[re-sending with corrected recipient list having realised that #555231
isn't a release.d.o bug]
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 14:35 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:02:23 +0100 Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > How big is the diff from prototyp
Hi
During 6 days already, there is nothing built on hppa. This is obviously
blocking a lot of packages to migrate to testing and can not continue
much longer.
What's the status of fixing the issues that caused this and how long do
you think this will continue?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:02:23 +0100 Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > How big is the diff from prototype 1.4.0 (as used in the current
> > package) to 1.6.1? The bug report mentions that patches fixing the two
>
> Don't know, I haven't even looked. There were other is
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:20:18PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> wow, it didn't even make it into the bug tracker. Please, pretty please,
> get that issue fixed in stable and oldstable. The argument in Wil's mail
> seems convincing.
I take that as a GO permission to upload, yes?
--
Chuan-kai Li
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:49:01AM -0800, Chuan-kai Lin wrote:
> I propose updating the fam packages in stable (lenny) and oldstable
> (etch) to fix the long-standing bug of occasional 100% CPU usage.
>
> The fix is very simple: linking famd with librt and libpthread. I am
> not familiar with the
"Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
Hi,
> How big is the diff from prototype 1.4.0 (as used in the current
> package) to 1.6.1? The bug report mentions that patches fixing the two
Don't know, I haven't even looked. There were other issues before those
two I believe, and they never got fixed. I know that
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 10:59 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I've prepared an update of mt-daapd for oldstable, addressing #555231
> (two CVEs in prototype.js). Changelog:
>
> mt-daapd (0.2.4+r1376-1.1+etch3) oldstable; urgency=low
> .
>* debian/rules, debian/prototype-1.6.1.js:
> + S
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu, opu
I propose updating the fam packages in stable (lenny) and oldstable
(etch) to fix the long-standing bug of occasional 100% CPU usage.
The fix is very simple: linking famd with librt and lib
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Luk Claes [2009.11.11.1859 +0100]:
>> As far as I have seen it was not the message, but the title that was wrong.
>>
>>> There are still media expecting us to freeze in December.
>> We did send another announcement [1] to rectify that.
>>
>>> The media seem to
also sprach Luk Claes [2009.11.11.1859 +0100]:
> As far as I have seen it was not the message, but the title that was wrong.
>
> > There are still media expecting us to freeze in December.
>
> We did send another announcement [1] to rectify that.
>
> > The media seem to think that what happened
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Luk Claes [2009.11.11.1828 +0100]:
>>> Any reaction to this?
>> This seems like an invitation to get whatever statement to attack.
>
> No, I wasn't going to attack anything. Sorry, I should have made
> that clear maybe. I just want a baseline on which to formu
also sprach Luk Claes [2009.11.11.1828 +0100]:
> > Any reaction to this?
>
> This seems like an invitation to get whatever statement to attack.
No, I wasn't going to attack anything. Sorry, I should have made
that clear maybe. I just want a baseline on which to formulate a new
press statement.
Johann Felix Soden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The packages libitext-java and pdftk block each other from migration to
> testing. Could you add a hint, please?
easy hint added.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach martin f krafft [2009.10.26.1054 +0100]:
>> As far as I can tell, the press release during DebConf9[0] is still
>> taken to be the official position of the Debian project, at least if
>> I scan the pertinent media sources.
>>
>> Luk's e-mail updates have not ov
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 02.11.2009, 20:10 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
>>> @debian-release, please adjust these DepWaits:
>>>
>>> gb . haskell-zip-archive . alpha amd64 hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64
>>> kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc . -o
>>> dw . haskell-zip-a
Hi,
I've prepared an update of mt-daapd for oldstable, addressing #555231
(two CVEs in prototype.js). Changelog:
mt-daapd (0.2.4+r1376-1.1+etch3) oldstable; urgency=low
.
* debian/rules, debian/prototype-1.6.1.js:
+ Ship an updated copy of the prototype library, fixing a number
o
16 matches
Mail list logo
