On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 15:41 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:51:40AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Joss already suggested this a while ago, although didn't file a bug
> > for it.  Please see my response at 
> > http://lists.debian.org/1314644249.20904.9.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
> 
> In that email, you were writing:
> 
> > Unless we can guarantee that squeeze's dpkg is available (i.e. at
> > least unpacked) before the proposed new preinst for s-t-b runs, the
> > dpkg-maintscript-helper call at the end needs guarding or will fail;
> > see the integration note at the end of dpkg-maintscript-helper(1).
> 
> Would you consider an upload with an added Pre-Depends on
> `dpkg (>= 1.15.7.2)` acceptable?

In the meantime Joss has uploaded a package which takes the alternative
approach and guards the calls.  This does have the disadvantage of
generating an error message on the -maintscript-helper calls if dpkg
hasn't been upgraded and potentially leaving the user with a conffile
prompt for a change they didn't make (due to the "mv" having been
executed, but not -ms-h not having updated the conffiles list), but does
mean the upgrade will successfully result in only the new conffile being
present.

Regards,

Adam




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1315765875.3482.14.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to