NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-09-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze6_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze6_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze6_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBS

Re: Upcoming Point Releases

2011-09-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 21:30 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi, > > we finally got target dates for the next point releases of both Lenny > and Squeeze. Lenny should get 5.0.9 on October 1st; Squeeze will follow > on October 8th with 6.0.3. > > NEW for Lenny will be closed on the weekend of Septemb

request to upload update-inetd 4.38+nmu1+squeeze1

2011-09-11 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Dear members of the stable release team, I'd like to upload update-inetd 4.38+nmu1+squeeze1 to fix #638180 (that's severity: important). update-inetd parses successfully the /proc/pid/stat file of inetd only when the latter comes from the default "Provides: inet-superserver" package (ie. openbsd-

[SRM] proposed stable update red5

2011-09-11 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi release team, It's a long overdue update, but completly forgot this particular issue :/. So I think it's time to fix my issue... Changelog follows, debdiff is attached. The patch is just as dependency change (corner case in some environnement where glassfish-j2ee is not installed previously

Processed: Re: Bug#641031: pu: package sbcl/1:1.0.40.0-3

2011-09-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 641031 + squeeze confirmed Bug #641031 [release.debian.org] pu: package sbcl/1:1.0.40.0-3 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641031: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Bug#641031: pu: package sbcl/1:1.0.40.0-3

2011-09-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 641031 + squeeze confirmed thanks On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 17:47 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > I'd like to update sbcl in squeeze to fix #640951 (one of the > modules was referencing the old name of a function). The proposed fix > has been commited upstream last summer as [1] and been in unst

Processed: Re: Bug#641062: pu: package quassel/0.6.3-2

2011-09-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 641062 + squeeze confirmed Bug #641062 [release.debian.org] pu: package quassel/0.6.3-2 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Bug#641062: pu: package quassel/0.6.3-2

2011-09-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 641062 + squeeze confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 00:54 +0200, Thomas Mueller wrote: > A security issue within quassel was reported: > http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/TEMP-0640960-84D05E This is now CVE-2011-3354. > The quassel chat server can crash in case of some requests:

Re: Bug#637384: pu: package lintian/2.4.3+squeeze1

2011-09-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 15:00 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Sorry for the delay. I have attached the complete debdiff from 2.4.3 to > now including the "extra issue" and the debian/source/options magic to > make dpkg-source keep those files (mentioned above). > I have also added "incremental patch

Bug#640884: pu: package system-tools-backends/2.10.1-2

2011-09-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 15:41 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:51:40AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Joss already suggested this a while ago, although didn't file a bug > > for it. Please see my response at > > http://lists.debian.org/1314644249.20904.9.ca...@hathi.jungl

Bug#640884: pu: package system-tools-backends/2.10.1-2

2011-09-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 15:41:14 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > In that email, you were writing: > > > Unless we can guarantee that squeeze's dpkg is available (i.e. at > > least unpacked) before the proposed new preinst for s-t-b runs, the > > dpkg-maintscript-helper call at the end needs guardin

Re: [SRM] proposed stable update deja-dup

2011-09-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 13:54 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > > I see a package has now landed in p-u-NEW. In case it wasn't clear > > from the above, "the issue needs fixing in unstable before we look at > > stable" did *not* mean "please upload to stable without any further > > discussion as soon as

Re: Stable update for system-tools-backends

2011-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 19:57 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Thanks for this. There appears to be a potential issue with applying > the patch "as is" to stable. > > A user may have performed a partial lenny to squeeze upgrade, pulling in > the new system-tools-backends, but not explicitly ha

Bug#641155: pu: package mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1+squeeze1

2011-09-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Michael Tokarev [2011.09.11.0846 +0200]: > So I have to upload this "squeeze1" version to unstable, No, we prepare 3.2.2-1 for unstable, which contains all the fixes we propose for squeeze1. Once 3.2.2-1 moves to testing, we cherry-pick the fixes into a new squeeze1 package. -- .''