On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:36:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > ----- Original message ----- > > also sprach Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: > > > I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. > > > > It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with > > a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next > > r-release? > > Let's say you have 500 servers, then you get 500 > useless warning emails for no valid reasons. Yes, > that's quite annoying, and I do believe worth an > update for large installations. Patching by had is > even more a > > What's your argument against the update if not > Julien the worthyness, which I believe is a mater > of opinion depending on the number of server one > has to do admin on?
+1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month, sending people an email about a normal situation is likely to mean that people miss the occasion when something isn't normal. Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110606115909.gr29...@urchin.earth.li
