Bug#649460: release.debian.org: improved architecture annotation in dependency analysis script/page

2011-11-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
Maybe the real issue here is that the build-depends dependency analysis is only done on i386 (according to the wording "including build-depends; i386 only"), and the ia32-libs-dev package of course doesn't exist there? Anyway, I think my original point remains. For the dependency analysis to be u

Bug#649460: release.debian.org: improved architecture annotation in dependency analysis script/page

2011-11-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 23:59 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> > The reason that wine-unstable isn't migrating is listed at the top of >> > the page: >> > >> >    wine-unstable is not

Bug#649460: release.debian.org: improved architecture annotation in dependency analysis script/page

2011-11-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 01:39 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: >alternative 1/2: wine-unstable [kfreebsd-amd64] depends on > ia32-libs-dev [kfreebsd-amd64] which is not available in testing > > and so on for all of the other cases; instead of the current arch-less > listing e.g. > > alternativ

Re: Updating stable Cherokee 1.0.8-5 to avoid a predictable password generation

2011-11-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 18:47 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Adam D. Barratt dijo [Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:52:16PM +]: > > Unfortunately, only the .changes files in DELAYED (well, DEFERRED/ once > > it actually reaches the file system on ftp-master) are world-readable, > > so I can't run a debdiff.

Bug#649460: release.debian.org: improved architecture annotation in dependency analysis script/page

2011-11-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 23:59 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > The reason that wine-unstable isn't migrating is listed at the top of > > the page: > > > >wine-unstable is not yet built on amd64: 1.1.34-1 vs 1.1.35-1 (missing > > 19 binar

Bug#649460: release.debian.org: improved architecture annotation in dependency analysis script/page

2011-11-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > In any case, you appear to have overlooked the fundamental issue.  The > reason that wine-unstable isn't migrating has nothing to do with > kfreebsd-amd64.  I assume you're deducing this from the "dependency > analysis" section - the section

Bug#649805: nmu: libfiu_0.14-2

2011-11-23 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libfiu_0.14-2 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against python 2.7" python-fiu/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: python (<< 2.7) Looks like the amd64 package was not built in a clean sid environment and

Re: Updating stable Cherokee 1.0.8-5 to avoid a predictable password generation

2011-11-23 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Adam D. Barratt dijo [Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:52:16PM +]: > For any future updates, please include a full debdiff, rather than just > the isolated patch. It might seem slightly picky, but often the debdiff > ends up being more involved than just changelog + patch. In this case it was just the

Bug#649078: marked as done (binNMU: pyabiword 0.8.0-8.1)

2011-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:02:49 +0100 with message-id <2023230248.gp3...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#649078: binNMU: pyabiword 0.8.0-8.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #649078, regarding binNMU: pyabiword 0.8.0-8.1 to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Re: Updating stable Cherokee 1.0.8-5 to avoid a predictable password generation

2011-11-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 12:35 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I have backported the attached patch and will be uploading Cherokee > 1.0.8-5+squeeze1. For any future updates, please include a full debdiff, rather than just the isolated patch. It might seem slightly picky, but often the debdiff ends up b

Bug#623148: pu: package webkit/1.2.7-0+squeeze2

2011-11-23 Thread Simon Paillard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 07:32:47PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 09:56 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 21:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 15:

Bug#649774: marked as done (nmu: opendchub_0.8.2-2)

2011-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:26:46 +0100 with message-id <2023222646.go3...@radis.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#649774: nmu: opendchub_0.8.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #649774, regarding nmu: opendchub_0.8.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#649774: nmu: opendchub_0.8.2-2

2011-11-23 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu opendchub_0.8.2-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against perl 5.14" opendchub is currently uninstallable in sid due to its dependency on libperl5.10. Rebuilding against perl 5.14 works fine without

Bug#649773: nmu: omniorb-dfsg_4.1.5-2

2011-11-23 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu omniorb-dfsg_4.1.5-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against python 2.7" omiidl is not installable in sid due to E: pycompile:234: Requested versions are not installed http://piuparts.debian.org/s

Re: adolc source tarball repack

2011-11-23 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Sorry; I assumed no word meant no objections and I should go ahead. In any case this is a simple one: copyright problem, no real changes to the generated binaries. And I'll be happy with whatever you decide. --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-re

Updating stable Cherokee 1.0.8-5 to avoid a predictable password generation

2011-11-23 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Hi, I have backported the attached patch and will be uploading Cherokee 1.0.8-5+squeeze1. This is in order to address #647205, to which (as the security impact is very small) the DSA team requested me to perform the upload to a point release. I know the instructions state that I should first disc

Bug#648918: Rebuilds done

2011-11-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
Just waiting for Qscintilla2 to age to get into Testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ecd1e53.9060...@kitterman.com

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-11-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, I'll try to share some news with the release team. On Sat, 22 Oct 2011, Guillem Jover wrote: > What I'll do though, when I get back home tomorrow from my current > trip, is to push already reviewed stuff and keep pushing incrementally, > instead of my usual big pushes, so that the progress is

Re: adolc source tarball repack

2011-11-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:55:38 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: I'd like to upload a tweaked adolc for the next stable update. There are no changes to the binaries, but the source tarball in stable contains non-free files. See http://bugs.debian.org/641489 for details, and for the packaged fix (

Re: Bugs in stable c-ares package

2011-11-23 Thread Gregor Jasny
Hello Adam, On 11/22/11 10:24 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 16:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 20:51 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote: >>> Uploaded to mentors for reviewing and testing: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/c-ares/c-ares_1.7.3-1squee

Proposed stable update: nginx

2011-11-23 Thread Kartik Mistry
Dear Release team, Security team has recently identify possible security issue [0] in Stable release for nginx which only affects Stable release for Debian [1]. It is suggested by Security team member that issue can be better fixed by Stable upload. So, I've prepared and tested nginx stable pa