Hi Corsac,
Yves-Alexis Perez (20/02/2012):
> I'd like to push an update for xfce4-weather-plugin, to fix #647749.
> Short summary is that the license key for the XOAP webservice doesn't
> work anymore, but changing the key, while not beeing the perfect
> solution, works for now.
(Out of curiosit
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze7_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze7_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze7_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: icedove_3.0.11-1+squeeze7_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Proce
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:12:00PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > -kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
> > upload for lenny? If so we need to get those sorted asap.
>
> *prod*?
I got nothing. Dann?
B
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi SRT,
I'd like to push an update for xfce4-weather-plugin, to fix #647749.
Short summary is that the license key for the XOAP webservice doesn't
work anymore, but changing the key, while not b
Processing changes file: openvpn_2.1.3-2+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rzb4a-00050f...@franck.debian.org
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:39 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:45 +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:23:15PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta (20/02/2012):
> > > (I thought we ought to be using DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS fo
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> -kernel, -boot - were there any plans for a final kernel and/or d-i
> upload for lenny? If so we need to get those sorted asap.
*prod*?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:36 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 25-26/2 - Steve's not available for CDs
>
> 3-4/3 - Cambridge BSP. Should be do-able as long as I can get decent
> connectivity at the right time. :-)
>
> 10-11/3 - Joerg mentioned he's not available on the Sunday, but that's
> only rea
Processing changes file: libvorbis_1.3.1-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvorbis_1.3.1-1+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvorbis_1.3.1-1+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libvorbis_1.3.1-1+squeeze1_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
P
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:15 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:04:20AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > On Mon, February 20, 2012 03:46, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > diff -Nru openssh-5.5p1/debian/changelog openssh-5.5p1/debian/changelog
> > > --- openssh-5.5p1/debian/chang
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:04:20AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> On Mon, February 20, 2012 03:46, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:44:26PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:50:24PM -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> >> > Looks like thi
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 18:45 +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:23:15PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta (20/02/2012):
> > (I thought we ought to be using DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS for that?
>
> Fixed that too. Thanks Cyril and Julien.
>
> I'll w
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 04:23:15PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta (20/02/2012):
> > Sure, find it attached.
>
> Looks good to me. One remark though: 2.1.3-2+squeeze1 would be more
> customary, so please use that instead. You might want to wait for a
> confirmation from A
Hello,
No, it is not a mistake. It has been decided during the Paris BSP of
this week end that this bug should not block the transition, especially
since things should moved in the future regarding this issue.
Sylvestre
Le lundi 20 février 2012 à 18:10 +0100, Anton Gladky a écrit :
> Is it a mi
Ok, thank you for explanation.
Anton
2012/2/20 Sylvestre Ledru :
> Hello,
>
> No, it is not a mistake. It has been decided during the Paris BSP of
> this week end that this bug should not block the transition, especially
> since things should moved in the future regarding this issue.
>
> Sylves
Hi,
as you probably know, we have iceweasel 10 in unstable, and Mike is
quite happy about its current state. Tracker for its migration:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/iceweasel10.html
Affected (bad) packages:
chmsee
couchdb
edbrowse
gxine
oolite
chmsee wants xulrunner-*,
Hi,
would it be possible to get at least the timescale in which I should
expect the reply to this email?
(I know you are busy, I know you are volunteers, but same applies to
me, and I need that just for planning purposes of my time.)
Thanks,
Ondrej
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 22:11, Ondřej Surý wro
Michael Biebl (19/02/2012):
> nmu libproxy_0.3.1-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs10d"
Not needed, all failed, giving back will do the job.
> dw libproxy_0.3.1-4 . ALL . -m "libmozjs-dev (>= 10.0.2-1)"
Done (the dw triggers a give back automatically, so we're fine).
Mraw,
KiBi.
signatur
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:56:58 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> Do I have to do anything to ask for all tiff reverse dependencies to be
>> automatically rebuild (other than mentioning it here)? I expect the
>> uploads within half an hour.
>
> I'll take care of this onc
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 15:44:35 +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
> diff -Nru openvpn-2.1.3/debian/changelog openvpn-2.1.3/debian/changelog
> --- openvpn-2.1.3/debian/changelog2010-10-21 10:23:02.0 +
> +++ openvpn-2.1.3/debian/changelog2012-02-20 14:28:50.0 +
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:56:58 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Do I have to do anything to ask for all tiff reverse dependencies to be
> automatically rebuild (other than mentioning it here)? I expect the
> uploads within half an hour.
I'll take care of this once the new version is in testing.
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta (20/02/2012):
> Sure, find it attached.
Looks good to me. One remark though: 2.1.3-2+squeeze1 would be more
customary, so please use that instead. You might want to wait for a
confirmation from Adam, but I think you can upload once the version
number is fixed.
Why it's p
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 07:05:25 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> Any objections to this plan? I would probably wait until after wheezy
>> to work on removal of tiff3, but I guess we could move libtiff-dev to
>> libtiff5-dev sooner than that if lots of packages
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 658289 + pending
Bug #658289 [release.debian.org] transition: python-numpy
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
658289: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658289
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 656587 + pending
Bug #656587 [release.debian.org] transition: libmusicbrainz-2.1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
656587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 653823 + pending
Bug #653823 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
653823: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6538
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 02:59:07PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta (20/02/2012):
> > I'd like to upload openvpn to stable in order to fix #646221. This bug
> > makes the package almost nonfunctional in kfreebsd archs. The patch (in
> > the bug report) is trivial a
Hi!
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta (20/02/2012):
> I'd like to upload openvpn to stable in order to fix #646221. This bug
> makes the package almost nonfunctional in kfreebsd archs. The patch (in
> the bug report) is trivial and it's been already tested in sid and
> wheezy.
I like the sound of trivial
Dear Release Team,
I'd like to upload openvpn to stable in order to fix #646221. This bug
makes the package almost nonfunctional in kfreebsd archs. The patch (in
the bug report) is trivial and it's been already tested in sid and
wheezy.
Please let me know if I should proceed with an upload.
Than
Dear Release Team,
Quite a while ago Adeodato Simó said in a message to -devel[1]:
Personally I couldn’t care less about installability problems on
user’s machines running unstable: my take is that those machines
should have testing in sources.list, period.
[1] http://lists.debian.
30 matches
Mail list logo
