martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> [2009.11.11.1859 +0100]: >> As far as I have seen it was not the message, but the title that was wrong. >> >>> There are still media expecting us to freeze in December. >> We did send another announcement [1] to rectify that. >> >>> The media seem to think that what happened in July was officially >>> sanctioned (due to it being an official press announcement). Ever >>> since, a lot of discussion, the decision was reverted, and >>> a tentative freeze date announced. No announcement about any of this >>> was made, so you cannot really blame the media for assuming that the >>> goals of July are still current. >> There was another announcement [1]. >> >>> Does this make sense and explain my motivation now? >> Not really. There was another press announcement [1] and as far as >> I've seen the media used indeed sometimes wrong titles, but the >> focus if not all of their message was around time based freezes >> and not so much about any particular date. > > Hm, strange. I cannot recall the article(s) that made me write my > initial message. It definitely seemed like this announcement was > never seen or absorbed by anyone. Maybe the two were too close to > each other. > > So http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00010.html > together with the announcement about a tentative goal March is still > current?
Yes. March is not set in stone, though unless there are major reasons (like a way too high RC bug count) not to, it will be the time we freeze. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
