2011/7/11 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: > Looking at the BTS, it appears from the log of #601803 that the proposed > changes to ifconfig for wireless support have not yet been proved to be > complete and functional in unstable - is that correct?
No, it has been proven to be functional both in unstable and in stable. Here's a report for unstable (which wasn't CCed to the BTS): http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/07/msg00094.html My local tests are succesful both in stable and unstable too, although I can't test it completely on my own because there are no visible APs. However the problem at hand (SIOCIFCREATE2: Bad address) has definitely disappeared. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxofyt0zwztpqj_vqvterufc4yzqbwgxp7u4bjnha4n...@mail.gmail.com
