Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils

2011-11-22 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 09:09:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 06:50 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:33:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 07:52 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] > > > > + * Bulk load only helper mo

Bug#649339: vtk 5.8 transition

2011-11-22 Thread Dominique Belhachemi
Those packages build-depend on vtk. Please schedule a rebuild if possible. Thanks. activiz.net ants caret gdcm ifrit igstk itksnap kwwidgets libmesh odin openmeeg salome therion vtkedge yade -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "u

NEW changes in oldproposedupdates

2011-11-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: puppet_0.24.5-3+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: puppet_0.24.5-3+lenny2_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#649648: transition: gnome-desktop3

2011-11-22 Thread Michael Biebl
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, on our road to GNOME 3.2, we'd like to start the gnome-desktop3 transition now. The libgnome-desktop library had a soname bump libgnome-desktop-3.so.0 → libgnome-desktop-3.so.2. Pac

Re: [SRU] update for powertop in 6.0.1

2011-11-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 18:18 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 01:39:03PM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > > > Impressive design. What would happen if it skips half of the "config"? I > > > agree that not segfaulting is incredibly better than segfaulting, but like > > > this the

Re: tentative upload to stable-proposed-updates [cython]

2011-11-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 09:06 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:47:53 +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > I wonder, is there any chance to get this trivial fix for Squeeze > > regression into Squeeze actually? > > Now that we're aware that it's been fixed in unstable, sure. If we'

Bug#649347: marked as done (nmu: ledger_3.0.0~20100623+eda6cbd-1)

2011-11-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:23:25 + with message-id <1321997005.16755.8.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#649347: nmu: ledger_3.0.0~20100623+eda6cbd-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #649347, regarding nmu: ledger_3.0.0~20100623+eda6cbd-1 to be marked as

Re: Bugs in stable c-ares package

2011-11-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-11-06 at 16:17 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 20:51 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote: > > On 11/5/11 3:26 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 18:36 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote: > > >> 1) Update stable version with the single patch from the bug report >

Bug#648263: marked as done (nmu: ekiga_3.3.1-2 (from experimental))

2011-11-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:13:58 + with message-id <1321996438.16755.4.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> and subject line Re: Bug#648263: nmu: ekiga_3.3.1-2 (from experimental) has caused the Debian Bug report #648263, regarding nmu: ekiga_3.3.1-2 (from experimental) to be marked

Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils

2011-11-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 06:50 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:33:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 07:52 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] > > Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this. and again :-( - although not quite as long t

Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available

2011-11-22 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:07:30AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Moritz Muehlenhoff: > > > As for stable/oldstable: I noticed that Red Hat provided packages for > > update 29 for RHEL 4 (RHEL 5 onwards use OpenJDK): > > http://lwn.net/Articles/463919/ > > If anyone remembers the rationale beh

adolc source tarball repack

2011-11-22 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I'd like to upload a tweaked adolc for the next stable update. There are no changes to the binaries, but the source tarball in stable contains non-free files. See http://bugs.debian.org/641489 for details, and for the packaged fix (in git) which is identical to the version in testing except that t

Processed: tagging 649339

2011-11-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 649339 + pending Bug #649339 [release.debian.org] vtk 5.8 transition Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649339: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649339 Debia

Bug#649339: vtk 5.8 transition

2011-11-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 21:52:15 -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > > Hi, > > I would like to upload vtk-5.8.0 to unstable. It fixes the dependency > issues we had with vtk