et, useful for basic network debugging/testing, +613 bytes.
Enable it.
+20120917 mjt i386 increase FEATURE_COPYBUF_KB from 4 to 64
+ textdata bss dec hex filename
+ 31271616698712 323097 4ee19 busybox+
+ 31295316778712 323342 4ef0e busybox+buf64k
+Icreases c
Your message dated Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:16:51 +0100
with message-id <1348204611.9484.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688275: unblock: jruby/1.5.6-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #688275,
regarding unblock: jruby/1.5.6-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team:
Please unblock package jruby. The upload of 1.5.6-4 includes a patch
for CVE-2011-4838 (#686867). The debdiff between this package and the
package in wheezy is attache
According to bug #678979 [0], which was submitted by the lead upstream
developer, slony 2.0 does not work well with postgresql 9.1. Therefore,
we had to resolve to making an upgrade to slony version 2.1, and I
request that that be allowed into wheezy now.
To be precise: The source package name is
Hi Adam,
> We'll check the bug you opened, and then reply to that. Once everything
> looks okay, we'll ask you to upload the package to ftp-master as you
> would for unstable; if you need a sponsor for unstable uploads then
> you'll need one in this case too.
I will ask my sponsor to upload the
Control: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 00:01 +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
> > Thanks for the quick response. That looks better, but... :-)
>
> You're right. Seems like I really need some more coffee :) Thank you. I've
> downloaded the current source package again and added my
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #688266 [release.debian.org] pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
--
688266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.o
Hi,
> Thanks for the quick response. That looks better, but... :-)
You're right. Seems like I really need some more coffee :) Thank you. I've
downloaded the current source package again and added my patches from
scratch. I hope it's OK now :)
Regards,
Werner
werner@squeeze:~$ debdiff policyd-w
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:36 +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
> > That looks a little odd. Those changes should be included in the
> > debdiff. If you unpack the new .dsc, does the result include the
> > patches?
>
> Just discovered a Typo in the naming of the patches. Fixed that and rebuilded
> the
Hi,
> That looks a little odd. Those changes should be included in the
> debdiff. If you unpack the new .dsc, does the result include the
> patches?
Just discovered a Typo in the naming of the patches. Fixed that and rebuilded
the package again,
here's the actual debdiff.
Thanks,
Werner
wern
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:19 +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
> > Take the stable package, make the necessary changes and create a changelog
> > stanza for 0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1 with distribution "squeeze". Build
> > that in a stable chroot (or on a stable system) and generate a debdiff
> > against 0.1.
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 23:10 +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
> The policyd-weight package in stable should be updated as it still uses a
> non functional DNSBL. Furthermore the DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org will
> be shut down on 2012-11-30 (the announcement from the lists operator can
> be found here:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
The policyd-weight package in stable should be updated as it still uses a
non functional DNSBL. Furthermore the DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org will
be shut down on 2012-11-30 (the announcement fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
> Take the stable package, make the necessary changes and create a changelog
> stanza for 0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1 with distribution "squeeze". Build
> that in a stable chroot (or on a stable system) and generate a debdiff
> against 0.1.15.1-2
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:39:48 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> I have uploaded an updated 'condor' package to experimental. It fixes
> all remaining (user-relevant) annoyances of the current version in
> testing. The fixes are only a few lines per bug, and they are only
> c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package dbtoepub
The files have been installed into a ruby 1.8 related location.
Therefor dbtoepub failed to run recently [1].
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package bluefish
* debian/patches/fix_segfault_blocksync.patch: Added.
- Fix a segmentation fault in the block synchroniz
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:38:27PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:00:49PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > > I have uploaded an updated 'condor' package to experimental. It fixes
> > > all remaining (user-re
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 21:12 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hence you can go ahead and prepare a debdiff for the final ACK.
Thanks. Attached is the debdiff from 0.7.15+squeeze1 to 0.7.15+squeeze2.
> Thanks and sorry for the long waiting period
No problem. Thanks for reviewing.
