On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 01:39 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > alternative 1/2: wine-unstable [kfreebsd-amd64] depends on > ia32-libs-dev [kfreebsd-amd64] which is not available in testing > > and so on for all of the other cases; instead of the current arch-less > listing e.g. > > alternative 1/2: wine-unstable depends on ia32-libs-dev which is > not available in testing
Well, either version is equally wrong, to be honest. wine-unstable *build-depends* on ia32-libs-dev. As such, the fact that ia32-libs-dev doesn't exist on kfreebsd-amd64 in testing is utterly irrelevant. (Although as I've already attempted to explain - apparently unsuccessfully - any mention of kfreebsd-amd64 is a complete red herring in terms of the package's testing migration in any case.) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1322116851.3182.37.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
