spu for vpb-driver 4.2.38-1?

2009-12-18 Thread Ron
Hi, There's a bug in libvpb0 that can cause asterisk to crash when no config file is present and no cards are detected. In that case the card count is uninitialised, and random hilarity may ensue. It's been suggested that this warrants an upload to spu to fix, and I'm inclined to agree. A fix

Processed: emacs21 still not removed

2009-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 559753 Bug #559753 {Done: Luk Claes } [release.debian.org] RM: emacs21/21.4a+1-5.7 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database

Bug#559753: emacs21 still not removed

2009-12-18 Thread Sven Joachim
reopen 559753 thanks Unfortunately, emacs21 still has not been removed from testing. It seems that another removal hint is needed for prime (reverse dependency of libsuikyo-ruby1.8) to get rid of suikyo and thus emacs21. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.o

[SRM] debmirror: update because of change in main Debian archive

2009-12-18 Thread Frans Pop
The main Debian archive now has rsyncable gzipped meta files. This has caused debmirror to unnecessarily download the gzipped file after first applying pdiffs, because the md5sum of the gzipped file created by debmirror no longer matches the one in the Release file. Please accept debmirror (200

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

2009-12-18 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 18 December 2009, Philipp Kern wrote: >> While I did not take care about the fallout due to time constraints on >> my side, I did take a look at the meta-gnome2 migration back then. We >> did not place any approval hint but it seems that the multiple arch:all >> confus

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

2009-12-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 18 December 2009, Philipp Kern wrote: > While I did not take care about the fallout due to time constraints on > my side, I did take a look at the meta-gnome2 migration back then. We > did not place any approval hint but it seems that the multiple arch:all > confused britney sufficiently

SRM update request: gnash (Re: Any hope of an gnash update in Lenny?)

2009-12-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi stable release managers, would you accept a update of gnash via s-p-u with the attached patch for 497633, severity important, causing ~/.Xsession of a user under certain frequent circumstances to grow several hundred megabytes in a few days as one can be read in the bug. (This has also cause

Bug#561341: marked as done (RM: Please remove debian-edu-config_1.430~svn60149 from P-U-NEW)

2009-12-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:00:00 +0100 with message-id <200912181100.06570.hol...@layer-acht.org> and subject line done has caused the Debian Bug report #561341, regarding RM: Please remove debian-edu-config_1.430~svn60149 from P-U-NEW to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Re: Problems with Debian PowerPC

2009-12-18 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:49:47PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > It's almost certain that both the relevant package maintainer and the > > release team are already aware of this and that it has been a conscious > > choice to accept the breakage. > Given that the package version clearly indicat