Team,
Please allow libaddressable-ruby[1] to get into squeeze , its one of the
dependency for libdataobjects-ruby[2] , once libaddressable-ruby will get in
i can upload libdataobjects-ruby asap. It will close RC #593085 [3].
[1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/libaddressable-ruby_2.2.0-1.html
[2
Hi again!
A couple of weeks ago, I requested an unblock for pyxplot and (quite sensibly)
it was suggested that a little more time in sid would be appropriate first.
On Saturday 14 August 2010 06:39:28 Julien Cristau wrote:
> Please get back to us in a couple of weeks if no issues have popped up
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 06:10:27AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:07 -0300, Damián Viano wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:38:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Thanks. The diff looks ok, although the re-autotooling with an older
> > > version of auto* makes it
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Otavio Salvador
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:51:39 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> Please unblock it since it fixes many critical issues for users.
>>>
>> -Provides: ${xviddriver:Provides}, xserver
Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:32:27 +0200
with message-id <20100830213226.gg3...@ftbfs.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#594936: unblock: qemu/0.12.5+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594936,
regarding unblock: qemu/0.12.5+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package ltspfs
i uploaded a new upstream version to ltspfs (0.7-1) to experimental in order to
test it.
after some testing, i think it would be good to get these ch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package qemu version 0.12.5+dfsg-2. This version
basically contains two changes:
qemu (0.12.5+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* mips/mipsel binfmt registration: also ma
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:37:03 +0200
Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hi Alessio,
>
> On 08/08/2010 11:23 AM, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > Hello Peter,
> >
> > I intended to have mozplugger 1.14.1 in Debian squeeze so I asked for
> > the permission to upload it (squeeze is frozen now).
> > Adam Barratt, a rele
Processing changes file: libwww-perl_5.813-1+lenny2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oqb0t-000570...@franck.debian.org
Hi all,
I have made some progress on this bug, though it has not progress in the
expected direction. In other words I got some surprises.
First of all it the bug has been introduced in binutils when introducing
the MIPS PLT support [1] (commits around 2008-08-08). I am still
convinced it is actua
Am 18.08.2010 21:50, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:21 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 17.08.2010 00:17, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sat, 2010-08-14 at 13:46 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
mlt:
$ diff -Naur mlt-0.5.6/ /home/me/Coding/mlt/ --exclude=.git|diffstat
[...]
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 15:39:15 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After a round of RC bugs filing by various people, usb-modeswitch
>> upstream just released a new version correcting all the actually open
>> bugs against usb-modeswitch (and its little son
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 08/15/2010 09:48 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >unblock dpkg/1.15.8.4
> >
> >You can check the changes between both versions here:
> >http://git.debian.org/?p=dpkg/dpkg.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/sid
>
> We are cautious on letting a release that a
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> Would you mind having us upload 3.5.4 packages in unstable, eventually
> blocking it artificially for more than 10 days so that it is tested
> enough by unstable users?
I certainly understand that an answer can't come immediately. However,
would
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ltsp.
it fixes an important bug (#593770) which causes ltsp thin clients to ignore
DHCP supplied nameservers. the patch is taken from upstream, and is reasonably
well
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:34 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > I have to admit I'm not hugely happy with the "CSD trojan" messages but,
> > at least in terms of the configuration file setup, I'm not sure it's worth
> > divergin
Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:36:08 +0100
with message-id
<1283193368.28333.1657.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#594896: unblock: sphinx/0.6.6-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #594896,
regarding unblock: sphinx/0.6.6-3
to be marked as done.
This me
* Adam D. Barratt , 2010-08-30, 16:06:
Please unblock package sphinx. The new version improves documentation
(bug #593623).
A couple of quick comments:
+\fIfilename\fR
+Force to generate documentation for the file.
"Force to" doesn't sound right - "Force generation of documentation for
\fIfil
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> That are not your "changes".
I thought Mehdi wanted the contents.
> If you want, that your new build gets uploaded to Debian by a sponsor, you
> have to build and check your package+changes+diff and after that upload the
> whole to any sp
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 05:15:22PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:56:20PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:52:52PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > > In fact, the related bug #464084 reports a situation where the callouts
> > >
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:42:28AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I have to admit I'm not hugely happy with the "CSD trojan" messages but,
> at least in terms of the configuration file setup, I'm not sure it's worth
> diverging from upstream on.
>
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded, please unblock ope
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 13:44:05 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:45:15AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > virtualbox-ose
> > 153 files changed, 16879 insertions(+), 2125 deletions(-)
> > virtualbox-guest-additions is unreviewable since it's an iso (wtf?).
> >
> > Is the
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 19:57 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 11:36 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Hi Adam, thanks very much for taking a look!
> >
> > On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > [ -f python/libgearman.c.orig ] || [ -f python/libgearman.c ] && mv
Hi Julien,
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 00:21:14 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > Please note that upstream recently fixed a segfault bug[2] and when the
> > former bug[1] will be fixed, I'll ask for its freeze exception as well.
