Re: open issues with the hppa port

2009-08-21 Thread Frans Pop
Andreas Barth wrote: > * Carlos O'Donell (car...@systemhalted.org) [090821 16:49]: > >> xmms2 is the only package that doesn't build. >> >> Analysis of the xmms2 build shows that this is a python crash. >> Thankfully the python crash reproduces (in a different location each >> time). I'll look in

Re: Mozilla plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 03:39:55PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:21PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: > > Heya, > > > > As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing > > Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in Dece

Re: OpenOffice.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-21 Thread Armin Berres
On Thu, 20 Aug 09 19:26, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 16.08.2009 15:15, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >.0s should be avoided for Debian stable, the are almost always full of > >bad bugs/regressions, as we see e.g. in 3.1.0, too. > > So this would mean, that squeeze will release with 3.1.x (3.1.0 > release

Re: version screwup: any recourse besides epoch?

2009-08-21 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2009-08-21 Jay Berkenbilt wrote: >> Jay Berkenbilt wVrote: > >> > I screwed up and released tiff 3.9.0beta+deb1 to experimental earlier >> > this week instead of 3.9.0~beta+deb1. Now I'd like to upload 3.9.0 to > [...] >> I'll >> upload 4.0.0beta3 to experimental wh

Re: version screwup: any recourse besides epoch?

2009-08-21 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Jay Berkenbilt a écrit : > Please disregard. I figured it out. I'm going to upload 3.9.0 to > unstable, which will work fine because it's newer than 3.8.2. I'll > upload 4.0.0beta3 to experimental which will clear out 3.9.0beta+deb1. You can also just ask ftpmaster to remove (via a bugreport ag

Re: version screwup: any recourse besides epoch?

2009-08-21 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2009-08-21 Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Jay Berkenbilt wVrote: > > I screwed up and released tiff 3.9.0beta+deb1 to experimental earlier > > this week instead of 3.9.0~beta+deb1. Now I'd like to upload 3.9.0 to [...] > I'll > upload 4.0.0beta3 to experimental which will clear out 3.9.0beta+deb1.

Re: open issues with the hppa port

2009-08-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Carlos O'Donell (car...@systemhalted.org) [090821 16:49]: > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Andreas Barth wrote: > > As an current exmaple, take the libcdio-transition. This transition > > needs to have updated packages xmms2, xmp and vlc. However, the > > packages are out-of-date on hppa, and f

Re: version screwup: any recourse besides epoch?

2009-08-21 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > I screwed up and released tiff 3.9.0beta+deb1 to experimental earlier > this week instead of 3.9.0~beta+deb1. Now I'd like to upload 3.9.0 to > unstable. I really don't want to introduce an epoch. Is it possible to > make 3.9.0beta+deb1 just disappear? It's never been

version screwup: any recourse besides epoch?

2009-08-21 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
I screwed up and released tiff 3.9.0beta+deb1 to experimental earlier this week instead of 3.9.0~beta+deb1. Now I'd like to upload 3.9.0 to unstable. I really don't want to introduce an epoch. Is it possible to make 3.9.0beta+deb1 just disappear? It's never been anywhere but experimental, and

Re: open issues with the hppa port

2009-08-21 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Andreas Barth wrote: > As an current exmaple, take the libcdio-transition. This transition > needs to have updated packages xmms2, xmp and vlc. However, the > packages are out-of-date on hppa, and for this reason cannot enter > testing (and they depend on an old lib

Re: Mozilla plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-08-21 Thread Alexander Sack
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 02:41:21PM +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: > Heya, > > As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing > Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December > 2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes wou

Please binNMU geany-plugins against new geany (0.18)

2009-08-21 Thread Chow Loong Jin
Hello, There was recently a new release of Geany (>= 0.18) in which the plugin ABI was broken, hence requiring that all plugins be rebuilt in order to be loaded by Geany. nmu geany-plugins_0.17.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against new geany (Closes: #542716)' -- Kind regards, Chow Loong Jin sig