to come again with an issue on dspam again. This time it's
about
bug #698580 - useless prompting at upgrade when no configuration file
have been modified. A mistake was made which made
/etc/dspam/dspam.d/{pgsql,mysql}.conf be conffiles and yet
On 2012-12-20 16:42, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi,
>
> I am considering to upload a new version of icedtea-web to unstable to
> fix #693623. Currently, icedtea-web with Java7 does n
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2013-01-20 05:32, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Technically, this can map a "0" to a "" - not sure how likely that is in
>> a "log_this" function, but you(r upstream) might have wanted
>> "unless(defined(
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #698434 [release.debian.org] unblock: mha4mysql-manager/0.53-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
698434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698434
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:32:37AM +, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> >The diff you sent doesn't contain these patches...
>
> Sorry about that, I did the debdiff with the .dsc but.
>
> So here the 2 patches
Perhaps I'm wrong, but from what I can see only the first and last hunks
patchi
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2013-01-19 20:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12-12-12 22:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 10-12-12 10:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> I'd recommend uploading 4) to experimental, compile a debdiff and send
>>> it our way. We may have to back down 3) or 1) once we see t
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #694850 [release.debian.org] license RC bug 679980 in cacti: request for
release-team opinion for wheezy
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
694850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
On 2013-01-19 18:11, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:43:24AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
I've prepared an NMU (diff attached) for testing-proposed-updates
as 0.3.4-1.2 which simply pulls the gtk patch out of the
unstable changes and makes no other changes.
Please confirm th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #698589 [release.debian.org] unblock: umlet/11.3-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
698589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2013-01-20 19:55, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package umlet
>
> The important bug #690271 is fixed. Nothing else was changed.
>
>> > deb
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2013-01-21 21:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package openmotif
>
> Openmotif 2.3.3-7 is an update to 2.3.3-5 to allow two release goals:
> -
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #698661 [release.debian.org] unblock: openmotif/2.3.3-7
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
698661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:31:48 +0100
with message-id <50fe94c4.5040...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#698671: unblock: mercurial/2.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #698671,
regarding unblock: mercurial/2.2.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:27:37 +0100
with message-id <50fe93c9.4070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#698643: unblock: kde-workspace/4.8.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #698643,
regarding unblock: kde-workspace/4.8.4-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dspam
Sorry to come again with an issue on dspam again. This time it's about
bug #698580 - useless prompting at upgrade when no configuration file
have been modified.
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 21:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (06/01/2013):
> > Thanks. It looks okay to me, but then so did the previous
> > versions. :-( Doing the CC-for-a-d-i-ack too in case there are any
> > comments from that side.
>
> AFAICT from the comments, can't be worse
46 matches
Mail list logo
