Bug#570462: nmu: second round for the php5 transition

2010-02-19 Thread Raphael Geissert
On Friday 19 February 2010 13:17:09 Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Raphael Geissert writes: > > The php-ps binNMU FTBFS on powerpc due to a libtiff.a error. > > Please give it back if it has been fixed already. > > Already done. Looks like it failed again. > > There are still some packages tha

Bug#570594: Haskell binNMUs

2010-02-19 Thread Joachim Breitner
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Release Team, for Haskell libraries we now have a system of provides and depends in place that guarantees that an ABI change in one of the packages makes broken reverse dependencies uninstallable, simil

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2010-02-19 Thread Archive Administrator
Processing changes file: polipo_1.0.4-1+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polipo_1.0.4-1+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polipo_1.0.4-1+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: polipo_1.0.4-1+lenny1_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes fil

Re: ghc6 still fails to build on ia64; what to do?

2010-02-19 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Joachim Breitner writes: > Am Sonntag, den 14.02.2010, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: >> Well, building of -9 failed again, so I guess the bootstrapping is not >> the only problem. Note that merulo is slightly newer than caballero >> (Madison core vs. the older McKinley core), so the

Bug#570462: marked as done (nmu: second round for the php5 transition)

2010-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:17:09 +0100 with message-id <87aav5doi2@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de> and subject line Re: Bug#570462: nmu: second round for the php5 transition has caused the Debian Bug report #570462, regarding nmu: second round for the php5 transition to be marked as done

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[This was answered on IRC, but for completeness...] On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 13:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 11:42 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > > ok, then maybe something is broken with > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash > > > because

Bug#570512: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ not updated

2010-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
reassign 570512 buildd.debian.org thanks Hi, On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 14:35 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > it seems that https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ is not updated any more > since about January. It would be nice to get those dumps working again. The stats are handled by the buildd team; rea

Processed: Re: Bug#570512: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ not updated

2010-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 570512 buildd.debian.org Bug #570512 [release.debian.org] https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ not updated Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'buildd.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you n

Bug#570512: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ not updated

2010-02-19 Thread Joachim Breitner
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, it seems that https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ is not updated any more since about January. It would be nice to get those dumps working again. Thanks, Joachim - -- System Information: Debian Release:

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 11:42 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > ok, then maybe something is broken with > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash > > because only 2.2.9-4 is listed for amd64? > > It's a feature. > > Both /status/package.php and /pkg.cgi only display bin

HPPA and Erlang packages

2010-02-19 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi release managers! I'd like to ask you about what to do with Erlang and its reverse dependencies on hppa architecture. The problem is that there's a bug with fork()+exec() which makes erlang FTBFS (and the currently built packages are broken as well) on hppa (see [1], [2]). It seems to be very c

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:25 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 23:22 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > maybe you did not fetch all, the amd64 package of gnucash, version > > > 2.2.9-4, is also broken

Bug#570488: marked as done (RM: ocaml-batteries/0.20090405+beta1-5)

2010-02-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:29:03 + with message-id <1266578943.5435.5139.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> and subject line Re: Bug#570488: RM: ocaml-batteries/0.20090405+beta1-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #570488, regarding RM: ocaml-batteries/0.20090405+beta1-5 t

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 23:22 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > > > Micha Lenk writes: > > > > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libg

Bug#570488: RM: ocaml-batteries/0.20090405+beta1-5

2010-02-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hello, Please remove ocaml-batteries from testing. It currently fails to build from source (#569455). Although this is easily fixed, upstream project leader has changed, and so did other aspects