Cyril Brulebois (04/03/2012):
> Looks good so far, just scheduled binNMU for sipwitch everywhere but on
> s390x.
Everything looks ready from here, except libexosip2/s390x and
sipwitch/s390x which can now be binNMU'd. Those won't be any blocker
anyway since s390x isn't considered when looking at c
Your message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2012 05:23:29 +0100
with message-id <20120306042329.gc29...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#634797: opencv 2.3 transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #634797,
regarding opencv 2.3 transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:40 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ready to transition: mumps,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 17:03:51 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Oh dear. Do we need to do this for every reverse-depends package in
> order for the whole thing to transition?
>
Yes. If you have a list of debs a single bug probably works though.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Dig
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 21:33:06 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 05/03/2012 04:23, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
> > Please change Build-Depends of the package from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev.
>
> PTS says that camlimages is part of libtiff4-symbols transition. Can I
> upload it anyway?
>
You c
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> >
> > > Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these
> > > didn't go into testin
Le 05/03/2012 04:23, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
> Please change Build-Depends of the package from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev.
PTS says that camlimages is part of libtiff4-symbols transition. Can I
upload it anyway?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists
Hi,
I noticed that you've uploaded "wims" to stable, in order to resolve
#574235. Was this discussed with any member of the Release Team
beforehand? If so, please could you point me at that discussion,
because I'm currently unable to find it.
(Looking at the bug log, I can see that you were poi
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 07:33:34 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> How does that sound?
>
I'd rather get as many "FTBFS against libpng 1.5" bugs as possible fixed
now. Then after wheezy make the actual switch.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:09:16 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> nmu exactimage_0.8.5-3 . ALL . -m "Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)"
> nmu libexpect-php5_0.3.1-1 . ALL . -m "Recompile with PHP 5.4
> (phpapi-20100525)"
> nmu libhdate_1.4.20-4 . ALL . -m "Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-2010052
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:31:06PM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> I reuploaded w/o that patch - that fix was POWER7 specific, and it
> looks like POWER7 support wasn't supported in the lenny timeframe
> anyway.
POWER7 only really got added to the installer in 6.0.4 (not even 6.0)
so, seems perfectly
On 03/05/2012 11:08 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-03-05 10:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> peter green (05/03/2012):
>> Yes. See:
>> http://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html#openjdk-6
>> (The sparc part will go away, given the build has been accepted a
>> few hours ago.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:29:58PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 29.02.2012 17:20, dann frazier wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:20:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>Feel free to go ahead with the kernel upload, so we can get it
> >>chucked at the buildds.
> [...]
> >Ack.
>
> Unfortu
Le Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:51:35AM +, Tim Booth a écrit :
>
> I'll be up at the EBI in a couple of weeks. Is there anything I can do
> to try and persuade them to grant an acceptable license or has this
> already been tried? EMBOSS is a software package that I still consider
> to be very imp
Hi Charles,
I'll be up at the EBI in a couple of weeks. Is there anything I can do
to try and persuade them to grant an acceptable license or has this
already been tried? EMBOSS is a software package that I still consider
to be very important, even though development is currently stalled due
to
Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:30:33 +0100
with message-id <20120305113033.gb7...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#662610: nmu: sqlkit_0.9.2.1-1 [experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #662610,
regarding nmu: sqlkit_0.9.2.1-1 [experimental]
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 657077 662618
Bug#657077: transition: php5 5.4
Bug#662618: nmu: php5.4 binNMUable package (phpapi-20100525)
Forcibly Merged 657077 662618.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657077: http:/
* Andreas Beckmann , 2012-03-05, 11:15:
nmu sqlkit_0.9.2.1-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild vs. python 2.7"
You can't binNMU arch:all packages. It needs a sourceful upload.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu exactimage_0.8.5-3 . ALL . -m "Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)"
nmu libexpect-php5_0.3.1-1 . ALL . -m "Recompile with PHP 5.4 (phpapi-20100525)"
nmu libhdate_1.4.20-4 . ALL . -m
On 05.03.2012 09:59, peter green wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
That page says the request should ideally come from the
maintainers with the release team also being acceptable hence me
sending a mail to them rather than filing a removal request myself.
It says "The Relea
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu sqlkit_0.9.2.1-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild vs. python 2.7"
Hi,
please schedule binNMUs for sqlkit/experimental. Rebuilding the package
is sufficient to get python 2.7 support, making the pack
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
That page says the request should ideally come from the maintainers with
the release team also being acceptable hence me sending a mail to them
rather than filing a removal request myself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@list
Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:10:45 +0100
with message-id <20120305101045.ga7...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#652479: transition: libindicator, libdbusmenu,
libindicate
has caused the Debian Bug report #652479,
regarding transition: libindicator, libdbusmenu, libindicate
to be marked
On 2012-03-05 10:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> peter green (05/03/2012):
>> Recent versions of the openjdk-6 package have stopped producing the
>> binary package "openjdk-6-jre-zero" on powerpc. The old binary is
>> currently preventing openjdk-6 migrating to testing. Should this old
>> binary be r
Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:51:25 +0100
with message-id <20120305095125.gd4...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#662604: nmu: refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2
[experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #662604,
regarding nmu: refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2 [experimental]
to be mark
peter green (05/03/2012):
> Recent versions of the openjdk-6 package have stopped producing the
> binary package "openjdk-6-jre-zero" on powerpc. The old binary is
> currently preventing openjdk-6 migrating to testing. Should this old
> binary be removed from the archive so the package can migrate
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild vs. current binutils"
Hi,
please schedule binNMUs for refdbg/experimental. The current version is
not installable:
The following pa
Recent versions of the openjdk-6 package have stopped producing the
binary package "openjdk-6-jre-zero" on powerpc. The old binary is
currently preventing openjdk-6 migrating to testing. Should this old
binary be removed from the archive so the package can migrate?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:16:55PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 23:50:11 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: binnmu
> >
> > Please schedule the followin
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:49:16AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Thanks for moving this upwards on my TODO list. Of course things turned
> out to be more complicated. New upstream version had some issues,
> upstream needs more time, now libpng transition needs to be dealt with
> for ODIN. If am luc
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 09:49:16 +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:17:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 09:38:51 +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > > I will upload a new SO version of LIBVIA shortly. Right now only ODIN
> > > and LIPSIA use
Am 04.03.2012 00:53, schrieb Ansgar Burchardt:
I just did so.
Thank you very much!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f547b5a.4000...@greffrath.com
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 11:17:56PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 09:38:51 +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > I will upload a new SO version of LIBVIA shortly. Right now only ODIN
> > and LIPSIA use this library. The LIBVIA dependency of ODIN will be
> > dropped by the nex
33 matches
Mail list logo
