Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 07:05:25 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > [snip] >> Any objections to this plan? I would probably wait until after wheezy >> to work on removal of tiff3, but I guess we could move libtiff-dev to >> libtiff5-dev sooner than that if lots of packages work fine with it. >> But we don't necessarily have to. >> > The plan sounds good to me, fwiw. Sorry for the delay in replying.
No problem. Coincidentally, I am in the process of preparing uploads for unstable since upstream released this weekend. I guess the next step will be sometime post-wheezy when we try to push to get rid of tiff3 from the archive. Do I have to do anything to ask for all tiff reverse dependencies to be automatically rebuild (other than mentioning it here)? I expect the uploads within half an hour. -- Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120220095658.0204565560.qww314...@jberkenbilt-linux.appiancorp.com
