Re: BinNMUs for libogg.la removal

2009-08-23 Thread Luk Claes
Christophe Mutricy wrote: > Hello, > > Le Thu 06 Aug 09 à 17:14 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : >>> Libogg-dev 1.1.4~dfsg-1 recent upload has removed /usr/lib/libogg.la. >>> >>> It breaks the .la which reference libogg.la. That concerns at least >>> libshout, libflac, libvorbis and libtheora: >>> >>> s

Re: binNMUs due to haskell library uploads

2009-08-23 Thread Luk Claes
Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded haskell-network and haskell-parallel, and there are binNMUs > due. Note that the script also cought some packages on ia64 that were > built against the old ghc6 before: All scheduled. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@l

Re: libcdio transition

2009-08-23 Thread Luk Claes
Nicolas Boullis wrote: > Hi, > > The new libcdio in still waiting in unstable, after 32 days, although > all depending packages have been successfully rebuilt against it > (according to https://buildd.debian.org/transitions/summary.html). > As far as I understand it, this is because some maintai

Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-23 Thread Matthias Klose
On 23.08.2009 17:40, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]: How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier? I asked the Debian ARM list about the status and got the following responses. Co

remove kio-locate/0.4.5+ds-1

2009-08-23 Thread Raphael Geissert
Hi, Please remove kio-locate from testing, as it doesn't work with KDE4 in its current state. #540952 should be considered the removal reason and blocking bug (as I'll be fixing the other bugs in an upload soon). TIA. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.

Re: Bug#540317: libcompizconfig0: Uninstalable due to libprotobuf3 removal

2009-08-23 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 11:19:07PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 09:29:04AM +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > > libprotobuf3 has been removed. > > So libcompizconfig0 (and the whole compiz stack) is uninstalable. > > I've scheduled binNMUs for this package now. (Seems

Re: (e)glibc plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-23 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:36PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: > Heya, Hi, > As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing > Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December > 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes w

Re: arm port plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-23 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Marc Brockschmidt [2009-08-16 14:40]: > How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those > happen? Can we do something to make them easier? I asked the Debian ARM list about the status and got the following responses. Colin Tuckley mentioned "a few things which are

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-23 Thread David Nusinow
Julien Cristau wrote: [other xsf members, feel free to chime in if I'm forgetting something or saying something stupid :)] On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: * Which major upstream releases of X.org are expected in the next two years? Which of those are mate

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-23 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 13:23 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: > > > * Which major upstream releases of X.org are expected in the next two > > years? Which of those are material for Debian stable, which might be a bit > > flaky?

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-23 Thread Julien Cristau
[other xsf members, feel free to chime in if I'm forgetting something or saying something stupid :)] On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: > * Which major upstream releases of X.org are expected in the next two > years? Which of those are material for Debian stable,

Re: Security update for ‘burn’ package

2009-08-23 Thread Ben Finney
Stephen Gran writes: > What I think Ben means is that there is an issue with his package that > doesn't warrant a DSA, but that he would like to see fixed in stable. Or rather, that I've been told [0]: […] we encourage maintainers to fix such minor security issues through a point update

Re: Security update for ‘bur n’ package

2009-08-23 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Ben Finney said: > Philipp Kern writes: > > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 03:57:34PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > > The package ‘burn’ has a security bug open, assigned the alert > > > number TEMP-0542329 “burn: Insecure escaping of file names”. I have > > > been advised

Re: Security update for ‘burn’ package

2009-08-23 Thread Ben Finney
Philipp Kern writes: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 03:57:34PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > The package ‘burn’ has a security bug open, assigned the alert > > number TEMP-0542329 “burn: Insecure escaping of file names”. I have > > been advised to make a bug-fix release of this package for ‘stable’ > >

Re: Security update for ‘bur n’ package

2009-08-23 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 03:57:34PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > The package ‘burn’ has a security bug open, assigned the alert number > TEMP-0542329 “burn: Insecure escaping of file names”. I have been > advised to make a bug-fix release of this package for ‘stable’ and > send a ‘debdiff’ output to t

Re: Bug#443459: release-notes: With beginning of Lenny /etc/debian_version will be touched with every point release

2009-08-23 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Nicolas, go ahead. Looks good to me. On Sun Aug 23, 2009 at 00:01:55 +0200, Nicolas François wrote: > Hello Martin, > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 04:12:19PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > > With the release of Lenny /etc/debian_version will be touched with every > > point release, to r