--
-- arthur - adej
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock autoconf-dickey, it fixes an inadvertent and undeclared
dependency on mawk (#687957).
unblock autoconf-dickey/2.52+20101002-2
Full debdiff follows:
diff -Nru autoconf-dicke
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xorg-server. This is an update from upstream's
stable branch, has been in sid for almost a month with no reported
regression. I have some more fixes queued up for af
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:26:30 +0100
with message-id <1348165590.9484.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688232: RM: src:fusionforge/5.2~rc1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #688232,
regarding RM: src:fusionforge/5.2~rc1-5
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:20:09 +0100
with message-id <1348165209.9484.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688221: unblock: telepathy-mission-control-5/1:5.12.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688221,
regarding unblock: telepathy-mission-control-5/1:5.1
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:53:28 +0100
with message-id <1348163608.9484.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688237: nmu: mapnik_2.0.0+ds1-3+b3
has caused the Debian Bug report #688237,
regarding nmu: mapnik_2.0.0+ds1-3+b3
to be marked as done.
This means th
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 18:06:46 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hello,
> please binNMU mapnik, since last time it was built, libsigc++ wasn't
> multiarchified, and thus mapnik-confi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
The beanstalkd version in testing (1.4.6) is FTBFS (#687402) since libevent
was upgraded from 1.4 to 2.0.
Meanwhile beanstalkd 1.5 was released and dropped the libevent dependency all
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
please binNMU mapnik, since last time it was built, libsigc++ wasn't
multiarchified, and thus mapnik-config now reports wrong paths.
nmu mapnik_2.0.0+ds1-3+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild agai
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove the current fusionforge source package from
testing/wheezy (sid and stable can stay).
It grieves us to have to admit it, but the current state of the
packaging for FusionForge is n
On 20.09.2012 09:33, Werner Detter wrote:
I've just recreated a policyd-weight package (0.1.15.2-4). The new
package already entered unstable, it includes a new quilt-patch which
removes several DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org due to a service
shutdown of the rfc-ignorant.org lists on 2012-11-30.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider:
unblock telepathy-mission-control-5/1:5.12.3-1
for which the changelog is:
telepathy-mission-control-5 (1:5.12.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream stable rel
On 20.09.2012 14:52, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> The reason is scim-anthy was unblocked (Bug#685036) and migrated to
> testing but scim (1.4.14-2) still stops in unstable. So, release
> managers, can you consider to unblock scim to fix RC as well?
Yamane-San,
thank you for your report. Hello from To
32:27.0 +0400
@@ -94,3 +94,17 @@
ping applet, useful for basic network debugging/testing, +613 bytes.
Enable it.
+20120917 mjt i386 increase FEATURE_COPYBUF_KB from 4 to 64
+ textdata bss dec hex filename
+ 31271616698712 323097 4ee19 busybox+
+ 31295316
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 680335 688187
Bug #680335 [release.debian.org] unblock: scim/1.4.14-2
Bug #688187 [release.debian.org] unblock: scim/1.4.14-2
Merged 680335 688187
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
680335: htt
Hi Joachim,
On 20.09.2012 09:30, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2012, 00:12 +0200 schrieb bi...@debian.org:
>> Source: libnss-gw-name
>> Version: 0.2.1-1
>> Severity: normal
>> User: pkg-utopia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>> Usertags: libnl1-removal
>>
>> Hi,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Adam,
>> I've just recreated a policyd-weight package (0.1.15.2-4). The new package
>> already entered unstable, it includes a new quilt-patch which
>> removes several DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org due to a service shutdown of
>> the rfc-ignoran
On 2012-09-19 22:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please could you expand a little on why you feel adding the dependency
> would be a better solution than making the use of udev optional via the
> LSB headers as (as you noted) was done for wheezy?
I do not know the lvm2 package well enough to judge wh
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 20.09.2012, 00:12 +0200 schrieb bi...@debian.org:
> Source: libnss-gw-name
> Version: 0.2.1-1
> Severity: normal
> User: pkg-utopia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: libnl1-removal
>
> Hi,
>
> libnss-gw-name has a build-dependency on libnl-dev [1].
> libnl-1.
On 2012-09-20 07:30, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Andreas Beckmann (deb...@abeckmann.de):
>> Please unblock package fglrx-driver
>
> I very strongly object to this.
> I appreciate the effort you have put up to now in maintaining this
> package in an l10n-friendly way so I think we can easil
38 matches
Mail list logo
