On 05.02.2012 23:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> FWIW: vlc is also involved in the libupnp (planned) and iceweasel9
> (mostly finished) transitions.
icweasel 10 was just uploaded a few days ago, fwiw.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 11:26:58PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I think I'll process this one right after x264, which involves vlc too.
> See you in a few days, and sorry for the delay.
Thanks for the advice, I saw there are a few in progress at the moment.
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 21:58 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt (05/02/2012):
> > Uploaded.
>
> Flagged for acceptance, thanks.
And pushed via squeeze-updates (pending dinstall to get it to mirrors).
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia
Cyril Brulebois (24/01/2012):
> I'll try and check it up, and where to find a slot compatible with
> other transitions. Reminders welcome in any cases.
I think I'll process this one right after x264, which involves vlc too.
See you in a few days, and sorry for the delay.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.
Hi,
Reinhard Tartler (05/02/2012):
> Now with libx264-120 in the archive, we can start transtion the
> existing packages to the archive so that the new x264 package can
> transition to testing. The following source packages need to be
> rebuilt:
>
> gst-plugins-ugly0.10
> libav
> libav-extra
> l
---
debian/changelog |3 +++
debian/control |4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 8703f78..34a2dbe 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ debian.org (46) Xnstable; urgency=low
[ R
Hi dear release team,
Now with libx264-120 in the archive, we can start transtion the existing
packages to the archive so that the new x264 package can transition to
testing. The following source packages need to be rebuilt:
gst-plugins-ugly0.10
libav
libav-extra
libquicktime
mplayer
vlc
In term
Processing changes file: clive_2.2.13-5+squeeze4_multi.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ru9dp-0002y3...@franck.debian.org
Hi Adam,
On So 05 Feb 2012 16:42:31 CET "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 01:47 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
1.) #650258 [i|+|?] [gosa] dhcpHost not removed if system is removed
-> already fixed in sid
2.) #657086 [i| | ] [gosa] gosa: Should use characters in
idGenerator r
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 657288 with 658753
Bug #657288 [release.debian.org] transition: gdcm
Was blocked by: 658753
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #657288 to the same blocks
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
While this post-processing of generated HTML files is kind of ugly, it
makes it easy to show which transitions might be entangled due to
collisions.
---
Makefile |2 +
bin/tcd.py | 70 ++
media/revamp.css |2 +-
3 files ch
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 657722 + pending
Bug #657722 [release.debian.org] pu: package clive/2.2.13-5+squeeze4
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Ansgar Burchardt (05/02/2012):
> Uploaded.
Flagged for acceptance, thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 657288 with 658753
Bug #657288 [release.debian.org] transition: gdcm
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 657288: 658753
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657288: http://bugs.d
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>> - binNMU insighttoolkit
>
> I've now scheduled that and will look at scheduling the other packages
> (see http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gdcm.html) once
> insighttoolkit's done.
excellent !
>> igstk is not using gdcm API and t
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 13:02 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> clive needs another update to handle changes to youtube.com. The
>> problem was initially reported (and fixed in unstable) in October[1],
>> but when I looked into preparing an update to stable the change wa
Processing changes file: cacti_0.8.7b-2.1+lenny5_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ru4xv-00078o...@franck.debian.org
Processing changes file: xen-qemu-dm-4.0_4.0.1-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xen-qemu-dm-4.0_4.0.1-2+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 657722 + squeeze confirmed
Bug #657722 [release.debian.org] pu: package clive/2.2.13-5+squeeze4
Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
657722: http://bugs.debian.or
tag 657722 + squeeze confirmed
thanks
On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 13:02 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> clive needs another update to handle changes to youtube.com. The
> problem was initially reported (and fixed in unstable) in October[1],
> but when I looked into preparing an update to stable the ch
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:14 +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> I got a bug (1) for the GOsa package, that prevents GOsa from removing a host
> from the DHCP configuration if it gets removed. Is it possible to get the
> attached patch for 2.6.11-4 into a future stable update release?
[...]
> (1) http
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 01:47 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> 1.) #650258 [i|+|☺] [gosa] dhcpHost not removed if system is removed
> -> already fixed in sid
>
> 2.) #657086 [i| | ] [gosa] gosa: Should use characters in idGenerator rule,
> not bytes
> -> only occurs i
On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 12:31 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Sunday 05 February 2012 02:56 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Feb 2012, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >> > Please review the attached diff. This change will fix bug 647563.
>
> > Looks like /usr/share/laptop-mode-
Cyril Brulebois (05/02/2012):
> You may click “good” to see that mostly everything is green, so more
> or less ready to transition. Since your package seems to be unaffected
> (neither good or bad), I think it should be OK to upload it now, but
> you may want for a confirmation from another releas
Hi,
and thanks for checking with us.
Roland Stigge (05/02/2012):
> There is a new gnubiff upstream version that I would like to integrate
> because it supports GNOME 3.
Would it get a dependency on libaudiofile* in the process? If so, please
hold off.
> What do I need to take into account befo
Hi,
at http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnubiff.html, I'm told that gnubiff
is involved in the audiofile transition (although it doesn't directly
depend on it).
There is a new gnubiff upstream version that I would like to integrate
because it supports GNOME 3.
What do I need to take into account
26 matches
Mail list logo
