Bug#620975: marked as done (transition: python-apt)

2011-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:30:25 +0200 with message-id <4dedc581.6060...@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#620975: transition: python-apt has caused the Debian Bug report #620975, regarding transition: python-apt to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Banner Junho de 2011 REFRIMUR

2011-06-06 Thread Refrimur
  Problemas para visualizar a mensagem? Acesse aqui   Clique para não receber nossos emails    

Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc

2011-06-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
Matthias Klose wrote: > On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition > > (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and* > > libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to > > testing (or even better, before that

Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc

2011-06-06 Thread Matthias Klose
On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and* libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding

Bug#629477: transition: gnustep-base, gnustep-gui, libobjc

2011-06-06 Thread Yavor Doganov
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and* libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to testing (

Re: ghc now almost ready for migration

2011-06-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Mehdi, thanks for the investigations. Am Montag, den 06.06.2011, 18:16 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy: > On 04/06/2011 13:26, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > > with the upload of haskell-debian we have finally migrated (or removed) > > all packages to ghc instead of ghc6. Once -debian has waited fo

haskell-haddock on mips

2011-06-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, haskell-haddock failed with a strange error: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-haddock&arch=mips&ver=2.9.2-1&stamp=1307371902 Is there a build-time timeout in place? Or something similar? Maybe you can give back the package and check if it is reproducible? Thanks, Joachi

Re: ghc now almost ready for migration

2011-06-06 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 06/06/2011 18:16, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > endloop: 87+0: i-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:k-43:k-43:m-0:m-0:p-0:s-0:s-0 > now: 134+0: i-33:a-3:a-1:i-0:k-46:k-46:m-1:m-1:p-1:s-1:s-1 > * i386: configfile-doc, ftphs-doc, gitit, haskell-agda-doc, > haskell-convertible-doc, haskell-cpphs-doc, haskell-edison-api

Re: ghc now almost ready for migration

2011-06-06 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 04/06/2011 13:26, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > with the upload of haskell-debian we have finally migrated (or removed) > all packages to ghc instead of ghc6. Once -debian has waited for its 10 > days, I expect that the migration is possible, but of course there could > be unforseen difficulties,

Re: Analysis of the gnome3 transitions

2011-06-06 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 07.04.2011 00:50, schrieb Josselin Mouette: > If you know of other libraries that will be involved, please speak up > now. If you have read the whole mail, congratulations. * network-manager 0.9 network-manager 0.8.4 is currently in unstable, 0.9 rcS in experimental. GNOME 3 requires NM 0.9

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 03/05/2011 08:52, Thomas Goirand a écrit : -echo "$PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array." >&2 +[ "$quiet" -lt 1 ] && echo "$PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array." >&2 Out of context, I would prefer something like: if

Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:36:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > - Original message - > > also sprach Julien Cristau [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: > > > I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. > > > > It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with > > a triv

Re: What should we do with iceweasel/xulrunner/libmozjs?

2011-06-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:55:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:51:58PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:44:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:00:13 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > > > Any insight from the releas