Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1

2011-07-12 Thread Robert Millan
Version: 8.2+ds1-1 2011/7/13 Adam D. Barratt : > Apologies if I'm missing something, but in that case why is #601803 > still open?  There seemed to be a little confusion at the end of the > report as to whether it was fixed or not. TBH, I don't really know. It was marked as fixed and later unmar

Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1

2011-07-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 09:05 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt : > > Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed > > changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be > > complete and functional in unstable - is that correct? [

Re: asterisk fixing CVE-2011-2536 for testing

2011-07-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 16:37 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote: > in order to allow asterisk to fix AST-2011-011 (CVE-2011-2536 - "Don't > leak SIP username information", #632029) also in testing we are now > still at 10 days due to the dependency on spandsp. > > This bug was fixed in unstable, stabl

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-07-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: arcboot_0.3.14+squeeze0_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qgxoa-0007dh...@franck.debian.org

Bug#633460: pu: package freebsd-utils/8.1-4+squeeze1

2011-07-12 Thread Robert Millan
2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt : > Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed > changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be > complete and functional in unstable - is that correct? No, it has been proven to be functional both in unstable and in

Re: Analysis of the gnome3 transitions

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 12.07.2011 09:01, schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 13.04.2011 15:03, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: >>> 3. devhelp >>> It is almost a self-contained transition (devhelp + anjuta). >>> AFAICT it can be done at any time. >>> >> >> and, anjuta-extras I guess. If everything needed is already read

Re: Analysis of the gnome3 transitions

2011-07-12 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 13.04.2011 15:03, schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: > Sorry for the late reply, and thanks for this detailed analysis. It's very > helpful! > > On 0, Josselin Mouette wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> not all modules are ready, but I’ve had a closer look at what the GNOME >> 3 library transitions imply and how w