> >
> Is
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
> > please indicate as such; otherwise I think it's reasonable for the
> > maintainer to downgrade t
Luk Claes wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> The xz-utils package has reached its 10 days.
>
> unblocked, not closing bug as you still seem to speak about other changes?
Yep. Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
Luk Claes wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> The xz-utils package has reached its 10 days.
>
> unblocked, not closing bug as you still seem to speak about other changes?
Yep. Thank you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:13 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Please unblock package sphinx. The new version improves documentation
> (bug #593623).
A couple of quick comments:
+\fIfilename\fR
+Force to generate documentation for the file.
"Force to" doesn't sound right - "Force generation of document
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> In any case, please get back to us once the package has reached its
10 days.
>
> The xz-utils package has reached its 10 days.
unblocked, not closing bug as you still seem to speak about other changes?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-08-2010 10:50, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> I uploaded these packages yesterday, because they had pending l10n
>> fixes. Should I ask for unblocks on -release?
>
> They all can be unblock
On Sat, 2010-08-28 at 09:22 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Please could you unblock gutenprint 5.2.6-1?
>
> This is a new upstream point release which adds support for
> many new printers, fixes support for some existing printers
> and adds a new translation. There's also some trivial
> cleanup of t
Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:28:54 +0200
with message-id <4c7bc026.9050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: release.debian.org: unblock: xen-tools/4.2~rc1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #594193,
regarding release.debian.org: unblock: xen-tools/4.2~rc1-1
to be marked as done.
This mea
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 23:50 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:44 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote:
> >> I would like to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0 because there are a lot of
> >> fixes since 0.1.0~rc2. There is
* Michael Prokop wrote:
> Ok, 3.4.0 went through NEW (thanks) and I just uploaded 3.4.1 with
> the mentioned bugfix to unstable.
>
> Please approve fai 3.4.1 for squeeze.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Processing changes file: slim_1.3.0-1+lenny3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny8_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny8_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openoffice.org_2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny8_i386.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package sphinx. The new version improves documentation
(bug #593623).
unblock sphinx/0.6.6-3
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:59 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> I would like to request a freeze exception for paraview 3.8.1-1.
> 3.8.0-1 (testing) contains invalid configuration fails which made
> vtkedge FTBFS (#590843).
207 files changed, 10838 insertions(+), 3530 deletions(-)
That seems like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30-08-2010 02:54, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your comment! I was not aware of that rule myself.
> I have now changed both Required-Start and Required-Stop to a more
> suiteable value. That is depend on $local_fs, $time, $syslog for star
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
> [Petter Reinholdtsen]
>> These are the changelog entries since the version currently in
>> testing:
>
> Since my first request for a freeze exception, a serious security
> issue was discovered and fixed. I just uploaded the fix. This is the
> changelog:
>
> sssd (1.2.1-4)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package libvigraimpex. In the new version:
- The default compiler is used on all architectures (bug #588168).
- Documentation was improved (bugs #590069, #590068).
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 594457 with 594484
Bug #594457 [libconfig-inetd-perl] libconfig-inetd-perl: Package is empty
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 594457: 594484
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
Please unblock sisu-markup-samples 2.0.6-1, (a documentation package for sisu)
numerous documentation related corrections (and an additional markup sample
provided) made specifically for squeeze.
No package depends on sisu-markpup-samples and the changes which
prepare the package for the release a
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:59 +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote:
> Please allow libramaze-ruby[0] to get into squeeze. It has RC
> fixed[1].
It was already unblocked a few days ago.
$ grep-excuses libramaze-ruby
libramaze-ruby (2010.06.18-1 to 2010.06.18-2)
Maintainer: Deepak Tripathi
Too young
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 12:45:15AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> virtualbox-ose
> 153 files changed, 16879 insertions(+), 2125 deletions(-)
> virtualbox-guest-additions is unreviewable since it's an iso (wtf?).
>
> Is there a particular reason to want this in? If yes, can you help
> make the re
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove usbview from tpu, it's binaries are deemed unusable by the
porter/buildd admin.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove tijmp from tpu its binaries are deemed unusable by the
porter/buildd admin.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi
Please remove picprog from testing-proposed-updates, it's up-to-date in testing
apart from the binary on s390 which the porter/buildd admin marked as
Not-For-Us.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Release Team,
Thanks for all your good work.
Please allow libramaze-ruby[0] to get into squeeze. It has RC fixed[1].
[0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/libramaze-ruby.html
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593081
--
Deepak Tripathi
E3 71V3 8Y C063 (We Live By Code)
http
Clint Byrum was heard to say:
On Aug 28, 2010, at 1:49 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Markus, it would be great if an 0.8.4 or 0.8.3.1 release arrived with
soname bumped. We could just rebuild all of our rdepends, but then anybody
who has depended on libdbi0 will break when the new version arrives
Hi Laszlo,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 00:21:14 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Please note that upstream recently fixed a segfault bug[2] and when the
> former bug[1] will be fixed, I'll ask for its freeze exception as well.
>
Is there any chance of that happening this week? We're getting packa
50 matches
Mail list logo
