Your message dated Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:51:25 +0100
with message-id <20120305095125.gd4...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#662604: nmu: refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2
[experimental]
has caused the Debian Bug report #662604,
regarding nmu: refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2 [experimental]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
662604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662604
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild vs. current binutils"
Hi,
please schedule binNMUs for refdbg/experimental. The current version is
not installable:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
refdbg : Depends: binutils (< 2.20.2) but 2.22-5 is to be installed
but it rebuilds cleanly in a sid+experimental [amd64] chroot and
generates these
Depends: binutils (>= 2.22), binutils (<< 2.23), libc6 (>= 2.7),
libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.16.0), libglib2.0-0-refdbg (>= 2.27.4-2)
Thanks,
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Andreas Beckmann <deb...@abeckmann.de> (05/03/2012):
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild vs. current binutils"
Done, but this way (note the extra parameter to target experimental):
nmu refdbg_1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against current
binutils.' -d experimental
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
