grub2 update to squeeze?

2011-06-11 Thread Colin Watson
I'm considering a grub2 update to squeeze to fix a handful of important bugs. I'll try to secure as much testing as I reasonably can before upload, but before I start that work I'd like to know whether the SRMs feel that this set of changes is in general terms likely to be accepted. The Xen fix i

Please unblock bogl

2011-06-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thanks, Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110611195933.gx22...@const.famille.thibault.fr

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-06-11 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: samba_3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze4_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qvugh-tq...@franck.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#629190: pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze4

2011-06-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 629190 + pending Bug #629190 [release.debian.org] pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze4 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 629190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Bug#629190: pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze4

2011-06-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 629190 + pending thanks On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 21:23 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): > > Please go ahead, although without the changelog being UNRELEASED. :-) > > > samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze4 just got uploaded to s-p-u today... ...and

Re: please unblock udev

2011-06-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 04:37 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: Unblocked. For the record, Otavio acked the unblock, but only on IRC... Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archi

Bug#629190: pu: package samba/2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze4

2011-06-11 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): > tag 629190 + squeeze confirmed > thanks > > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 13:47 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > The attached two patches, proposed for s-p-u help fixing two bugs > > which I consider worth for stable: > > > > * Document the newly

Re: (PRSC) dokuwiki update for stable and oldstable

2011-06-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 21:23 +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: > I have an update for the package dokuwiki in stable and oldstable, to > apply an upstream security fix for an ACL bypass. Apologies for managing to miss this when you originally posted it. fwiw, that's generally less likely to happen if the

Re: Trinity

2011-06-11 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:25:30 +0200 rhism...@vodamail.co.za wrote: > Hello, I have been a Debian user since 5.0.3. This query is best directed at the debian-user mailing list. http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ > I recently got 6.0.1a and was perplexed to find out that kde3 was removed. Nobo

Trinity

2011-06-11 Thread rhismail
Hello, I have been a Debian user since 5.0.3. I recently got 6.0.1a and was perplexed to find out that kde3 was removed. I don't like kde4 or any of the other desktop environments. I found out that Timothy Pearson is continuing development of kde3, called Trinity. I would really appreciate it i

Processed: Re: Bug#630143: pu: package xserver-xorg-video-tseng/1:1.2.3-2+squeeze1

2011-06-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 630143 + squeeze confirmed Bug #630143 [release.debian.org] pu: package xserver-xorg-video-tseng/1:1.2.3-2+squeeze1 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 630143:

Bug#630143: pu: package xserver-xorg-video-tseng/1:1.2.3-2+squeeze1

2011-06-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 630143 + squeeze confirmed thanks On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 14:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > The tseng X driver appears to be entirely broken in squeeze. See > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32682 for the details, and > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-tseng/co

Re: Bug#629670: libpar-packer-perl: FTBFS: main.c:79: undefined reference to `pthread_atfork'

2011-06-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 18:07 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > A binNMU should be sufficient to get the multiarch directories into the > perl search path (perl -V:libpth), it's just been dropping the directories > until now because they didn't exist at build time. > > Release team: could you please schedul

Re: Bug#629670: libpar-packer-perl: FTBFS: main.c:79: undefined reference to `pthread_atfork'

2011-06-11 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 03:42:18PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:13:30 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: > > > Relevant part: > > > cc main.o my_par_pl.o -s -Wl,-E -fstack-protector -L/usr/local/lib > > > -L/usr/lib/perl/5.12/CORE -lperl -o ./par > > > main.o: In function `m

Bug#547393: libjpeg8 transition.

2011-06-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 22:27:59 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Either way we should probably get this started at this point, so please > > feel free to upload at your convenience. > > Fine. How should I proceed ? Should I upload

Bug#630143: pu: package xserver-xorg-video-tseng/1:1.2.3-2+squeeze1

2011-06-11 Thread Julien Cristau
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu The tseng X driver appears to be entirely broken in squeeze. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32682 for the details, and http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-tseng/

Bug#625544: Imagemagick transition: closer ?

2011-06-11 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 06/11/2011 12:01 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > It seems to me that the Imagemagick transition is well under way > now. There are only a few problems remaining, as far as I can tell: > > * we have a (rather stupid ;-)...) RC bug against imagemagick > itself, which should be fixed quite so